Student Interest in Mathematics using Routine and Non-Routine Problems in the Rotating Trio Exchange Cooperative Learning Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v11i1.2982Keywords:
Cooperative Learning Model, Rotating Trio Exchange, Routine vs Non-Routine Questions, Students' Interest.Abstract
Abstract:
Types of questions and the way the teacher teaches can affect student learning interests. One learning model that can increase students' interest in learning is the Rotating Trio Exchange cooperative learning model. This study examined the differences in students' learning interests using routine vs non-routine questions in the Rotating Trio Exchange cooperative learning model. The type of research used is quasi-experimental, with a sample of 44 junior high school students. The instruments used in this study were fractional material test questions, questionnaires, and observation sheets. Data analysis used a validity test, reliability test, normality test, homogeneity test, Wilcoxon test, and independent sample t-test. This study concluded that there were differences in the average learning interest of students who used routine and non-routine questions in the Rotating Trio Exchange cooperative learning model.
Abstrak:
Jenis pertanyaan dan cara guru mengajar dapat mempengaruhi minat belajar siswa. Salah satu model pembelajaran yang dapat meningkatkan minat belajar siswa adalah model pembelajaran kooperatif Rotating Trio Exchange. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah melihat perbedaan minat belajar matematika siswa yang menggunakan soal rutin vs non rutin pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Rotating Trio Exchange. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian Eksperimen Semu dengan jumlah sampel 44 siswa SMP. Instrumen digunakan penelitian ini adalah soal tes materi pecahan, angket dan lembar observasi. Analisis data menggunakan uji validitas, uji reliabitas, uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji wilcoxon dan uji independent sampel t-test. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan rata-rata minat belajar siswa yang menggunakan soal rutin dan non rutin pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Rotating Trio Exchange.
References
Abdillah, Abdillah, Ajeng Gelora Mastuti, Muhammad Rijal, and Muhajir Abd Rahman. “Students’ Intuitive and Analytical Thinking in the Mathematics Study through the Integration of STAD and Environmental Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh).†Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 11, no. 1 (June 24, 2020): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i1.6120.
Arifin, Sujinal, Zulkardi Zulkardi, Ratu Indra Putri, and Yusuf Hartono. “on Creativity Through Mathematization in Solving Non-Routine Problems.†Journal on Mathematics Education 12 (May 25, 2021): 313–30. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13885.313-330.
Arslan, Cigdem, and Yeliz Yazgan. “Common and Flexible Use of Mathematical Non Routine Problem Solving Strategies.†American Journal of Educational Research 3 (January 1, 2015): 1519–23. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-12-6.
Azmidar, Azmidar, Darhim Darhim, and Jarnawi Dahlan. “Enhancing Students’ Interest through Mathematics Learning.†Journal of Physics: Conference Series 895 (September 1, 2017): 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012072.
Chan, Liew Lee, and Noraini Idris. “Cooperative Learning in Mathematics Education.†International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7, no. 3 (2017): 15.
Darling-Hammond, Linda, Lisa Flook, Channa Cook-Harvey, Brigid Barron, and David Osher. “Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development.†Applied Developmental Science 24, no. 2 (April 2, 2020): 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
Dinç Artut, Perihan. “Effect of Cooperative Learning Method on Prospective Teachers’ Non-Routine Problem-Solving Skills and Their Views About the Method.†US-China Education Review A 6 (April 28, 2016). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2016.04.004.
Gokhale, Anu A. “Collaborative Learning and Critical Thinking.†In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited by Norbert M. Seel, 634–36. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_910.
Gunawan, Gunawan, A. Harjono, H. Sahidu, and Lovy Herayanti. “Virtual Laboratory to Improve Students’ Problem-Solving Skills on Electricity Concept.†Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 6 (October 1, 2017): 257–64. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9481.
Hasanah, Nor Fajariyatul, Mohammad Edy Nurtaman, and Umi Hanik. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Rotating Trio Exchange (RTE) terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Minat Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V SDN Pinggir Papas 1 Sumenep.†Widyagogik : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar 6, no. 2 (April 29, 2019): 112–21. https://doi.org/10.21107/widyagogik.v6i2.5195.
Jacobs, George M, and Willy A Renandya. Student Centered Cooperative Learning. SpringerBriefs in Education (BRIEFSEDUCAT), 2019. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-13-7213-1.
Johnson, David W., and Roger T. Johnson. Cooperative Learning: The Foundation for Active Learning. Active Learning - Beyond the Future. IntechOpen, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086.
Klang, Nina, Natalia Lebedeva Karlsson, Wiggo Kilborn, Pia Eriksson, and Martin Karlberg. “Mathematical Problem-Solving Through Cooperative Learning-The Importance of Peer Acceptance and Friendships.†Frontiers in Education 6 (August 24, 2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.710296.
