Regional Disparities and Determinants of Poverty in Papua: Klassen Typology Analysis and Panel Data Regression

Authors

  • Sanefaro Infun J Department of Economics and Development Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia., Indonesia
  • Evi Gravitiani Department of Economics and Development Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia., Indonesia
  • Sarjiyanto Department of Economics and Development Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia., Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i2.10190

Keywords:

Disparities, Poverty, Klassen Typologi, Panel Data Regression

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze economic development imbalances in various districts/cities in Papua and the determinants of poverty levels by applying Klassen's typology and panel data regression. The results of mapping using Klassen's typology indicate that most districts/cities in Papua are located in Quadrant IV (relatively underdeveloped areas) with lower average per capita income and economic growth compared to the provincial average. This situation is generally experienced by isolated mountainous and coastal areas that face problems in terms of infrastructure, accessibility, and dependence on traditional primary sectors. Meanwhile, panel data regression analysis using the Fixed Effect Model reveals that per capita income and income inequality (Gini Ratio) contribute positively and significantly to an increase in poverty rates. Conversely, the Human Development Index (HDI) has a negative and significant influence, indicating that improvements in the quality of education, health, and living standards can help reduce poverty rates. Meanwhile, economic growth and the open unemployment rate (Unemp) do not show a significant impact in explaining poverty variations. These findings indicate that Papua's development strategy needs to focus on strengthening the HDI and more equitable distribution of development outcomes so that economic growth can have a more inclusive impact

References

Akman Baizatul, & Sapha Diana. (2018). Pengaruh Korupsi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM), 3(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v4i1.677

Alfada, A. (2019). The destructive effect of corruption on economic growth in Indonesia : A threshold model. Heliyon, 5(April).

Ayana, I. D., Demissie, W. M., & Sore, A. G. (2024). On the government revenue on economic growth of Sub-Saharan Africa: Does institutional quality matter? Heliyon, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24319

Damanik, D., & Marta Saragih. (2023). Pandangan Korupsi, Inflasi dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di ASEAN. EKUILNOMI: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 5(1).

Fajar, M., & Azhar, Z. (2019). Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Dan Pembangunan Manusia Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Negara-Negara Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Ecogen, 1(3), 681. https://doi.org/10.24036/jmpe.v1i3.5114

Fera Kristina, FriskillaAngeliani, Nurhayati, Hidayati, N. F., Malaifani, S. R. O., & Arief Sadjiarto, L. R. (2022). View of Pengaruh Pengangguran Dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat, 7(2), 299–314.

Gründler, K., & Potrafke, N. (2019). Economy Corruption and economic growth : New empirical evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 60(August), 1–14.

Hazmi, R. A. Al. (2024). Pengaruh Kemiskinan Dan Korupsi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnalku, 4(1), 1–10.

Lutfi, A. F., Diartho, H. C., Ilmu, J., Pembangunan, S., Ekonomi, F., Unej, U. J., & Kalimantan, J. (2020). Dampak Korupsi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi : Studi Kasus 4 Negara di ASEAN. e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, VII(1995), 30–35.

Mukaromah, L., Zakia Hanifatuzzahra, AdeNasrullah, Latifah, T. M., Purwaningsih, V. T., & Suparta, I. W. (2022). Pengaruh Indeks Pembangunan Manusia, Tingkat Upah Minimum, Dan Tingkat Pengangguran Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Tahun 2022. Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Flores, 13(2), 228–245.

Ofori, P. E., Kuuwill, A., & Quaye, B. (2024). Effect of human capital development and institutional quality on inclusive growth in African countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2357155

Sri Nawatmi. (2016). Pengaruh Korupsi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Studi Empiris Negara-Negara Asia Pasifik. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 31(1), 14–25.

Sujidno, R., & Febriani, R. E. (2023). Pengaruh Korupsi, Pengeluaran Pemerintah dan Jumlah Uang Beredar (M2) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di ASEAN. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v9i2.202

Tohari, M. (2022). Dampak Korupsi Terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Politik. JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia), 3(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v3i02.381

Triatmanto, B., & Bawono, S. (2023). The interplay of corruption, human capital, and unemployment in Indonesia: Implications for economic development. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2(September).

Uroos, A., Shahzad, M., Umar, M., & Yahya, G. (2022). Economic analysis of corruption : evidence from Pakistan. TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS REVIEW, 14(1), 46–61.

Winarti, V. P., Fyesya Erliantari, & Desmawan, D. (2022). Pengaruh Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Provinsi Banten 2017 – 2021. Jurnal Ekuilnomi, 4(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.36985/ekuilnomi.v4i2.454

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Sanefaro Infun J, Evi Gravitiani, & Sarjiyanto. (2026). Regional Disparities and Determinants of Poverty in Papua: Klassen Typology Analysis and Panel Data Regression. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i2.10190

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.