POLEMIK MUNASABAH SEBAGAI METODE KAJIAN TAFSIR (Kajian Metodolgi Tafsir Ulama Klasik)
Abstract
One of classical methods of interpretation in question were reinterpretations. munasabah with forceThe means by which an interlocking munasabah meaning in all aspects of paragraph with distance and, different charges give rise to criticism that explicitly according to the priest syaukani, rather than increase it will obviously meaning quran but rather will increase doubts and confusion. This study said pengklasifikasian classical and methodology in the form of ma’tsur and ra’yi and principle in the use of each of them and an order, verse order tauqifi, ijtihadi and led to the use and recognition of munasabah as exegesis methodology.
References
Arif, Armei, Pengantar Ilmu dan Metodologi Pendidikan Islam, Jakarta: Ciputat Press, 2002
Al-Anshari al-Qurtubi, Abu Abdillah Mu-hammad, Tafsir al-Qurtubi, Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Urbah, 1969.
Depatremen Agama RI, al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya, (Jakarta: Yayasan Penye-lenggara/Penafsir al-Qur’an, 2005.
Mardan, Ulum al-Qur’an; Sebuah Pengantar, Jakarta: Mazhab Ciputat, 2010.
Asy-Syarif bin Mahmud, al-Amtsal fi al-Qur’an, Mesir: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1965.
As-Shiddieqy, Hasbi, Ilmu al-Qur’an, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1972
Syafi’i, Rahmat, Pengantar Ilmu Tafsir, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2006.
Shihab, M. Quraish, Tafsir al-Misbah, Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2006
Al-Qattan,Manna, Mabahis fi Ulum al-Qur’an, Kairo: Dar al-Taufik, 2005.
Syahidin, Menelusuri Metode Pendidikan dlm Al-Qur’an, Jakarta: Alfabet, 2009.
Salam, Zaghllul, Atsar al-Qur’an fi Ta-thawwur al-Naqd al-Adabi, Mesir: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1968.
