Procedures For Resolving Islamic Economic Disputes In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v7i4.7725Keywords:
Sharia economics, murabahah, contract, procedure, religious courts, dispute, judge's consideration, judge's decisionAbstract
This research is titled Efforts to Resolve Sharia Economic Disputes at the Central Jakarta Religious Court through a case study of Decision No. 634/Pdt.G/2024/PA. JP. The purpose of this research is to delve deeper into the procedures and basis for judges' considerations in deciding case number 634/Pdt.G/2024/PA. JP at the Central Jakarta Religious Court. Then to find out the views of Sharia Economic Law on the basis of consideration by the Central Jakarta Religious Court Judge in deciding a case that declares the validity and value of Defendant II's non-Muslim property as a guarantee for the payment of obligations from Defendant I. This research uses a normative method with a juridical approach, examining laws and regulations, court decisions, and related literature. Based on the research method, a study was produced that revealed that in principle the procedure for resolving sharia economic disputes at the Central Jakarta Religious Court is the same as other courts in Indonesia, starting from the registration of the case by the plaintiff, the examination of the file and the determination of the panel of judges, the summoning of the parties (plaintiff and the defendant), the first hearing and peace efforts (mediation), the reading of the lawsuit, the defendant's answer (exception and subject matter), Replica of the plaintiff, duplicate of the plaintiff, proof, conclusion of the parties, deliberation of the panel of judges, reading of the decision and legal remedies if any. However, there are separate rules in the Central Jakarta Religious Court such as divorce. The final conclusion of this study is that the settlement of sharia economic disputes at the Central Jakarta Religious Court has been carried out in accordance with positive legal procedures and sharia principles, although there are still some challenges in its implementation.
References
Amriani, Nurnaningsih, (2012). Mediasi: Aternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
A Rasyid, Roihan, (2005). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Cet. Ke- 11
Ahmaddiono, (2021), Manajemen Pembiayaan Bank Syariah, Jember, IAIN Jember Press.
Azma, Ummi, (2017) Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Bekasi, Nurani, VOL. 17, NO. 2, Desember 2017: 87 – 100.
Al-Fauzan, Saleh, (2005), Fiqih Sehari-hari, Jakarta, Gema Insani.
A. Mas’adi, Gufron, (2002), Fiqh Muamalah Kontekstual, Ed 1, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Baridwan, Zaki, (2009). Sistem Akuntansi Penyusunan Prosedur dan Metode, Yogyakarta: BPFE, Edisi 5
Basir, Cik (2010). Beberapa Hal Penting Yang Harus Dipahami Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum dan Peradilan, Edisi Nomor 72
Boboy, Tarochi, Juwita, Budi Santoso dan Irawati, (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi Berdasarkan Teori Dean G.Pruitt Dan Jeffrey Z.Rubin, Jurnal Notarius, Volume 13 Nomor 2
Chomzah, Ali Achmad, (2003), Seri Hukum Pertanahan III Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah dan Seri Hukum Pertanahan IV Pengadaan Tanah Instansi Pemerintah, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta.
Dean G, Pruitt. & Z. Rubin, (2004) Teori Konflik Social, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Dermina. Dalimunthe, (2017), Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Perspektif Kitab Undangundang Hukum Perdata (Bw). Jurnal Al-Maqasid. Volume 3. Issue 1 (Januari) 2017.
Ghony, M. Djunaidi dan Fauzan Almmanshur, (2016) Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Yogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Hidayah, Hairul, (2022).M.Pd.I, Buku Ajar Fiqih Ibadah dan Muamalah, Lombok: CV. Alfa Press.
Hariyanto, Erie, (2014), Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia, Iqtishadia Vol. 1 No. 1 Juni, 2014.
Hasan, Akhmad Farroh, (2018), Fiqh Muammalah dari Klasik hingga Kontemporer (Teori dan Praktek), Malang: UIN-Maliki Malang Press, Cet. 1.
https://pa-talu.go.id/proses-penyelesaian-perkara/
https://www.pa-bengkayang.go.id/id/layanan-hukum/proses-penyelesaian-perkara
https://www.pa-bengkayang.go.id/id/layanan-hukum/proses-penyelesaian-perkara
Halim, Abdillah, (2022). Investama, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Volume 08 Nomor 02 (September)
Ibrahim, Azharsyah dkk, (2021). Pengantar Ekonomi Islam, Jakarta: Departemen Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah - Bank Indonesia.
Inayah, Ina Nur, (2020), Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi dan Bisnis Syariah, Volume II, Nomor 02, Juli 2020, hlm. 96
KBBI Daring, Sengketa, diakses dari https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/sengketa tanggal 30 Desember 2019
Kencanawati, Erny, (2021), Koherensi Asas Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Dengan Asas, Bandung, Alumni.
Mafaid, Ahmad dkk., (2022), Peradilan Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Banyumas: CV. Amerta Media.
Masrukhin, (2015), Metodologi Penelitia Kualitatif Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Kudus: Media ilmu Press.
