Legal Liability of the Board of Directors for Errors in Withholding and Reporting of Employee Income Tax

Authors

  • Feriawan Ardiawanto Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.11782

Keywords:

Board of Directors, Fiduciary Duty, Business Judgment Rule, Tax Liability, PPh

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal liability of the Board of Directors regarding the mismanagement of PPh 21 (Employee Income Tax) by subordinates, amidst the ongoing tension between the doctrine of limited liability under the Law on Limited Liability Companies and the concept of personal liability for corporate officers under Tax Law. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case-law approaches, this research examines the juridical qualification of delegated authority through the lens of fiduciary duty and the Business Judgment Rule (BJR). The findings indicate that the delegation of payroll management is a legally valid operational action. Following the Constitutional Court Decision Number 41/PUU-XVIII/2020, the paradigm of the Board of Directors' legal liability has shifted from strict liability to fault-based liability. The Directors are shielded from personal liability provided they can demonstrate the implementation of adequate internal control systems (due care) and the absence of criminal intent (mens rea). Liability for administrative tax sanctions rests upon corporate assets, while criminal liability for tax embezzlement committed by individual employees is personal and cannot be automatically imputed to the Directors.

References

Diarsa, K. O. F., Yuniati, E., Syam, S., & Akbar, T. Y. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi direksi atas tagihan pajak yang masih terutang pasca pemberesan harta pailit. Notaire, 6(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v6i2.43650

Haetami, V., Abas, M., Rahmatiar, Y., & Lubis, A. (2024). Tinjauan normatif tentang tanggung jawab direksi terhadap karyawan yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum memberikan diskon secara sepihak ditinjau dari doktrin piercing the corporate veil dan dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Putusan Nomor 1666 K/Pdt/2022). UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8953. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3

Muhayatsyah, A. (2019). Keputusan bisnis dan tanggungjawab direksi dalam prinsip fiduciary duties pada perseroan terbatas. At-Tijarah, 1(2), 37–56.

Noer, M. H. G., & Handoko, W. (2023). Pelaksanaan prinsip business judgment rule (BJR) oleh direksi pada PT. Tirta Amarta Bottling Company. Notarius, 16(3), 1392.

Putri, H. R., Irawanto, A. R., & Rafiqi, A. A. (2026). Analisis pertanggungjawaban komisaris terhadap utang pajak perseroan atas kasus penyanderaan Nyonya Mw. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 6(2), 34052–34061.

Rahmah, U. F. (2023). Kewenangan direksi dalam pengurusan perseroan terbatas. Lex Economica Journal, 1(1).

Syakir, A. P., & Sodikin. (2025). Penerapan prinsip fiduciary duty untuk mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance dalam perseroan terbatas. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i2.3655

Tobing, N. M. B., Nainggolan, A., & Siringoringo, P. (2023). Pelaksanaan prinsip tanggung jawab terbatas direksi atas utang pajak perseroan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 41/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jurnal Hukum To-ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 9(Special Issue), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.55809/to-ra.v9iSpecialIssue.254

Wahyono, & Cahyo. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban direksi dalam UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas: Studi kasus korporasi multinasional. IBLAM Law Review, 5(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i2.634

Wiranti, W. (2022). Tanggung jawab pengurus perseroan atas tunggakan pajak perseroan berdasarkan prinsip fiduciary duty. Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v4i2.3043

Downloads

Published

2026-07-19

How to Cite

Ardiawanto, F. (2026). Legal Liability of the Board of Directors for Errors in Withholding and Reporting of Employee Income Tax. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.11782

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.