The Effect of a Creative-Problem Solving Learning Model Based on an Open-Ended Approach Toward High Level of Mathematical Thinking Ability of Students

Syilvia Septiani; Kana Hidayati

doi:10.24256/jpmipa.v12i2.5281

Authors

Syilvia Septiani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Kana Hidayati Universitas Negeri yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v12i2.5281

Keywords:

Adversity Quotient, Creative Problem Solving, Creative Thinking Skills, Mathematical Communication Skills

Abstract

Abstract:
Twenty-first-century learning focuses on developing students' mathematical thinking skills. This study examines the impact of the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) model using an Open-Ended approach to creative thinking, mathematical communication, and adversity quotient. The research employs a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group at a junior high school in Bukittinggi, Indonesia. Instruments used include tests for creative thinking skills, mathematical communication, and a questionnaire for adversity quotient. Analysis was conducted using Hotelling’s T2 and univariate tests, revealing that the CPS model positively influences all three abilities.

Abstrak:
Pembelajaran abad kedua puluh satu fokus pada pengembangan kemampuan berpikir matematis siswa. Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh model Creative Problem Solving (CPS) dengan pendekatan Open-Ended terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif, komunikasi matematis, dan adversity quotient. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain quasi eksperimen pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group di SMP di Bukittinggi, Indonesia, instrumen yang digunakan meliputi tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif, tes komunikasi matematis, dan angket adversity quotient. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan Hotelling’s T2 dan uji univariat, dengan hasil yang menunjukkan bahwa model CPS berpengaruh positif terhadap ketiga kemampuan tersebut.

References

Akhmad, Jazuli. “Berfikir Kreatif Dalam Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika.” In Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 2009, 209–20. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, 2009. http://www.uny.ac.id.

Becker, Jerry P., and Shigeru Shimada. The Open-Ended Approach: A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. ERIC, 1997.

Cojorn, Kanyarat. “Effects of the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Learning Model on Matter and Properties of Matter for Seventh Grade Students.” Journal of Education Khon Kaen University 35, no. 1 (March 2, 2016): 18–26. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDKKUJ/article/view/50458.

Debora, Emelia, Heffi Alberida, Ardi Ardi, and Siska Alicia Farma. “The Effect of Problem-Solving Learning Models on Creative Thinking Skills in Science Subjects.” Jurnal Biodukatika 8, no. 3 (October 30, 2020): 181–89. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i3.15858.

Faisal, Arif Setiawan, Sugeng Utaya, and Komang Astina. “The Effect of Creative Problem Solving Learning Model with Synectics Techniques Toward Student Creative Thinking Ability,” 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect-of-Creative-Problem-Solving-Learning-Setiawan-Utaya/03940fc622910f3a05c274de0652d9c14a4acd39.

Gundy, Arthur B Van. Creative Problem Solving: A Guide for Trainers and Management. New York: Praeger, 1987.

I Made Widiatmika, I Gusti Putu Suharta, and I Putu Pasek Suryawan. “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Penerapan Creative Problem Solving.” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha 10, no. 2 (September 3, 2019): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpm.v10i2.19905.

Keh, Lim Keng, Zaleha Ismail, and Yudariah Mohammad Yusof. “A Review of Open-Ended Mathematical Problem.” Anatolian Journal of Education 1, no. 1 (2016): 1–18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1245736.

Kusmanto, Hadi, and Iis Marliyana. “Pengaruh Pemahaman Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika Siswa Kelas VII Semester Genap SMP Negeri 2 Kasokandel Kabupaten Majalengka.” EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching‏‏‎ 3, no. 2 (November 14, 2014). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v3i2.56.

Noor, Naili Luma’ati. “Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Peserta Didik Melalui Open Ended Problem.” ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal 8, no. 2 (October 19, 2020): 209–24. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v8i2.8138.

Rolia, Rolia, Rosmaiyadi Rosmaiyadi, and Nurul Husna. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Materi Program Linier Kelas XI SMK.” VOX EDUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 8, no. 2 (2017): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v8i2.39.

Siagian, Muhammad Daut. “Kemampuan Koneksi Matematik Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika.” MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science 2, no. 1 (October 1, 2016): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.30743/mes.v2i1.117.

Silver, Edward A. “Fostering Creativity Through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing.” ZDM 29, no. 3 (June 1, 1997): 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x.

Stoltz, Paul G. Adversity Quotient Work: Finding Your Hidden Capacity For Getting Things Done. Harper Collins, 2010.

Stoltz, Paul Gordon. Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Grasindo, 2000.

Trilling, Bernie, and Charles Fadel. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

Viyani, Amelia Okta, Rizky Utami, and Agnita Siska Pramasdyahsari. “The Profile of Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability on Statistics Based on Adversity Quotient.” International Journal of Research in Education 2 (January 31, 2022): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v2i1.10819.

Wahyuningtyas, Febriana, Hardi Suyitno, and Mohammad Asikin. “Student’s Creative Thinking Skills Viewed by Adversity Quotient and Mathematics Anxiety in Grade VIII.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 9, no. 2 (December 23, 2020): 190–98. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/33171.

Windarti, Desti Hana, Wardono Wardono, and Scolastika Mariani. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient Pada Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Pendekatan Open-Ended.” JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika) 10, no. 2 (September 9, 2024): 458–66. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v10i2.6419.