Mahanal, Susriyati, Siti Zubaidah, Deny Setiawan, Hidayati Maghfiroh, and Fahrul Ghani Muhaimin. “Empowering College Students’ Problem-Solving Skills through RICOSRE.†Education Sciences 12, no. 3 (March 2022): 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030196.
Mastuti, Ajeng Gelora, Abdillah Abdillah, and Muhammad Rijal. “Teachers Promoting Mathematical Reasoning in Tasks.†JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika) 6, no. 2 (April 12, 2022): 371–85. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7339.
Mastuti, Ajeng Gelora, Abdillah Abdillah, Nurlaila Sehuwaky, and Ratna Risahondua. “Revealing Students’ Critical Thinking Ability According to Facione’s Theory.†Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 13, no. 2 (December 15, 2022): 261–72. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i2.13005.
Mastuti, Ajeng Gelora, and Lydia Lia Prayitno. “Exploring High School Teacher’s Design of Rich Algebra Tasks.†Jurnal Elemen 9, no. 1 (January 2, 2023): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.5851.
Mogari, David, and Munyaradzi Chirove. “Comparing Grades 10 – 12 Mathematics Learners’ Non-Routine Problem Solving.†EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13, no. 8 (July 21, 2017). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00946a.
Nguyen, Huy A., Yuqing Guo, John Stamper, and Bruce M. McLaren. “Improving Students’ Problem-Solving Flexibility in Non-Routine Mathematics.†Artificial Intelligence in Education 12164 (June 10, 2020): 409–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_74.
Novita, Rita, Zulkardi Zulkardi, and Yusuf Hartono. “Exploring Primary Student’s Problem-Solving Ability by Doing Tasks Like PISA’s Question.†Journal on Mathematics Education 3 (July 3, 2012). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.3.2.571.133-150.
Nursyahidah, Farida, Bagus Ardi Saputro, and Maya Rini Rubowo. “Students Problem Solving Ability Based on Realistic Mathematics with Ethnomathematics,†2018, 12.
Rahmawati, Anis Wahyu, Dwi Juniati, and Agung Lukito. “Algebraic Thinking Profiles of Junior High Schools’ Pupil in Mathematics Problem Solving.†International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research 2, no. 4 (December 30, 2019): 202–6. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i4.137.
Şahin, Şeyma, and Abdurrahman Kılıç. “Learning Model Based On Democratic Life.†Journal of Educational Research and Practice 11, no. 1 (September 13, 2021). https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2021.11.1.13.
Sharan, Yael. “Cooperative Learning for Academic and Social Gains: Valued Pedagogy, Problematic Practice.†European Journal of Education 45 (May 12, 2010): 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x.
Silberman, Melvin L. Active Learning; 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia, 2014.
———. Pembelajran Aktif 101 Strategi Untuk Mengajar Secara Aktif. Jakarta barat: PT Indeks, 2013.
Simamora, Rustam E., Sahat Saragih, and Hasratuddin Siregar. “Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context.†International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 14 (November 28, 2018). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966.
Yazgan, Yeliz, Çiğdem Arslan, and Hüseyin Ozan Gavaz. “Non-Routine Problem Solving and Strategy Flexibility: A Quasi-Experimental Study.†Journal of Pedagogical Research 5, no. 3 (July 10, 2021): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021370581.
Yeh, Charles Y. C., Hercy N. H. Cheng, Zhi-Hong Chen, Calvin C. Y. Liao, and Tak-Wai Chan. “Enhancing Achievement and Interest in Mathematics Learning through Math-Island.†Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 14, no. 1 (March 11, 2019): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9.
Yemi, Tukur, Madya Ruzlan, and Nurulwahida Azid. “Cooperative Learning: an Approach for Teaching Mathematics In Public School.†European Journal of Social Sciences Studies 2, no. 10 (December 1, 2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1173407.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who wish to publish and disseminate their papers with the Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, shall agree to the publishing rights set by Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Authors understand that they shall assign publication rights as part of the process upon acceptance for publication. The authors agreed that they would transfer certain copyrights to Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Consecutively, authors still retain some rights to use and share their own published articles without written permission from Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam.
Authors granted Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam the following rights; (1) the right to publish and provide the manuscripts in all forms and media for publication and dissemination, (2) the authority to enforce the rights in the manuscript, for example in the case of plagiarism or in copyright infringement.
Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam will follow COPE's Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors to protect the research results and take allegations of any infringements, plagiarisms, ethical issues, and frauds should those issues arise. The manuscript is attributed as the authors' work, and is properly identified.
