Learners’ Perceptions for Teacher’s Feedback of Their Oral Performances: Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.1934Keywords:
Learner perception, Feedback, Performance-task, MotivationAbstract
The feedbacks given by teacher is the important role in monitoring learners during the learning process. Teacher serves feedbacks in various ways, can be correction, praise, suggestion, and so on. By receiving feedbacks, learners are able to realize their errors and they feel motivated to develop and improve their performance. However, not all learners have the same characteristics in accepting the feedbacks well. Some of learners may feel insecure during or after getting feedbacks. Therefore, this study explores learners’ perceptions for teacher’s feedback of their oral performances, whether they feel motivated or feel the other way. The questionnaires were the main tool to gain the information from the learners, and followed by the interview from some learners to get the further and detail explanation. The result shows that most of learners feel motivated from the teacher’s feedbacks, and they have intention to perform better because they understand their errors. However, there are some other aspects that decrease their motivation by the way teacher delivers the feedbacks.
References
Annie, T. (2011). Exploring students’ perception of and reaction to feedback in school-based assessment. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 7(2), pp. 107-127.
Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to Give Effective Feedback. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. United States: ASCD.
Brooks, C., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. (2019). A Matrix of Feedback for Learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), pp. 14-32.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. UK: Longman.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. NY: Pearson Education Brown.
Cheng, L., & Fox, J. (2017). Assessment in the language classroom. London: Palgrave & Macmillan.
Davoudi, S., Mobarakeh, Eslami, A., Rasekh, & Barati, H. (2014). Teachers’ Feedback and Students’ Motivation in English for General and Specific Purposes Courses in Iran. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), pp. 973-981.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed). England: Pearson Education Limited.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, pp. 81–112.
Jena, A. K., & Chakraborty, P. (2013). Effect of student feedback on the motivation of Indian University teachers. I-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(3). pp. 23-31.
Kubszyn, Tom, & Borich, Gary. (2003). Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice (7th ed). US: John Wiley & Sons.
Lewis, M. (2002). Giving Feedback in Language Classes. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
Muho, A., & Roseni, E. (2012). Using Teacher Feedback to Foster Student Motivation in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. LCPJ Publishing, 5(1). pp. 11-27.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
