Strategy to Accelerate the Utilization of Tatanggo Terminal as a New Economic Growth Lever in Buru Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i1.9117Keywords:
Tatanggo Terminal, transportation infrastructure, development strategy, SWOT, IFAS, EFAS, local economyAbstract
Tatanggo Terminal in Buru Regency was built as a transportation hub and new economic growth center, but until 2025 it did not function as planned. This study aims to: (1) identify the factors causing the terminal's non-functioning, (2) analyze the potential of Tatanggo Terminal in supporting local economic growth, and (3) formulate strategies to accelerate terminal utilization. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis. Data analysis was carried out using the Miles & Huberman model, followed by strategic analysis of SWOT, IFAS, EFAS, and the IE Matrix.
The research results show that there are five main factors that cause Tatanggo Terminal to not function: (1) non-comprehensive planning, (2) weak institutions and enforcement of regulations, (3) lack of transportation route connectivity, (4) community socio-economic preferences for the Old Market, and (5) local political intervention. Nevertheless, the terminal has great potential as a distribution center for agriculture, horticulture, fisheries, and MSMEs along with the growth of public consumption, the increase in the number of vehicles, and the saturation of the Old Market's space capacity. The results of the SWOT.IFAS.EFAS analysis place Tatanggo Terminal in the "turnaround strategy" quadrant, indicating the need for internal strengthening to capture large external opportunities. Recommended acceleration strategies include (1) the formation of a Terminal UPT, (2) route arrangement, (3) facility revitalization, (4) economic cluster development, (5) increasing community participation, and (6) policy consistency between leadership periods
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Buru. (2024). Kabupaten Buru dalam angka 2024. BPS Kabupaten Buru.
Christaller, W. (1933). Central places in Southern Germany. Prentice Hall. (Reprinted 1966).
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nasution, H., & Harahap, A. (2019). Peran terminal dalam mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi kawasan: Studi kasus di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Transportasi dan Logistik, 5(2), 85–96.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Perroux, F. (1955). Note on the concept of growth poles. Economie Appliquée, 8, 307–320.
Rosdiana, R., & Kartikasari, D. (2021). Revitalisasi terminal angkutan umum dan peran kelembagaan dalam optimalisasi infrastruktur transportasi. Jurnal Kebijakan Transportasi, 9(1), 45–58.
Yuliani, T., & Firmansyah, A. (2020). Optimalisasi terminal tipe B dan dampaknya terhadap UMKM lokal di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah, 11(2), 101–115.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jamaludin Samak, Maryam Sangadji, Puji Rahayu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. In line with the license, authors are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.







