Paradox of Bureaucracy Neutrality in The Indonesia Regional Election

Authors

  • Sukri Tamma Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v1i2.69

Keywords:

Bureaucracy, Neutrality, Regional Government, Civil Servant, Regional Election

Abstract

This paper aims provides how the actual issue of neutrality of Indonesian bureaucracy, especially on the Civil Servants of local government related to the Local election process. The important position of civil servants as public servants with its network touches many aspects of community life makes people as dependent on the bureaucracy existence. At the same time,
bureaucracy seems under the politicians' interests due to their position in the system of regional government. This study also simultaneously shows how the concept of neutrality implements in Indonesian bureaucracy associated with the Indonesian political system, including in the context of the regional government.

References

Adler, Paul S., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies:

Classical Foundations. Reprint edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford

University Press, 2010.

Agius, C., and K. Devine. “‘Neutrality: A Really Dead Concept?’ A Reprise.”

Cooperation and Conflict 46, no. 3 (September 1, 2011): 265–84.

doi:10.1177/0010836711416955.

Albrow, Martin. Bureaucracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1970.

Altay, Asuman. “The Efficiency of Bureaucracy on the Public Sector.” Dokuz

Eylül Üniversitesi ?ktisadi ve ?dari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 14, no. 2

(May 16, 2013). http://dergi.iibf.deu.edu.tr/index.php/cilt1-

sayi1/article/view/64.

Anthony Downs. “A Theory of Bureaucracy.” unpublised paper, November

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2008/P3031.

pdf.

Beetham, David. Bureaucracy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.

Blau, Peter M., and Marshall W. Meyer. Bureaucracy in Modern Society. 2nd

edition. New York: Random House USA Inc, 1988.

Jennings, Ian. Against State Neutrality Raz, Rawls, and Philosophical

Perfectionism. Saarbrücken: Südwestdeutscher Verlag für

Hochschulschriften, 2011. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-

Krause, George, and Kenneth J. Meier, eds. Politics, Policy, and Organizations:

Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy. Ann Arbor: University of

Michigan Press, 2005.

Miftah Thoha. Birokrasi Dan Politik Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo

Persada, 2003.

Miller, Gerald J., and Kaifeng Yang, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in

Public Administration, Second Edition. 2 edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press,

Müller, Wolfgang C. “Political Institutions and Linkage Strategies.” In Patrons,

Clients, and Policies, edited by Herbert Kitschelt and Steven I. Wilkinson,

–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511585869A020.

O. Tierean, and G.Bratucu. “The Evolution of the Concept of Bureaucracy.”

Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov 2, no. 51 (2009): 245–

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Expanded ed. Columbia Classics in

Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.

Sager, Fritz, and Christian Rosser. “Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of

Modern Bureaucracy.” Public Administration Review 69, no. 6

(November 2009): 1136–47. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02071.x.

Warwick, Donald P. A Theory of Public Bureaucracy: Politics, Personality, and

Organization in the State Department. Place of publication not

identified: Harvard University Press, 1979.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-18

Citation Check