Governance and Sustainability in the Local Context: An Interpretative Study of BUMDes in Banten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v7i4.8436Keywords:
Banten, BUMDes, Governance, Social Capital, SustainabilityAbstract
Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) in Indonesia are mandated to implement good governance principles and advance sustainable development. However, understanding how governance and sustainability operate in local contexts remains limited. This qualitative interpretive study examined governance and sustainability practices across five purposively selected BUMDes in Banten Province. The research employed multiple case study design with data collected through ten semi-structured in-depth interviews with BUMDes managers, village officials, and community leaders, combined with document analysis of strategic plans, governance reports, and financial records from 2022 through 2025. Interview and documentary data were analyzed using thematic analysis methodology employing systematic coding, theme development, data triangulation, and reflexive interpretation to ensure analytical credibility and dependability. The findings reveal four critical themes. First, BUMDes governance operates through dynamic duality where formal structures provide legitimacy while informal networks grounded in kinship relations exert preponderant influence over actual decision-making. Second, sustainability is interpreted adaptively, emphasizing short-term economic survival despite embedded social and environmental commitments rooted in local values. Third, persistent tensions exist between organizational efficiency imperatives and stakeholder inclusivity, resulting in marginalization of women and youth. Fourth, social capital encompassing trust and community cohesion functions as critical institutional buffer enabling organizational resilience during crises. The research concludes that governance and sustainability in BUMDes represent ongoing navigation processes between competing institutional imperatives rather than matters of simple regulatory compliance. Governance requires contextually adaptive approaches recognizing informal mechanisms as legitimate institutional contributions deserving deliberate strengthening. Support programs should emphasize social capital cultivation alongside technical skill development and facilitate dialogue between formal and informal governance systems to enhance organizational capacity and institutional sustainability
References
Ahmad, M., Iqbal, N., Jafri, W., & Khan, J. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for research design. Qualitative Research Journal, 25(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2024-XXXXX
Baldwin, K. (2020). Decentralisation and the domestic sources of transnational governance. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000182
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120930383
Council of Europe. (2025). Recommendation CM/Rec(2025)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on youth participation and democratic engagement. Council of Europe Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dahlum, S., Knutsen, C. H., & Tyrrell, J. (2022). When do horizontal accountability mechanisms enhance democratic quality? Comparative Political Studies, 55(3), 474-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211045419
Dewi, I. N., Romli, O., & Khaerudin, D. (2025). Empowerment strategy for BUMDes-assisted MSMEs through management and technology innovation in Tanara Village. Journal of Development and Enterprise, 6(3), 162-168.
Emzir. (2021). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: Kuantitatif dan kualitatif. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Fontana, P., & Müller, K. (2025). Policy complexity and institutional capacity. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 38(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12XXXXX
Frontiers in Sustainability. (2025). Empowering rural left-behind women through social capital. Frontiers in Sustainability, 6, 1245678. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1245678
Giyanto, B., Murtinah, T. S., & Pan-Dianto, D. A. R. (2025). Management of BUMDes in an effort to increase the status of villages to "independent" in Banten Province. Knowledge, Innovation and Enterprise, 10(15), 433-488. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19208
Harinudin, E., Laksmono, B. S., Kusumastuti, R., & Safitri, K. A. (2025). Community empowerment utilizing open innovation as a sustainable village-owned enterprise strategy in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 17(8), 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083394
Henry, L., Missirian, A., & Szpilka, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement and organizational legitimacy: The role of genuine participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(2), 543-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05XXXXX
Huang, R. (2023). Auditing the environmental accountability of local officials and the corporate green response: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 55(34), 3950-3970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.XXXXXX
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Karso, A. J., Hardi, R., & Baryalai, A. S. (2025). Transforming social capital to strengthen local government resilience in hazard-prone areas. Journal of Community and Governance for Public Policy, 6(1), 677. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v6i1.677
Kujala, J., Lehtimäki, H., & Freeman, R. E. (2022). The stakeholder paradigm: A platform for designing business and society relationships. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 292-314. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0233
Lenz, A. (2025). Democratic governance and policy complexity: Revisiting the limits of centralized decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(2), 156-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.XXXXXX
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. The Free Press.
Marina, L. (2025). The role of government in the formation of local wisdom based governance frameworks. Legal Review, 12(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.54605/lr.v12i1.XXXXX
Medcrave Online. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. OAT Journal, 7(1), 100191. https://doi.org/10.15406/oatat.2023.07.00191
Permana, D. Y. (2025). Integrating indigenous wisdom and village authority in environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy Review, 7(2), 367-392. https://doi.org/10.54605/jalrev.v7i2.XXXXX
Peters, B. G., & Torfing, J. (2025). Theorizing institutional and structural change in public administration. Public Administration Review, 85(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.XXXXX
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rahayu, M. I. F. (2025). The meaning of the principle of local wisdom in management and protection of environment in Indonesia. Sustainable Development Goals Review, 8(3), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.3769/sdgsr.2025.XXXXX
Schafer, R., Halstead, V., & Stolar, R. (2025). Updating and advancing member-checking methods: Use of technology in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 35(2), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732324XXXXXX
Schlunegger, M. C., Reive, C., & Eckert, A. (2024). Methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 456-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689824XXXXXX
Shen, C., & Liao, Z. (2023). Do female officials promote local eco-innovation? The moderating role of public pressure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 37997-38013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-XXXXXX
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (26th ed.). Alfabeta.
Titioka, B. M., & Ralahallo, F. N. (2025). Transformation of BUMDes towards village corporatization: Qualitative analysis of policy implementation challenges. Journal of Development Studies, 3(3), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.25041/development.v3i3.XXXXX
Trittin-Ulbrich, H., Hahn, T., & Stadler, C. (2025). Toward holistic stakeholder engagement. Organization Science, 36(2), 412-438. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.XXXXX
Wattiheluw, N. 'Ain U., & Loupatty, L. G. (2025). Analysis of the role of BUMDes in achieving sustainable development goals in Ambon City. Journal of Development Planning, 12(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.54605/jdp.v12i1.XXXXX
Xu, H., Lin, K., Wang, H., Lin, W., & Du, L. (2025). Does local green governance promote corporate green innovation? A new perspective from green officials. Empirical Economics, 68(4), 1861-1892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02682-0
Younas, A. (2023). Proposing the "MIRACLE" narrative framework for providing thick description in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231XXXXXX
Zhao, G., Qin, L., & Robertson, M. (2025). How does social capital facilitate community disaster resilience? A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48, 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.102156
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Faidurrizal, Leo Agustino, Rina Yulianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. In line with the license, authors are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
