Students’ Perception Of E-Learning In English Language Education, Universitas Internasional Batam

Authors

  • Theodesia Lady Pratiwi Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia
  • Kurniati Kurniati Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2470

Keywords:

E-learning, student perception, face-to-face learning

Abstract

English has been taught in face-to-face class. However, since Covid-19 exploded into a global pandemic and Indonesia confirmed the first case on 2 March 2, 2020, the local government implement a policy to dismiss schools for avoiding a wider spread of the virus in schools. Covid-19 shifted the way students learn from the traditional face-to-face class to long-distance classes or what is called online class. Still, the way online class is something very new for both students and teachers. As a result, the objective of this study is to find the students’ perception of e-learning in English Language Education in Universitas Internasional Batam, this study is conducted. The quantitative method was used by conducting a survey toward 79 students in English Language Education Department. The instrument of data collection were close-ended questions and interview. By concerning the advantage, confidence, effectiveness, and efficiency of utilizing e-learning, the result shows that the average score of the categories is 2.915 which is categorized as positive perception of e-learning.

References

Abou El-Seoud, M., Taj-Eddin, I., Seddiek, N., El-Khouly, M., & Nosseir, A. (2014). E-learning and students' motivation: A research study on the effect of e-learning on higher education. International journal of emerging technologies in learning (iJET), 9(4), 20-26.

Adhabi, E., & Anozie, C. B. (2017). Literature review for the type of interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 86-97.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. and Razavieh, A. (2002) Introduction to Research. 6th Edition, Wadsworth, Belmont.

Banerjee, A., & Chaudhury, S. (2010). Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial psychiatry journal, 19(1), 60.

Bezovski, Z., & Poorani, S. (2016, March). The evolution of e-learning and new trends. In Information and Knowledge Management (Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 50-57). IISTE.

Bob, M., & Ross, L. (2010). Research Methods for Social Science.

Chhabra, P. (2012). Use of E-Learning tools in teaching English. International Journal of Computing & Business Research, 3, 2229-6166.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532-539.

David, S. A. (2013). A critical understanding of learning management system. A Quarterly Refereed Journal of Dialogues on Education, 2(4), 4-12.

Erarslan, A., & Topkaya, E. Z. (2017). EFL Students Attitudes Towards e-Learning And Effect of An Online Course on Students Success in English. The Literacy Trek, 3(2), 80-101.

Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Taylor & Francis.

Haryanto, S. (2018). Kelebihan dan kekurangan E-learning berbasis schoology (studi PTK dalam pembejaran mata kuliah academic listening). Seminar Nasional GEOTIK 2018.

Hyman, M. R., & Sierra, J. J. (2016). Open-versus close-ended survey questions. Business Outlook, 14(2), 1-5.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches.

Loh, C., Wong, D. H., Quazi, A., & Kingshott, R. P. (2016). Re-examining students’ perception of e-learning: an Australian perspective. International Journal of Educational Management.

Maha Rahrouh (2018)Human factor is the most crucial part of LMS

Mukminin, A., Haryanto, E., Sutarno, S., Sari, S. R., Marzulina, L., Hadiyanto, H., & Habibi, A. (2018). Bilingual education policy and Indonesian students’ learning strategies. Elementary Education Online, 17(3).

Mulyani, S. (2020). Students’perception And Motivation Toward English E-Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic (A Study At The Tenth Graders At Sma N 1 Suruh In The Academic Year Of 2019/2020).

Mutambik, I. (2018). The Role of e-Learning in Studying English as a Foreign Language in Saudi Arabia: Students' and Teachers' Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 11(5), 74-83.

Naima, L. (2017). Exploring the status and teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in EFL classrooms at Chadli Bendjedid University, Algeria. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8.

Patil, R. S. (2018). E-learning technologies in english language teaching at tribal area. E-Learning, 3(2).

Qiong, O. U. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18-28.

Quigley, D. (2011). E-Learning as a Strategy to Teach English in Thailand: A Professional Development Model to Support Teacher Growth. Online Submission.

Raharja, S., Prasojo, L. D., & St, A. A. N. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Lms (Learning Management System) Dengan Pengembangan Software Moodle (Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment) Di Sman Kota Yogyakarta Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Reid, L. (2019). Learning management systems: The game changer for traditional teaching and learning at adult and higher education institutions. Global Journal of Human Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 19(6), 1-14.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (Vol. 4). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Rosen, A. (2009). E-learning 2.0: Proven Practices And Emerging Technologies To Achieve . New York, NY: AMACOM.

Saeheng, P. (2017). A Study of e-Learning, Blended learning, and Traditional Teaching Methods to Motivate Autonomous Learning in English Reading Comprehension of Thais Learners. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 2(1), 1-20.

Sangrà , A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145-159.

Shakeri, H. (2012). The relationship among EFL learners’ autonomy, tolerance of ambiguity, reading strategies, and reading comprehension. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for The Degree of Master of Arts In Teaching English As A Foreign Language (TEFL). Islamic Azad University Central-Tehran Branch Faculty of Foreign Languages English Department.

Siahaan, S. (2008). Issues in linguistics. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sinaga, O. (2018). Students' Perception on the Role of English Day Program in Speaking Skill Development. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 4(2), 103-117.

slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Suryati, T., & Suryana, K. (2019). The effect of e-learning based on schoology and student interest to metacognitive thinking skill of vocational high school students in archival subject. International Journal of Research & Review, 6(12), 397-404.

TAYŞI, E., & Başaran, S. (2018). An investigation into university EFL students’ and instructors’ perceptions of using a learning management system. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 100-112.

Thamarana, S. (2018). Facilitator Competencies For Teaching English Language Online Eltai Tirupathi Chapter 6 Th Annual International Conference †Feb , 2018 Facilitator Competencies For Teaching English Language Online.

Vitoria, L., Mislinawati, M., & Nurmasyitah, N. (2018, September). Students’ perceptions on the implementation of e-learning: Helpful or unhelpful?. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012058). IOP Publishing.

Walidin, W., & Idris, S. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory.

Zikmundová, E. (2016). English as a lingua franca: Theory and Practical implications.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-21

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)