Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman

Authors

  • Sri Hariyani Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang, Indonesia
  • Verena Cony Aldita Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v8i1.805

Keywords:

Errors Analysis, Mathematical Story Question, Newman Procedure.

Abstract

Abstract:

Students often make mistakes in changing questions into mathematical models. Based on the results of the interview, the ability of students to solve story problems in the discussion of the Linear Equation System of Two Variables has not reached 50%. This study aims to analyze the types of mistakes made by students of class VIIIA SMP PGRI 06 Malang in solving mathematical story problems based on Newman's procedures. The instrument used was a written test that contained 4 questions and interview questions. The data validity technique used is source triangulation. Analysis of the data used is data reduction, data presentation, and concluding. The results showed: (1) 2 research subjects made mistakes at the reading stage; (2) 5 research subjects made mistakes at the understanding stage; (3) 5 research subjects made a transformation error; (4) 4 research subjects made mistakes at the process skills stage; (5) 5 research subjects made mistakes at the writing of the answers; and (6) 6 research subjects made mistakes at the carelessness stage.

Abstrak:

Siswa sering melakukan kesalahan dalam mengubah soal ke dalam bentuk model matematika. Berdasarkan hasil wawancara, kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada bahasan Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel belum mencapai 50%. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis jenis kesalahan yang dilakukan siswa kelas VIIIA SMP PGRI 06 Malang dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan prosedur Newman. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes tertulis yang memuat 4 soal uraian dan wawancara. Teknik keabsahan data yang digunakan adalah triangulasi sumber. Analisis data yang digunakan yakni reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) 2 subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan pada tahap membaca; (2) 5 subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan pada tahap memahami; (3) 5 subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan transformasi; (4) 4 subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan pada tahap keterampilan proses; (5) 5 subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan pada tahap penulisan jawaban; dan (6) 6 subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan pada tahap kecerobohan.

References

Ardiawan, Yadi. “Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Induksi Matematika Di Ikip Pgri Pontianak.†Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains 4, no. 1 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v4i1.13.

Hariyani, Sri. “Errors Identification In Solving Arithmetic Problems.†In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, 1:357–360, 2018.

Hariyani, Sri, Neni Ningsih, and Trija Fayeldi. “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Lingkaran Berdasarkan Kategori Watson.†UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika 7, no. 2 (2019): 187–200.

Idris, Ridwan. “Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Dengan Pendekatan Psikologi Kognitif.†Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan 12, no. 2 (2017): 152–172. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2009v12n2a3.

Istiqomah, Nurul. “Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Siswa Kelas Xi SMK Tamtama Karanganyar Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014.†UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika 4, no. 2 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/.v4i2.458.

Jeharut, Erdiana Harniati Murni, Sri Hariyani, and Tri Candra Wulandari. “Analisis Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman Ditinjau Dari Gender.†Semnas SENASTEK Unikama 2019 2 (2019).

Jha, Shio Kumar. “Mathematics Performance of Primary School Students in Assam (India): An Analysis Using Newman Procedure.†International Journal of Computer Applications in Engineering Sciences 2, no. 1 (2012): 17–21.

J.Moleong, Lexi. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2015.

Karnasih, Ida. “Analisis Kesalahan Newman Pada Soal Cerita Matematis (Newman’s Error Analysis in Mathematical Word Problems).†PARADIKMA JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA 8, no. 1 (April 28, 2015). https://doi.org/10.24114/paradikma.v8i1.3352.

Satoto, Seto, Hery Sutarto, and Emi Pujiastuti. “Analisis Kesalahan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Dengan Prosedur Newman.†Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education 1, no. 2 (2012).

Singh, Parmjit, Arba Abdul Rahman, and Teoh Sian Hoon. “The Newman Procedure for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks: A Malaysian Perspective.†Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 8 (2010): 264–271.

Sudjana. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitaf Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.

Sumarmo, Utari. “Berpikir Dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa, Dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan Pada Peserta Didik.†Bandung: FPMIPA UPI, 2010.

Sunardiningsih, Ganik Wahyuningtias, Sri Hariyani, and Trija Fayeldi. “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Analisis Newman.†RAINSTEK: Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi 1, no. 2 (2019): 41–45.

Suyitno, Amin, and Hardi Suyitno. “Learning Therapy for Students in Mathematics Communication Correctly Based-on Application of Newman Procedure (a Case of Indonesian Student).†International Journal of Education and Research 3, no. 1 (2015): 529–538.

White, Allan Leslie. “Numeracy, Literacy and Newman’s Error Analysis.†Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia 33, no. 2 (2010): 129–148.

Downloads

Published

11-04-2020

How to Cite

Hariyani, S., & Aldita, V. C. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 8(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v8i1.805

Citation Check