Malay Leadership Model from an Institutional Economic Perspective in the Riau Islands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i2.10830Keywords:
Malay Leadership, Local Wisdom, Culture-Based Leadership, Riau Islands, Contemporary LeadershipAbstract
This study examines the Malay leadership model in the Riau Islands, which is rooted in local cultural values, particularly trust, etiquette, deliberation, and moral responsibility in leadership practices. The objectives of this study are to understand the meaning of Malay leadership, identify its distinctive characteristics compared to other leadership models, and analyze its relevance in the context of contemporary leadership challenges. This study employs a qualitative approach by collecting primary data through interviews and observations, supported by documentary studies as secondary data sources.The findings reveal that Malay leadership emphasizes harmony between spiritual, moral, and social values. The core characteristics of this leadership model include integrity, honesty, wisdom, politeness, and the balance between inner and outer character. In addition, the principles of deliberation (musyawarah), consensus-building, and maintaining social harmony serve as the foundation for decision-making processes within society and organizations. The study also finds that the preservation of Malay leadership values is conducted through succession processes managed by customary institutions, which play an important role in shaping future leaders with strong moral character and cultural awareness. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the Malay leadership model in the Riau Islands as a local culture-based leadership framework, which has received limited attention in previous leadership studies. Unlike prior research that predominantly discusses universal leadership theories such as transformational or transactional leadership, this study specifically explores the integration of Malay cultural values into leadership practices and examines their relevance in contemporary organizational and social contexts. Therefore, this study contributes to strengthening leadership studies based on local wisdom and offers an adaptive, culturally grounded, and sustainable alternative leadership model.
References
Ardiasnyah, T., & Awaloedin, D. T. (2021). Model kepemimpinan tepat dalam mempengaruhi kinerja dosen perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Populis: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 6(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.47313/pjsh.v6i1.1075
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Candra, D. M. (2024). Teori dan gaya kepemimpinan dalam membentuk karakter dan SDM yang unggul. Rimba: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Agama Islam, 2(3), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.61132/rimba.v2i3.1166
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Kamal, F., Winarso, W., & Sulistio, E. (2019). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja karyawan. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 15(2), 38–49.
Koentjaraningrat. (1984). Kebudayaan Jawa. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Mulyana, G. (2021). Model kepemimpinan untuk transformasi e-government di Indonesia. AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional, 3(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.54783/jin.v3i1.360
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Nurrisa, F., Hermina, D., & Norlaila. (2025). Pendekatan kualitatif dalam penelitian: Strategi, tahapan, dan analisis data. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JTTP), 2(3), 793–800.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York, NY: Free Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
Sulastri, Suyono, & Dewi, R. S. I. (2024). Teori dan model kepemimpinan pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 8(3), 49182–49188.
Teruna, D., & Ardiansyah, T. (2021). Model gaya kepemimpinan pada perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen, 19(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.52330/jtm.v19i1.18
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chairinnisa’Ramadhani, Meisya Tania Putri, Melsa Santiya, Satriadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. In line with the license, authors are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
