DIVERSI DALAM TINJAUAN USUL FIQH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/maddika.v3i2.3312

Keywords:

Diversion, child crime, Principles of Islamic Jurisprudenc

Abstract

Diversion is meant to divert children’s criminal offenses out of the criminal justice system. Persuasive action or non-penal approach and give the children the opportunity to correct mistakes as the main principles. The study aims to find the conformity of a diversion with Islamic law through the principles of Islamic Jurisprudence’s review. This research was library research in which the qualitative data inferred was analysed by using content analysis. This research finds that a diversion is very much in line with Islamic law based on the principles of Islamic Jurisprudence’s review. Children are included in the category of do not have the expertise (legally incompetent) or have rudimentary skills so that they cannot be subjected to the law like an adult. There are many propositions that reinforce the conformity of a diversion with Islamic law. The Qur'an provides solutions for the settlement of cases outside of the court (non-litigation) known as negotiation and mediation. There are several hadiths that explain the treatment of children who make mistakes up to the level of tazir sanctions which all stand on the principle of education to children. There are other propositions such as sadd al-dhara’i with the intention of blocking the harm and urf with the intention of solving cases using customary law and local wisdom of the community. The concept of a diversion is also related to some rules such as special applicable laws, opportunities to apologize for mistakes that were made for the first time, and other rules

References

A. Djazuli. Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih. 7th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Abdu Wahhab al-Khallaf. Ilm Usul Al-Fiqh. Translated by Faiz el-Muttaqin. Jakarta: Pustaka Amani, 2003.

Abdul Aziz Muhammad Azzam. Al-Qawaid Al-Fiqhiyah. Kairo: Dar Hadis, 2005.

Abu Daud Sulaiman al-Sijitani. Sunan Abu Daud. 2. Bairut: Maktabah al-Asriyyah, n.d.

ÙAhmad bin Hajar al-Asqalani. Fath Al-Bari. Edited by 9. Bairut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1379.

Ahmad bin Hanbal. Musnad Ahmad. 5. Muassasah al-Risalah, 2001.

al-Mubarakfuri. Tuhfah Al-Ahwadz Bi Syarhi Jami’ Al-Tirmizi. 2. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, n.d.

al-Nawawi. Al-Adzkar. Bairut: Dar al-Fikr, 1994.

al-Sya’rawi. Tafsir Al-Sya’rawi. Muthabi Akhbar al-Yaum, 1997.

Al-Thabrani. Mu’jam Al-Kabir. 10. Kairo: Maktabah Ibnu Taimiyah, 1994.

Al-Tirmizi. Sunan Al-Tirmizi. Mesir: Maktabah Musthafa al-Babi al-Halabi, 1975.

Amir Syarifuddin. Ushul Fiqh. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Ibnu Majah. Sunan Ibnu Majah. 2. Bairut: Dar Ihya al-Kutub al-Arabiyah, n.d.

Ibnu Qayyim al-Jauziyah. ’Ilam Al-Muwaqi’in an Rabb Al-’Alamin. 1st ed. 3. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1991.

Krisnalita, Louisa Yesami. “Diversi Pada Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak.†Binamulia Hukum 8, no. 1 (2019): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v8i1.41.

Made Sepud. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Melalui Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Surabaya: R.A.De.Rozarie, 2013.

Mansur Abu Sa’id. Atsar Sigar Al-Sinni Fi Al-Masuliyyah Al-Janaiyah Fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Al-Qanun Al-Jazairi. al-Jazair: Jamiah al-Haj al-Hadhar, 2009.

Marlina. Pengantar Konsep Diversi Dan Restorative Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana. Medan: USU Press, 2010.

Muhammad bin Ismail al-Bukhari. Sahih Al-Bukhari. 3rd ed. Dar T{auq al-Najah, n.d.

Muhammad Syamsu al-Haq Abadi. Aun Al-Ma’bud Syarah Sunan Abu Daud. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1415.

R.Wiyono. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Satria Effendi M. Zain. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.

Setia Wahyudi. Implementasi Ide Diversi Dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2011.

Wahbah al-Zauhaili. Al-Wajiz Fi Usul Al-Fiqih. Damsyik: Dar al-Fikr, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Sakka, S. (2022). DIVERSI DALAM TINJAUAN USUL FIQH. MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.24256/maddika.v3i2.3312

Citation Check