Analysis Students' Perception of Using Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in Reading Class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.2225Keywords:
MALL, Reading Class, Students’ PerceptionAbstract
This study aims to determine students' perceptions of the use of MALL in the reading class on their learning development using mobile phones as a distance learning medium, especially in the current conditions faced by students such as the corona virus which is to overcome this to maintain the quality of student education or education. lecturers must take advantage of MALL, it aims to create an innovative and creative learning environment with an integrated learning system based on faith and piety, as well as science and technology. This study uses descriptive qualitative research. This research was carried out in the second semester students of the English Department at the University of Muhammadiyah Makassar. sample is 20 students
The findings of this study indicate that the use of MALL in the learning process in the reading class is quite helpful for them, this can be seen from the scale obtained by students based on the results of the Guttman scale analysis, the results of 66% according to the interpretation table are in the range of 0.51 – 0.99, so it can be concluded It is said that the perception of students who use MALL in the reading class is close to appropriate.
References
Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1998). From reader to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Ally, M. (2008). Foundation for educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Second Edition (pp. 1-120). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.
Alshumaimeri, Y. A., & Almasri, M. M. (2012). The effects of using WebQuests on reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 295-306.
Baliu, M. I., & Machmud, K. (2017). The Use of Smartphone in Developing Students’ Reading Comprehension from Perspective of Gender Differences. English Language Teaching and Research, 1(1).
Bayani, M., Leiton, K., & Loaiza, M. (2017). Internet of things (IoT) advantages on e-learning in the smart cities. International Journal of Development Research, 7(12), 17747-17753.
Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (Eds.). (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge University Press.
Darmawati, D. (2018). Improving Speaking Skill Through Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL). Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi, 1(1), 24-30.
Davie, N., & Hilber, T. (2015). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Student Attitudes to Using Smartphones to Learn English Vocabulary. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
Dr.Yusrizal, M.Pd. (2015) Tanya Jawab Seputar Pengukuruan, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Syiah Kuala Uneversity Press
Erlidawati, E. (2016). Quantum Learning in Learning Reading Comprehension. ITQAN: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kependidikan, 7(1), 37-50
Eskey, D. E., & Grabe, W. (1988). 15 Interactive Models for Second Language Reading: Perspectives on Instruction. Interactive approaches to second language reading, 223.
Gay, L.R. 2012. Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications.United Status of America: Person Education.
Hafidz, M. (2018). Basic academic writing (Vol. 9). Duta Media Publishing.
Kim, H., Lee, M., & Kim, M. (2014). Effects of mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: The case of South Korea. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 31-42.
Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause quarterly, 29(4), 22-30.
Kukulskaâ€Hulme, A. (2012). Mobileâ€Assisted language learning. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1-9.
Mambua, Y. (2020). The Effectiveness of Skimming and Scanning Techniques in Improving Student’s Reading Comprehension of Grade Eleven Students of SMA Negeri 1 Tana Toraja: Journal of Sosial Science, 1(3), 93-99.
Mihaylova, M., Gorin, S., Reber, T., & Rothen, N. (2020). A Meta-Analysis on Mobile Assisted Language Learning Applications Reveals Moderate Learning Benefit and Significant Publication Bias.
Moats, L. C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of" balanced" reading instruction. DIANE Publishing.
Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), hal.1-7.
Mustika, Y. (2020). Improving Reading Comprehension on Recount Text By Using Authentic Material: ELTR Journal, 4(2), 140-151.
Nayef, N., Patel, Y., Busta, M., Chowdhury, P. N., Karatzas, D., Khlif, W., ... & Ogier, J. M. (2019, September). ICDAR2019 robust reading challenge on multi-lingual scene text detection and recognition—RRC-MLT-2019. In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) (pp. 1582-1587). IEEE.
Nuraeni, C., Carolina, I., Supriyatna, A., Widiati, W., & Bahri, S. (2020, November). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL): Students’ Perception and Problems towards Mobile Learning in English Language. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1641, No. 1, p. 012027). IOP Publishing.
Rachmitasari, A. (2020). Analisis Efektivitas Pembelajaranmelalui Whatsapp Group Sebagaimediabelajarsiswa (Survei padasiswakelasXI IPStahunangkatan 2019–2020di SMA PGRI Cicalengkapada matapelajaranekonomi) (Doctoral dissertation, FKIP UNPAS).
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief. Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension.
Sharples, M., & Domingue, J. (2016, September). The blockchain and kudos: A distributed system for educational record, reputation and reward. In European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 490-496). Springer, Cham.
Shi, Z., Luo, G., & He, L. (2017). Mobile-assisted language learning using WeChat instant messaging. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(02), 16-26.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading research quarterly, 32-71.
Taylor, J. (2000). New millennium distance education. Dalam V. Reddy & S. Manjulika (Eds). The world of open and distance learning. New Delhi:Viva. Diunduh dari
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Routledge.
Wena, I. M. (2020). Perkuliahan Online dengan Aplikasi Zoom dalam Program Belajar dari Rumah Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19. Prosiding Webinar Nasional Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar 2020, 203-209.
www.usq.edu.au/users/taylorj/publications_ presentations/2000IGNOU.doc
Yudhiantara, R., & Nasir, I. A. (2017). Toward Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL): Reaping Mobile Phone Benefits in Classroom Activities: Register Journal, 10(1), 12-28.
Zhang,L. (2018).Metacognitive and Cognitive Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension. Singapore: Springer Nature SingaporePtc Ltd.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
