Level Berpikir Geometri Menurut Teori Van Hiele Berdasarkan Kemampuan Geometri dan Perbedaan Gender Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 8 Pare-Pare

Authors

  • Lisa Aditya Dwiwansyah Musa IAIN Palopo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v4i2.255

Keywords:

Level in Thinking to Van Hiele Theory, Geometry Ability, Gender Differences.

Abstract

The study aimed at describing the level in thinking geometry according to Van Hiele theory based on geometry ability and gender differences. The subjects of the study were 4 people consisted of a male student with high geometry ability (LT), a female student with high geometry ability (PT), a male student with low geometry ability (LR), and a female student with low geometry ability (PR). The instrument of the study was the researcher herself as the main instrument assisted by test of geometry ability, test of Van Hiele, and guided interview which was valid and reliable. Data were collected by conducting test and test-based interview. The subject of the study grade VII students consisted of 4 people. The process of the study was conducted in several steps, namely (a) formulating the indicator of the level in thinking geometry according to Van Hiele theory based on the relevant theory and research, (b) formulating the supporting instrument (test of geometry ability, test of Van Hiele geometry, and guided interview) which was valid and reliable, (c) deciding the research subjects by providing test of geometry ability, (d) obtaining the data to reveal the level in thinking geometry of students on the characteristics of tetragon, (e) conducting time triangulation to obtain valid data, (f) conducting data analysis of the level in thinking geometry of students according to Van Hiele theory based on the geometry ability and gender differences, (g) conducting the discussion of the result of analysis, and (h) conducting conclusion drawing of the result of the study. The result of the study revealed that (1) the subject of LT was in level 2 of pre-ordering (unmaximized level 2), the subject had lack of understanding the correlation among planes in making the definition, (2) the subject of PT was in level 2 of pre-ordering (unmaximized level 2), the subject had lack of understanding the correlation among planes in making the definition, (3) the subject of LR was in level 1 of analysis, the subject could determine the characteristics of a plane; where as (4) the subject of PR was in level 1 of analysis, subject could determine the characteristics of a plane.

References

Adinawan, M Cholik, and Sugijono. Matematika Untuk SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2006.

Alimuddin. “Proses Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kreatif Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gender.” Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 2012.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2007.

BSNP. Standart Isi Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah. Jakarta, 2006.

Ferdianto, Ferry. “Pembelajaran Geometri Berdasarkan Tahap Berpikir Van Hiele,” 2010. http://ferrymath.blogspot.com.

Hidayat, Makmun. “Profil Keterampilan Dasar Geometri Siswa SMP/MTs dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri Materi Bangun Datar Segiempat ditinjau dari Gaya Belajarnya,” n.d. http://makmunhidayat.blogspot.com.

Hudojo, Herman. Pengembangan Kurikulum Dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Press, 2005.

J.A. Van De Walle. Sekolah Dasar Dan Menengah Matematika Pengembangan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2008.

Krutetskii, V. A. The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Chicago etc.: University Of Chicago Press, 1976.

Marsigit. Mathematics For Junior High School. Jakarta: Yudhistira, 2009.

Nurhayana, Erry Trisna, Nyoman Dantes, and Made Candiasa. “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Van Hiele Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Di Tinjau Dari Kemampuan Visualisasi Spasial Pada Siswa Kelas V Di Gugus Ii Kecamatan Buleleng.” Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Pendidikan Dasar 3 (n.d.).

Sugiyono. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2009.

Suherman, Erman. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2001.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009.

Tambunan, Siti Marliah. “Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Spasial Dengan Prestasi Belajar Matematika.” Makara, Sosial Humaniora 10, no. 1 (June 2006): 27–32.

Trianto. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivis. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher, 2007.

Downloads

Published

08-09-2018

How to Cite

Musa, L. A. D. (2018). Level Berpikir Geometri Menurut Teori Van Hiele Berdasarkan Kemampuan Geometri dan Perbedaan Gender Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 8 Pare-Pare. Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 4(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v4i2.255

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who wish to publish and disseminate their papers with the Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, shall agree to the publishing rights set by Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Authors understand that they shall assign publication rights as part of the process upon acceptance for publication. The authors agreed that they would transfer certain copyrights to Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Consecutively, authors still retain some rights to use and share their own published articles without written permission from Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam.

Authors granted Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam the following rights; (1) the right to publish and provide the manuscripts in all forms and media for publication and dissemination, (2) the authority to enforce the rights in the manuscript, for example in the case of plagiarism or in copyright infringement.

Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam will follow COPE's Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors to protect the research results and take allegations of any infringements, plagiarisms, ethical issues, and frauds should those issues arise. The manuscript is attributed as the authors' work, and is properly identified.