Driving Performance Through Motivation: How Productive Behavior Mediates Employee Performance in a Government Revenue Institution

English

Authors

  • Lalu Rahmat Iqbal Universitas Mataram
  • Abdul Azis Bagis Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i2.9804

Keywords:

Motivation, Productive Behavior, Employee Performance, Mediation Analysis, Public Sector

Abstract

The present research investigation examines the effect of work motivation on employee performance, both in a direct manner and through an indirect mechanism through productive behavior functioning as a mediator. A quantitative explanatory research design utilizing survey-based data was implemented from 91 employees of a government institution in Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia. Data were gathered using structured questionnaires and subsequently analyzed employing IBM SPSS Statistics 23, employing validity and reliability assessments, classical regression assumption examinations, multiple linear regression, determination coefficient analysis, F-statistics, t-statistics, and the Sobel test. The findings demonstrate that work motivation exerts a significant effect on productive behavior and employee performance, and that productive behavior, in turn, shows a positive and statistically significant impact on employee performance. The Sobel test confirms that productive behavior partially acted as an intermediary in the relationship linking work motivation and employee performance. These results emphasize the importance of enhancing employee motivation and productivity in enhancing performance outcomes, offering practical contributions to human resource management within public-domain organizations.

References

Affainie, E. A. B., & Qutieshat, A. (2023). Maximising productivity through employee motivation. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i10/OCT23002

Agustian, K., Pohan, A., Zen, A., Wiwin, W., & Malik, A. J. (2023). Human resource management strategies in achieving competitive advantage in business administration. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.53

Arfian, Harding, D., Kadiyono, A. L., & Jatnika, R. (2015). Job Satisfaction Dan Productive Behavior: Pelaku Industri Kecil (Ik). Prosiding SEMNAS Penguatan Individu di Era Revolusi Informasi, 3.

Arikunto, S. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian dan Penilaian Program. Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitive, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gagné, M., & Hewett, R. (2025). Assumptions about human motivation have consequences for practice. Journal of Management Studies, 62(5), 2098–2124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13092

Grant, A. M., & Shandell, M. S. (2022). Social motivation at work: The organizational psychology of effort for, against, and with others. Annual review of psychology, 73(1), 301–326.

Handoko, T. H. (2011). Manajemen. BPFE UGM.

Hong, L., & Zainal, S. R. M. (2022). The Mediating Role of Organizational Culture (OC) on the Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) and Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) to Employee Performance (EP) in Education Sector of Malaysia. Global business & management research, 14.

Hwang, K. (2023). Formal and Informal Accountabilities and Accountability Management: Impact on Work Performance. Administration & Society, 55(5), 953–981. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231165261

Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2008). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Rubenstein, A. L., & Barnes, T. S. (2024). The role of attitudes in work behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 221–250.

Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of applied psychology, 102(3), 338. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000133

Kerlinger, F. N. (2006). Foundations of Behavioral Research (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Layek, D., & Koodamara, N. K. (2024). Motivation, work experience, and teacher performance: A comparative study. Acta Psychologica, 245, 104217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104217

Leso, B. H., Cortimiglia, M. N., Ghezzi, A., & Minatogawa, V. (2024). Exploring digital transformation capability via a blended perspective of dynamic capabilities and digital maturity: a pattern matching approach. Review of Managerial Science, 18(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00692-3

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach (12th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Mangkunegara, A. P. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mangkuprawira, T. S. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik. Ghalia Indonesia.

Maslow, A. H. (2016). A Theory of Human Motivation. Midwest Journal Press.

Moeheriono. (2014). Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nusraningrum, D., Rahmawati, A., Wider, W., Jiang, L., & Udang, L. N. (2024). Enhancing employee performance through motivation: the mediating roles of green work environments and engagement in Jakarta’s logistics sector. Frontiers in sociology, 9, 1392229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1392229

Qalati, S. A., Zafar, Z., Fan, M., Limón, M. L. S., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2022). Employee performance under transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: A mediated model. Heliyon, 8(11).

Rachman, E. (2024). The Impact of Human Resource Development and Organizational Culture on The Quality of Public Service. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 4(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v4i1.135

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (17th ed). Pearson Higher Education.

Sari, R. P., & Nugroho, S. H. (2023). Effect of work stress, extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on job satisfaction and employee performance. Rekayasa, 16(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21107/rekayasa.v16i2.19697

Sedarmayanti. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. PT. Refika Aditama.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suhariadi, F. (2005). Diskripsi Adversity Quotient dan Perilaku Produktif dari Pemogok Kerja. INSAN Media Psikologi, 7(1), 45–69.

Susanto, P. C., Supardi, S., Suhendra, A., Soeprapto, A., & Saepudin, T. H. (2024). Productivity Employee: Analysis of Employee Behavior, Competence, Task Performance, and Work Motivation. Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management (DIJDBM), 5(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/dijdbm.

Tam, N. Van, Watanabe, T., & Hai, N. L. (2022). The importance of autonomous motivation for improving construction labor productivity in Vietnam: a self-determination theory perspective. Buildings, 12(6), 763. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060763

Umar, H. (2008). Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Van Tam, N. (2025). Impact of self-efficacy on construction labor productivity: the mediating role of work motivation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(5), 3407–3431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2023-1114

Zainal, V. R. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan: Dari Teori ke Praktik. Rajawali Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-09

How to Cite

Iqbal, L. R., & Bagis, A. A. (2026). Driving Performance Through Motivation: How Productive Behavior Mediates Employee Performance in a Government Revenue Institution: English. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i2.9804

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.