A SURVEY OF STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND THEIR ENGLISH LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT IN SMA NEGERI 1 PALOPO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v3i2.146Keywords:
Language learning strategies, English Achievement.Abstract
The objectives of this research were: (1) To investigate the dominant language learning strategies (LLSs) used by the students in SMA Negeri 1 Palopo; (2) To investigate the dominant LLSs used by the high and low achiever students in SMA Negeri 1 Palopo; and (3) To investigate the correlation between the students’ dominant LLSs and their English achievement.
This research involved 63 students that were chosen using cluster random sampling technique. The data that was obtained through SILL questionnaire and English achievement test were analyzed using descriptive statistics through SPSS software version 21.0.
The findings revealed that the students use all of the six categories of LLSs given by Oxford (1990), and the most dominant used LLSs category by the students are metacognitive strategies (39.76%), followed by affective strategies (16.95%), while the least dominant used strategies by the students are social strategies (7.60%), followed by memory strategies (8.77%). The high achiever students dominantly use cognitive strategies (40%), followed by metacognitive strategies (30%), while the low achiever students dominantly use metacognitive strategies (42.22%), followed by affective strategies (16.67%). The Chi-square analysis reveals that accumulatively, there is no statistical correlation between the dominant categories of LLSs that the students use with their English achievement.
References
Abbas, A. 2013. An Investigation of Students’ Language Learning Strategies in Mastering Speaking Skill at English and Literature Department of UIN Alauddin Makassar. Unpublished Thesis. Makassar: PPs. UNM.
Aminah, St. 2013. A Study of Motivation and Attitudes and Their Correlation With English Learning Achievement of the First Year Students of SMA Negeri 2 Pangkajene. Unpublished Thesis: Makassar. PPs. UNM.
Arikunto Suharsini. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Brown, H. D. 1994. Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall Regents.
Chen, M. & Hung, L. 2012. Personality Type, Perceptual Style Preferences, and Strategies for Learning English as a Foreign Language. Social Behavior and Personality, (online), Vol. 40 No. 9 (www.sbp-journal.com/index.php/sbp/article/view/2573, accessed on February 15th 2014)
Cook, V. 1991. Second Language Learning and Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
Dörnyei,Zoltán. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers
Dulay, H., Burt, M. & Khrasen, S. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fazeli, S. H. 2012. The Relationship between the Extraversion Trait and Use of the English Language Learning Strategies. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, (online) Vol. 5 No. 4 (http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/srticle/viewFile/30439, accessed on February 15th 2014)
Fazeli, S. H. 2012. The Role of Personality Traits in the Choice and Use of the Compensation Category of English Language Learning Strategies. Indian Jou.rnal of Science and Technology, (online), Vol. 5 No. 6 (http://www.indjst.org Indian J.Sci.Technol., accessed on February 15th 2014)
Fazeli, S. H. 2012. The Influence of Personality Traits on the use of Memory English Language Learning Strategies. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, (online) Vol. 5 No. 7 (http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/srticle/viewFile/30509, accessed on February 15th 2014).
Gage, N. L. & Berliner, D. C. 1992. Educational Psychology. 5th Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Harrison, A. 1983. A Language Testing Handbook. London: Macmillan Publishers.
Krashen, S. D. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning (Internet Edition: 2002). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Jhaish, M. A. 2010. The Relationship among Learning Styles, Language Learning Strategies, and the Academic Achievement among the English Majors at Al-Aqsa University. Unpublished Thesis.. Gaza, Palestine: The Islamic University of Gaza. (online accessed on 10 February 2014)
Krashen, S. D. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition (Internet Edition: 2009). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Little, D. 2001. Learning English as a Second Language: Acquisition and Instruction (Online), www.ncca.ie/uploadedfiles/Curriculum/inclusion/ESL_primary.pdf., accessed on 28th of February 2014)?
Nurlailah. 2012. Effective Learning Strategies Applied by the English Learners in Al Markaz for Khudi Enlightening Studies (MAKES). Unpublished Thesis. Makassar: PPs. UNM.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. 1990. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.
Piaget, J. 2005. The Psichology of Intelligence. Internet E-book Edition. London: Taylor & Francis E-Library.
Purwanto, M. N. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Ramirez, A.G. 1986. Language Learning Strategies used by Adolescents Studying French iin New York Schools. Foreign Language Annuals, Vol. 19. No. 2 (131-141).
Rowe, C. & Fry, J. Memory Strategies (Online), (http://faculty.mercer.edu/spears_a/studentpages/memory_strategies/html3.htm, accessed on on 06 March 2014).
Rubin, J. 1975. What the “Good Language Learner” Can Teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, (41-51).
Said, Y. R. 2013. Learning Strategies Used by the Students of English Department of Tarbiyah Faculty at STAIN Palopo. Unpublished Thesis. Makassar: PPs. UNM.
Sardiman, A. M. 2012. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Saville, M. & Troike. 2006. Introducing Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Setiyadi, A. B. 2006. Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Shabankareh N. N .T. & Hadizadeh A. 2011. A Comparison of Language Learning Strategies (LLSs) between Bilingual and Monolingual Learners, Female and Male Learners, High School and University Students, and High-Level and Low-Level Learners Learning English as a Foreign Language in Iran. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4(8):1–22 (CD-ROM).
Skehan, P. 1989. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold
Soeprapto F.A., Darwis, M. 2006. Linked to the World 2 - English for Senior High School Grade XI. Jakarta: Yudhistira.
Sujarweni, V. W. 2014. SPSS untuk penelitian. First Edition. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Sukmadinata, N.S. 2007. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Fourth Edition. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Leo, S., Groth, C., Kendra, I. L., Lilyana, S., Lukman, E. A., Yugianingrum. 2013. English for Academic Purposes: Essay Writing. Second Edition. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
VanPatten,B. &Benati, A. G. 2010.Key Terms in Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Weda, S. 2007. English Learning Strategies. Makassar: Lembaga Pusat Pengembangan Masyarakat Marginal (LPPMM).
Winkel, W. S. 1983. Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