Mardani, Hukum Perikatan Syariah di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mujahidin, Ahmad, (2008) Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Indonesia, Jakarta: Ikahi (Ikatan Hakim Indonesia).
Musfiqoh, Siti. (2011). “Kilas Balik Ekonomi Islam Di Indonesia”. El-Qist: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam (JIEB) 1 (1). Surabaya, Indonesia:1-14. https://doi.org/10.15642/elqist.2011.1.1.1-14.
Manan, Abdul, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama.
Irwan Misbach, (2020), Ekonomi Syariah, Gowa: Alauddin University Press.
Mujahidin, Ahmad, (2008), Pembaharuan Hukum Acara PerdataPeradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iyyah di Indonesia, IKAHI, Jakarta.
Masse, Rahman Abo dan Muhammad Rusli, (2017), Arbitrase Syariah (Formalisasi Hukum Islam Dalam Ranah Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Secara Nonlitigasi), Jakarta, Trustmedia Publishing.
Mujahidin, Ahmad (2018), Ruang Lingkup dan Praktik Mediasi Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah, (Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Mujahidin, M., Imran, M., Sapa, N., Fasiha, F., Aisya, S., & Trimulato, T. (2025). Challenge of Waqf to the Social and Economic Welfare of Muslim Communities: A Comparative Analysis Between Countries. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, 12(1), 168-184. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.7765
Manulang, Rinto, (2011), Segala Hal Tentang Tanah, Rumah & Perizinannya, Jakarta: Buku Pintar.
Narko, (2007), Sistem Akuntansi, Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Nusantara.
Nofiardi, (2021). Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Penyelesaian Hukum Di Pengadilan Dan Lembaga Keuangan, Bandarlampung: Pusaka Media.
Nugraha, Aldi, (2023), Nova Naysila Pargianto, Sella Aprillia, Kajian Literatur: Penerapan Prinsip Syariah Dalam Mengatasi Masalah Riba Pada Bank Syariah, (Jurnal Religion: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya Volume 1, Nomor 4, 2023), hlm. 229
Pradja, Juhaya S. (2012 Ekonomi Syariah, Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah, (2014), Himpunan Putusan Tarjih Muhammadiyah (HPT), Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah.
Rahmadi, Takdir, (2011), Mediasi : Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Rianto, Nur, (2012). Lembaga Keuangan Syariah, Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Rofiah, Khusniati, (2022), Penyelesaian Ekonomi Syariah, Ponorogo: IAIN Po Press.
Rasyid, Sulaiman, (1994), Fiqih Islam, Bandung : Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Ruzbi, Zulkifli, (2017), Ekonomi Syariah (Pekan Baru: Pusat Pendidikan FAI UIR.
Rozalinda, (2017), Ekonomi Islam, Teori dan Aplikasinya Pada Aktivitas Ekonomi Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada, Cet. 4.
Saputri, Eka, Ely, Siti Elita, & Anisatul Kamilah, (2024). Analisis Perkembangan Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia Dengan Melaksanakan Spin Off Pada Unit Usaha Syariah (Jurnal Inovasi Ekonomi Syariah dan Akuntansi (JIESA) Volume 1 No. 4 (Juli).
Suadi, Amran (2018), Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah; Penemuan dan Kaidah Hukum, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Syaodih, Nana, (2012), Metode Penelitian PendidikanPendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Syafi’i, Rahcmat, (2001), Fiqih Muamalah, Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Sabiq, Sayyid, (2006), Fiqih Sunnah: Jilid 4, Jakarta: Pena Pundi Aksara.
Sapto Nugroho, Sigit, (2020), Metodologi Riset Hukum, Surakarta: Oase Pustaka.
Sudarsono, (2007), Kamus Hukum, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta.
Suadi, Amran, (2017), Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Teori & Praktik, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Syafii Antonio, Muhammad, (2001), Bank Syari’ah: Dari Teori ke Praktek Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Sugiyono, (2015), Metodologi Penelitian Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sunggono, Bambang, (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tambunan, Rudi M, (2013). Pedoman Penyusunan Standard Operating Prosedur, Bekasi: Maiesta Publishing.
Ulya Adila, Hafidah dkk, (2024) Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Berdasarkan Peraturan Undang-Undang, Jurnal Falah: Jurnaal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. 6 Nomor 1, h. 26-35
Pertaminawati, Hendra, (2019), Bentuk Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah dan Penyelesaiaanya. Dirasat: Jurnal Studi Islam & Peradaban. Vol. 14, no. 02, 2019, hlm. 64.
Widiyono, Try, (2023). Aspek Hukum, Akad-Akad Pembiayaan Syariah (Dasar Hukum, Teknik Pembuatan Akta dan Contoh Dalam Praktik Perbankan), Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Widiyono, Try, (2023). Perbankan Syariah: Aspek Hukum Operasional Transaksi dan Produk di Indonesia , Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Raihan, Try Widiyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. In line with the license, authors are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
