ANATOMY OF ORAL ACADEMIC PRESENTATION SKILLS: A COURSE DESIGN FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

Akbar Akbar

Abstract


The core concern of teaching in tertiary education is to enable college students to experience higher order of thinking in knowledge exploration that shape the students’ academic identity. The focus of language proficiency in this context is not for communicative use in general but more specific to academic purposes such as research dissemination. This article explores essential components of a course design of Academic presentation Skills to facilitate research based learning. This article first discusses the inclusion of research based learning and teaching framework into Oral Academic Presentation Skills (OAPS) course. Before it portrays the course design of Research Based-Academic Presentation Skills, this Article identifies the drawbacks and the benefits of the course design. Furthermore, essential components of the OAPS such as learning objectives and, technology and online materials are discussed in order to provide a clear portrait of OAPS. Implication and suggestions for future researchers and course designers are also discussed. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Butler, S. (1999). Catalyzing student autonomy through action research in a problem-centered learning environment. Research in Science Education, 29(1), 127–140.

Fazey, D., & Fazey, J. (2001). The potential for autonomy in learning: Perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students. Studies in Higher Education,26(3), 345–361.

Gao, Y., & Bartlett, B. (2014). Opportunities and Challenges for Negotiating Appropriate EAP Practices in China. In English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Asia (pp. 13-31). SensePublishers.

Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12.

John Willison & Kerry O’Regan (2007) Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers, Higher Education Research & Development, 26:4, 393-409, DOI: 10.1080/07294360701658609

Paton, M. (2011). Asian students, critical thinking and English as an academic lingua franca. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 32(1), 27-39.

The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook: New York. Retrieved September 29, 2005, from http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/

Thompson, C. (1999). Critical thinking: What is it and how do we teach it in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programs? Paper presented at the HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 12-15 July.

Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12..




Flag Counter