Which Book Do You Use, “Bahasa Inggris” by Kemendikbud or “Pathway to English” by Erlangga? A Content Analysis

Authors

  • Agustina Septua Sapta Sihotang Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Indonesia
  • Sondang Manik Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Indonesia
  • Arsen Nahum Pasaribu Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.2320

Keywords:

Content analysis, Cunningsworth Theory, Content Quality, Textbook, Tenth Grade

Abstract

This research was conducted to find out the quality of  two textbooks, “Bahasa Inggris†by Kemendikbud and “Pathway to English†by Erlangga for tenth grade based on the theory of Cunningsworth. The approach applied in this study was qualitative descriptive approach. In collecting and analyzing the data, the researcher used 7 out of 8 categories that consist of 40 checklist criteria to find out the result of this research. The data source was entered into checklist table to compare the materials in both books. The researcher then reported the table's results in terms of the aims and objectives, design and organization, linguistic content, skills, topic, methodology, and practical considerations. The writer found that both are good  books and suitable for teachers and learners in Indonesia. “Bahasa Inggris†has met 80% fulfillment percentage of the checklist criteria and “Pathway to English†has met 87% fulfillment percentage. Both have weaknesses as well as strengths. This research can be beneficial for teachers to gain information about the quality and suitability of a textbook for learners and teachers so that teachers can decide which book is going to be used in the class. It is also beneficial to writers to improve the book,  to publishers  to know which book is good to publish and also to understand the definition of an excellent book. And the last, it is also useful to help other researchers to do the next research and to give information on how to do content analysis research.

References

Adams, M. ., & Allan, C. (1977). A Schema Theoritic of Reading. University of Illinois.

Apriyani, L. A., & Robiasih, R. H. (2019). Eight grade text book evaluation by Cunningsworth’s theory. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v2i2.4865

Ari Sihad Syale, Kamaluddin, K., & Siam, S. (2018). CONTENT ANALYSIS ON THE ENGLISH TEXTBOOK ENTITLED. Journal of Teaching of English, 4, 226–239.

Arifah, K. F., Santosa, R., & Ngadiso, N. (2018). Content Analysis of Competences and Scientific Approach in English Textbook. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 219. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.367

B, A., Akib, E., & Amin, B. (2021). Promoting The Students Speaking Skill By Implementing Collaborative Learning Method In Teaching Speaking Skill. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i1.1966

Blooms, B. (1956). TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES The C.lassiiication of Educational Goals HANDBOOK 1 COGNITIVE DOMAIN.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing-your-coursebook. Mcmillan Publishers Limited.

Dilla, R. G., Damayanti, I.-, & Hati, G. M. (2017). the Content Analysis of Bahasa Inggris Textbook for Senior High School Grade X Published By Kemendikbud 2014. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.1.1.1-8

Graves, K. (2000). Designing-Language-Courses-a-Guide-for-Teachers.pdf. Heinley Thomson Learning.

Harmanto, B. (2012). Teaching English to Generation Z students ( New concept of young learners ) A . Young Learners as Generation Z. Fjsnf.

Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2012). Evaluative Criteria of an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(6), 1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1128-1134

Reilly, P. (2006). Understanding and Teaching Generation Y. English Teaching Forum, 50(1), 2–11. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ971235.pdf

Richards, J. C. (2010). Curriculum development in second language teaching. In The Language Teaching Matrix. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667152.003

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks_Sheldon.pdf. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237–246. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc

Syafii, M. (2019). Improving the Quality in Writing Descriptive Texts of Madrasah Aliyah Students Through Directed Writing Activity Strategy. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1027

Tyas, P. A., & Safitri, M. (2019). An Analysis of English Textbook Entitled “Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA SMK/MAK Kelas X.†JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 4(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v4i1.1777

Downloads

Published

2021-12-18

Citation Check