Tipe Justifikasi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v8i1.975Keywords:
Justification, Mathematics Problem.Abstract
Abstract:
This study aims to describe the Justification Type of Islamic primary school students in Learning There are three cognitive processes that occur in learning mathematics, namely (1) The process of acquiring new information (2) The process of transforming information received (3) Testing the relevance and accuracy of knowledge, The research approach used in this study is qualitative research. This study involved grade 5 Islamic primary school al Bahjah Tulungagung Students as research subjects. The instruments in this study were of two kinds, namely the main instrument and the assistive instrument. The main instrument is the researcher himself, while there are 2 (two) types of assistive instruments, namely: Mathematics Test and interview guidelines. The results of this study are descriptions of each type of justification, at the Assumption (2) Vague / broad statement stage. (3) Rule, (4) Procedural description. (5) Own explanation. In this study, one type of justification was found, namely the experiential connection.
Abstrak:
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan Tipe Justifikasi pada siswa SD dalam Pembelajaran Ada tiga proses kognitif yang terjadi dalam belajar, yaitu (1) Proses perolehan informasi baru (2) Proses mentransformasikan informasi yang diterima (3) Menguji relevansi dan ketepatan pengetahuan, Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Penelitian ini melibatkan 5 Siswa SD Islam Al Bahjah Tulungagung sebagai subjek penelitian. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini ada dua macam, yaitu instrumen utama dan instrumen bantu. Instrumen utama adalah peneliti sendiri, sedangkan instrumen bantu ada 2 (dua) macam, yaitu: Tes Matematika dan pedoman wawancara. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah deskripsi dari masing-masing tipe justifikasi, pada tahap Assumption (2) Vague/broad statement. (3) Rule, (4) Procedural description. (5) Own explanation. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan satu tipe justifikasi yaitu eksperience connection.
References
Amorim, Marta Élid, Ruy César Pietropaolo, and Arthur Belford Powell. “Knowledge for Teaching Justifications and Proofs for Future Mathematics Teachers.†Acta Scientiae 21, no. 5 (2019): 81–101.
As’ari, Abdur Rahman. “Integrasi Budaya, Psikologi, Dan Teknologi Dalam Membangun Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya.†In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2018.
Back, Ralph-Johan, Linda Mannila, and Solveig Wallin. “Student Justifications in High School Mathematics.†In Proceedings of CERME, 6:291–300, 2010.
Ball, D.L., and Hyman Bass. “Making Mathematics Reasonable in School.†A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, January 1, 2003, 27–44.
Brodie, Karin. Teaching Mathematical Reasoning in Secondary School Classrooms. Vol. 775. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
Glass, Barbara, and Carolyn A. Maher. “Students’ Problem Solving and Justification.†International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2004, 463–70.
J.Moleong, Lexi. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2015.
Kidron, Ivy, and Tommy Dreyfus. “Justification Enlightenment and Combining Constructions of Knowledge.†Educational Studies in Mathematics 74, no. 1 (May 1, 2010): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9228-7.
Lo, Jane-Jane, Theresa J. Grant, and Judith Flowers. “Challenges in Deepening Prospective Teachers’ Understanding of Multiplication Through Justification.†Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11, no. 1 (2008): 5–22.
Mason, Mark. “Critical Thinking and Learning.†Educational Philosophy and Theory 39, no. 4 (2007): 339–349.
Nafi’an, Muhammad Ilman. “Bagaimana Kemampuan Siswa Sd Dengan Gaya Kognitif Field Independen Memecahkan Masalah Matematika?†Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Anak Sekolah Dasar 1, no. 02 (2016).
National Council of Teachers of Mathematic. “Executive Summary Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.†Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (blog), 2004. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PSSM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who wish to publish and disseminate their papers with the Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, shall agree to the publishing rights set by Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Authors understand that they shall assign publication rights as part of the process upon acceptance for publication. The authors agreed that they would transfer certain copyrights to Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Consecutively, authors still retain some rights to use and share their own published articles without written permission from Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam.
Authors granted Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam the following rights; (1) the right to publish and provide the manuscripts in all forms and media for publication and dissemination, (2) the authority to enforce the rights in the manuscript, for example in the case of plagiarism or in copyright infringement.
Al-Khwarizmi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam will follow COPE's Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors to protect the research results and take allegations of any infringements, plagiarisms, ethical issues, and frauds should those issues arise. The manuscript is attributed as the authors' work, and is properly identified.
