Students' Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing: Indonesian Context

Authors

  • Nuur Insan Tangkelangi Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo, Indonesia
  • Suardi Suardi Akademi Teknik Industri Dewantara, Indonesia
  • Rahmawati Upa' Unversitas Cokroaminoto Palopo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.2293

Keywords:

academic achievement, gender, plagiarism, students' understanding

Abstract

Extensive studies identify plagiarism as a grave problem in Indonesian university students’ academic writing (Adiningrum, 2015; Sulaiman, 2015; Zalnur, 2012).Plagiarism is the most severe problem found in students’ theses in the context investigated in this study (Tangkelangi & Widyasari, 2015).However, no study explicitly examines the extent that students understand plagiarism, including both its concept and its practices in the focused context. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by investigating students’ understanding of plagiarism. Considering the results of previous studies related to the potential factors involved in students’ understanding of plagiarism, this study also aims to determine whether gender and academic achievement are considerable factors in students’ plagiarism understanding in the focused context. To investigate these issues, survey research using an adapted questionnaire was conducted to gather data from seventy participants out of a total population of eighty-five students, who voluntarily participated in this study. The participants were third-year students majoring in English Education who will take a unit discussing plagiarism issues in the next semester. The data gathered from the participants was analysed using the Rasch model to determine the students’ understanding of plagiarism. Then, a t-test of two independent samples was used to examine whether the students’ understanding differed between gender and a Pearson’s rtest was used to examine whether academic achievement correlated with their plagiarism understanding. The results of the analyses revealed that the students had a basic understanding of plagiarism and their understanding did not differ between gender or with academic achievement. These findings imply that several plagiarism principles need to be explored more, including unattributed paraphrasing, self-plagiarism and citations and referencing. It is also implied that special treatment for a particular gender or a certain academic achiever is not necessary.

References

Adiningrum, T. S. (2015). Reviewing plagiarism: An input for Indonesian higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 107-120. doi:10.1007/s10805-015-9226-6.

Adiningrum, T. S., & Kutieleh, S. (2011). How different are we? Understanding and managing plagiarism between East and West. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 5(2), 88-98.

Adiningrum, T. S., Wihardini, D., & Warganegara, D. L. (2013). Awareness or understanding? A case study of assessing Indonesian academic staff understanding of plagiarism. Education and Society, 31(1), 69-81. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7459/es/31.1.06.

Agustina, R., & Raharjo, P. (2017). Exploring plagiarism into perspectives of Indonesian academics and students. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(3), 262-272.

Amiri, F., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2016). On Iranian EFL undergraduate students' perceptions of plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(2), 115-131. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9245-3.

Akbar. (2018). Defining plagiarism: A literature review. Ethical Lingua, 5(1), 31-38.

Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12 ed.). Belmont: Cengage Learning.

Bahri, S., & Trisnawati, I. K. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris UIN Ar-Raniry tentang plagiarisme tugas kuliah. Jurnal Imiah DIDAKTIKA, 18(2), 205-224.

Bradinova, M. (2006). Exploring students' and university teachers' perceptions of plagiarism: Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Bretag, T. (2016). Defining academic integrity: International perspectives. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity. Adelaide: Springer.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4 ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Chien, S.-C. (2017). Taiwanese college students’ perceptions of plagiarism: Cultural and educational considerations. Ethics & Behavior, 27(2), 118-139. doi:10.1080/10508422.2015.1136219.

Dawson, M. M., & Overfield, J. A. (2006). Plagiarism: Do students know what it is? Bioscience Education, 8(1), 1-15. doi:10.3108/beej.8.1.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10 ed.). New York: Pearson.

Gullifer, J. M., & Tyson, G. A. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students' understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202-1218. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.777412.

Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. U. (2015). Student perceptions of self-Plagiarism: A multi-university exploratory study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 91-105.

Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2016). Plagiarism in English academic writing: A comparison of Chinese university teachers' and students' understandings and stances. System, 56, 107-118.

Jereb, E., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., & Å prajc, P. (2018). Gender differences and the awareness of plagiarism in higher education. Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 409-426. doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9421-y.

MOEC. (2010). Ratification and prevention of plagiarism in higher education Jakarta.

Nimasari, E. P., & Gestanti, R. A. (2017). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap plagiat. Premiere Educandum, 7(2), 115-123.

Orim, S. M. (2014). An investigation of plagiarism by nigerian students in higher education. (10078007 Ph.D.), Coventry University (United Kingdom), Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30619652.pdf?repositoryId=169.

Prihantini, F. N., & Indudewi, D. (2016). The students’ awareness and behaviors on plagiarism: A study on students of Accounting Department under Faculty of Economy Semarang University). Journal of Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 18(1), 68-75.

Putro, F. W. (2016). Hubungan antara kecemasan akademik dengan plagiarisme pada mahasiswa. (Undergradute), Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, Surakarta.

Satria, R., Tarmizi, & Melvina. (2017). Identifikasi bentuk tindak plagiat pada penulisan skripsi mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Fisika Unsyiah. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 231-237.

Sulaiman, R. (2015). The plagiarism in the theses of English Education students at Kabupaten Bone. Ethical Lingua, 2(1), 102-117.

Tangkelangi, N. I. (2016). Designing a syllabus for an academic writing course based on students’ needs. (Master), Indonesia University of Education, Bandung.

Tangkelangi, N. I., & Widyasari. (2015). Undergraduate students’ problems in writing a research paper: An analysis of the causes. Paper presented at the The Second International Language and Language Teaching Conference, Yogyakarta.

Vanson, S. (2014, 22nd August 2018). What on earth are ontology and epistemology? Retrieved from https://theperformancesolution.com/earth-ontology-epistemology/.

Vincent-Robinson, C. (2016). Faculty perceptions of self-plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty among university students. (10255608 Ed.D.), Florida International University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=3624&context=etd.

Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41-59. doi:10.1080/03075070902912994.

Yang, W. (2014). A quantitative study of ESL/EFL students' understanding of plagiarism. (1555491 M.A.), Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://knowledge.library.iup.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2120&context=etd.

Zalnur, M. (2012). Students’ plagiarism in completing assignments at Faculty of Education IAIN Imam Bonjol Padang. Journal of Al-Ta’lim, 1(1), 55-66.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-20

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)