URGENSI PENJATUHAN PIDANA MATI TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DAN RELEVANSINYA DALAM PERSPEKTIF Hukum, HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN HUKUM ISLAM

Authors

  • Ilham Laman UIN Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
  • Agustan Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Sabaruddin Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Wawan Haryanto Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Amrullah Harun Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/maddika.v3i1.2713

Keywords:

Urgency, Narcotics, Qishash

Abstract

Indonesia as a country with the largest Muslim majority in the world, recognizes that the death penalty is appropriate and urgent in certain crimes or crimes that affect general problems, threaten human life and state problems. However, if based on the concept of capital punishment and narcotics crime, it can be concluded that it is necessary to study more than the urgency of imposing capital punishment on narcotics criminals. human beings to live and is contrary to the concept of the purpose of resocialization punishment so that the perpetrator can become a better person and can return to society. Through the problem the author then describes with a qualitative method, this method is a problem with social problems based on conditions of reality (real) and natural settings that complex and detailed, qualitatively trying to gain understanding, enlightenment on the phenomenon of research and exploitation in the same situation. because this crime causes passive victims, requires rehabilitation and law enforcement costs, destroys youth, and supports society and the state. In Islamic law, the term Qishash is known, which is an equal punishment for one person's actions against another person, in this case the death row inmates, where the main perpetrator has been executed by the death penalty for drug offenders, it is appropriate because they do damage to every aspect of life. nation and state.

References

Sumber Buku:

Abdi, Mualimin. “Hukuman Mati (Death Penalty) Terhadap Terpidana Narkotika Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Legislasi Indonesia†4 (2007).

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Dasar-Dasar Researt. Bandung, 1995.

Hariyono, Bambang. “Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkoba Di Indonesia.†Universitas Diponegoro, 2009.

Maryana.

Panggabean, SR. Sianturi dan Mompang. Hukum Penitensier Di Indonesia. Bandung, 1999.

“Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 2/PUU-V/2007 Dan Perkara Nomor 3/PUU-V/2007 Perihal Pengujian UU No.22 Tahun 1997 Tentang Narkotika Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945..

Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 2/PUU-V/2007 Dan Perkara Nomor 3/PUU-V/2007 Perihal Pengujian UU No.22 Tahun 1997 Tentang Narkotika Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.

Supramo, H. gatot. Hukum Narkoba Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2004.

Yosodiningrat, Henry. Dikutip Dari Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 2/PUU-V/2007 Dan Perkara Nomor 3/PUU- V/2007 Perihal Pengujian UU No.22 Tahun 1997 Tentang Narkotika Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945’.

Sumber Artikel Jurnal

Abdi, Mualimin. “Hukuman Mati (Death Penalty) Terhadap Terpidana Narkotika Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Legislasi Indonesia†4 (2007).

Khermarinah, Pandangan Hukum Islam Terhadap Hukuman Mati Bagi Terpidana Bali Nine Dalam Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris IAIN Bengkulu, Manhaj, Vol. 4 Nomor 1 Januari - April 2016.

Maryana, Dina. Analisis Kebijakan Pidana Mati Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia: Studi Kasus Pidana Mati Terhadap Pengedar Narkoba Di Indonesia’. Yogyakarta, 2017.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

Laman, I., Agustan, Sabaruddin, Haryanto, W., & Harun, A. (2022). URGENSI PENJATUHAN PIDANA MATI TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DAN RELEVANSINYA DALAM PERSPEKTIF Hukum, HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN HUKUM ISLAM. MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24256/maddika.v3i1.2713

Citation Check