The Effect of Knowledge Sharing and Digital Competence on Innovative Work Behavior with Thriving at Work as an Intervening Variable Among Echelon II Officials in West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government

Authors

  • Zahrul Martayadi Mataram University
  • Thatok Asmony Universitas Mataram
  • Siti Nurmayanti Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i2.10489

Keywords:

Knowledge Sharing, Digital Competence, Innovative Work Behavior, Thriving At Work, Public Sector, SEM-PLS

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of knowledge sharing and digital competence on innovative work behavior, with thriving at work as an intervening variable, among Echelon II Officials of the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government, Indonesia. A quantitative causal research design was employed using census sampling covering all 41 Heads of Regional Apparatus Organizations, with data collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with bootstrapping procedures, drawing on theoretical frameworks from Jong & Den Hartog, Matzler et al., Ferrari's DigComp 2.2, and Spreitzer & Porath. Of seven hypotheses examined, five were supported: knowledge sharing did not directly influence innovative work behavior but significantly predicted thriving at work, which fully mediated the knowledge sharing–innovative work behavior relationship, while digital competence directly and positively influenced both innovative work behavior and thriving at work, though thriving at work did not mediate the digital competence innovative work behavior path. These findings suggest that digital competence serves as a direct driver of public sector innovation, whereas knowledge sharing operates through employees' psychological well-being, implying that the NTB Provincial Government should prioritize strategic digital leadership programs and cultivate reflective knowledge-sharing cultures, with future research encouraged to adopt longitudinal designs and examine additional mediators such as organizational climate and leadership style.

References

Alwahabi, N., Dukhaykh, S., & Alonazi, W. B. (2023). Thriving at work as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Sustainability, 15(15), 11540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511540

Arofah, L., Ratnasari, S. L., & Susanti, Y. (2024). Thriving at work and innovative work behavior among start-up employees. Asian Journal of Business Research, 14(1), 55–72.

Badan Riset dan Inovasi Daerah Provinsi NTB. (2026). Laporan indeks inovasi daerah Provinsi NTB tahun 2020–2025. BRIDA NTB.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Carvalho, A., Pinheiro, M., Craveiro, I., & Dias, C. (2023). Digital competence and innovative work behavior in higher education institutions. Computers & Education, 196, 104730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104730

Cetin, M., & Aydın, A. (2024). Thriving at work as a mediator between work engagement and innovative work behavior. Current Psychology, 43(1), 892–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04043-w

Chen, L., Li, W., & Liu, J. (2024). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior in the public sector: The role of digital capability. Information & Management, 61(1), 103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103877

Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hooff, B. V. D., & Ridder, J. A. D. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.571

Li, R., Zhang, X., & Chen, L. (2023). Digital competence, learning agility, and thriving at work among Chinese knowledge workers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1078912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078912

Mariani, M., & Bianchi, C. (2023). Digital transformation in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(3), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2091843

Masyhuri, M., Prabandari, Y., & Kurniawati, E. (2024). Human capital 4.0 and thriving at work among branch managers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(2), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2023-0484

Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Müller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.06.004

Meidawati, N., Subyantoro, A., & Hikmah, F. (2023). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior among Indonesian academic staff. Journal of Indonesian Management, 23(1), 67–82.

Mutafanin, M., & Muzakki, A. (2025). The effect of transformational leadership and knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior. Journal of Indonesian Management Studies, 8(1), 45–61.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

Ononye, U., & Ikechukwu, D. A. (2024). Knowledge sharing and thriving at work among academic staff in Nigeria. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 22(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2278410

Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2023). Thriving at work: An updating meta-analysis and review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000348

Sary, F. P. (2023). Digital competency and innovative work behavior among teachers. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i2.4682

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701

Solimun, S. (2017). Multivariate research methods: Structural equation model–partial least square in social research. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153

Spreitzer, G. M., & Porath, C. (2014). Self-determination as a nutriment for thriving: Building an integrative model of human growth at work. In M. Gagné (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 168–187). Oxford University Press.

Suhada, R., Wibowo, A., & Santoso, B. (2024). Digital skills and innovative work behavior among millennial workers in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.08.001

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017

Wahyuni, R., & Rahman, T. (2025). Digital job resources and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of digital engagement. Journal of Indonesian Business Research, 10(1), 78–94.

Wang, C. (2025). Knowledge sharing and thriving at work: Evidence from Chinese employees. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(1), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2024-0504

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

Martayadi, Z., Thatok Asmony, & Siti Nurmayanti. (2026). The Effect of Knowledge Sharing and Digital Competence on Innovative Work Behavior with Thriving at Work as an Intervening Variable Among Echelon II Officials in West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i2.10489

Similar Articles

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.