Pre-service English Teachers’ Use of Reinforcement Strategy in Microteaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1146Keywords:
reinforcement strategy, pre-service English teachers, micro teaching classAbstract
This article investigates the reinforcement strategies used by pre-service English teachers in a microteaching class. The researchers employed a case study. Twenty-two students participated in this research. Observation, interviews, and video recording were used to gather the data. The data were then organized, coded, interpreted. The findings revealed that four types of reinforcement were used by pre-service English teachers in microteaching, namely positive reinforcement (81.93%), negative reinforcement (17%), punishment (3.36%), and extinction (2.94%). Moreover, the pre-service English teachers delivered reinforcement strategy by using warmth and enthusiasm expressions of praise, avoiding the punishment, and using non-variety usage of positive reinforcement. In conclusion, pre-service English teachers mostly used positive reinforcements in their teaching practice. They delivered the reinforcement strategy by using warmth and enthusiasm expressions of praise, avoiding the punishment, and using non-variety usage of positive reinforcement.
References
Adamson, R. M., Kilpatrick, K., Smith, P., & DePaepe, P. (2015). Understanding positive reinforcement and replacement behaviors within the classroom. Overland Park: CLD.
Afirm, T. (2015). Reinforcement. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. Retrieved from https://afirm.fpg.unc.edu/reinforcement
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to researh in education (8 ed.). California: Wadsworth.
Asmin, A. I. (2019). Teachers' strategies in teaching English at vocational high cchool. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7(2), 261-265.
Bettencourt, E. M., Gillett, M. D., & Hull, R. E. (1983). Effects of teacher enthusiasm training on student on-task behavior and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 435-450.
Bodgan, R. C., & Biklen , S. K. (2003). Qualitative research of education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7 ed.). London: Routledge.
Cossairt, A., Hall, R. V., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). The effects of experimenter's instructions, feedback, and praise on teacher praise and student attending behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6(1), 89-100.
Dwoning, J. A., Moran, M. R., Myles, B. S., & Ormsbee , C. K. (1991). Using reinforcement in the classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 27(2), 85-90.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies.
Kirana, E. D. (2018). Applying positive reinforcement to increase students' motivation in learning English for grade VII in SMP Pangudi Luhur 1. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Larriba-Quest, K. (2017). Reinforcement in the classroom. The Reporter, 27(18), 12-13. Retrieved from https://www.iidc.indiana.edu/pages/reinforcement-in-the-classroom
Lipe, D., & Jung, S. M. (1971). Manipulating incentives to enhance school learning. Review of Educational Research, 41(4), 249-280.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370-396.
Masruddin, M., & Sander, A. (2019). The Efficacy of Pre Service English Teacher Training Camp towards Students Teaching Skills. The Asian EFL Journal. 21(2.3). 200-215
McDaniel, T. R. (1980). Exploring alternatives to punishment: The keys to effective discipline. Phi Delta Kappan, 61(7), 455-580.
Meacham, M. L., & Wiesen, A. E. (1969). Changing Classroom Behavior: A manual for precision. New York: Intext Educational Publishers.
Miltenberger, R. (2008). Behaviour modification. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Oktarine, W. (2012). A study of the effects of giving reinforcement on students' motivation in Structure IV classes of Sanata Dharma University. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Rosenshine, B. (1970). Enthusiastic teaching: A research review. The School Review, 78(4), 499-514.
Shanty, H. (2018). Teacher Strategies towards Students Disruptive Behavior in Learning English. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 3(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v3i1.142
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organism: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton Century.
Stasia, B. (2013). Microteaching students' perception on the use of reinforcement skill in microteaching class. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Sudirman, A. M. (2018). The application of politeness strategies among teacher and students in classroom interaction at SMA 1 Pamboang Majene. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 6(1), 30-37.
Sumantri, M., & Permana, J. (1999). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Proyek Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Dirjen Dikti, Depdikbud.
Turney, C., Cairns, L. G., Williams, G., Hatton, N., & Owens, L. C. (1973). Sidney Micro Skills handbook (Series I): Reinforcement, basic questioning, variability. Sidney: Sidney University Press.
Walker, J. E., Shea, T. M., & Bauer, A. M. (2007). Behaviour management. Upper Saddle RIver, NJ: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall.
Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Zebua, K. (2017). The use of verbal reinforcement to motivate 11th grade students of SMA Budya Wacana Yogyakarta to speak English. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma Unversity.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)