EFL Students’ Perceptions and Preferences of The Video Use as a Replacement for Traditional Lecture Method

Authors

  • Anisa Anisa IAIN Palangka Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2656

Keywords:

E-Learning, Perceptions, Preferences, Traditional Lecture Method, Video Use

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate students’ perceptions and preferences of video use as a replacement for traditional lecture during e-learning in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study used two-staged mixed-method. The design of this study was sequential explanatory. This study used 30 closed-ended questionnaires and focus group discussions as the instrument to gain a rich understanding of students’ video experiences, perceptions and preferences. Data were collected from 108 EFL students through an online questionnaire using Google form and face-to-face focus group discussion. Results show that (1) Most of students showed positive perceptions of the use of video as a replacement for traditional lecture during e-learning in times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. It can be seen from the questionnaire results that 83.3% of students showed positive perception. (2) Students mostly preferred video-based learning if there is post-videos watching activities such as reviewing, re-explaining, question and answer, etc. Furthermore, the types of videos they preferred are instructor-created videos and animation videos from YouTube

Author Biography

Anisa Anisa, IAIN Palangka Raya

Department of English Education

References

Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/goingthedistance.pdf

Alpert, F. (2016). Revitalizing the live lecture class with instructor-created videos. 6(4), Innovative Teaching and Differential Instruction to Cater for Student Diversity, Criminology and Criminal Justice Education 6 (4), pp. 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244016680686

Alpert, F., & Hodkinson, C.S. (2018). Video use in lecture classes: current practices, student perceptions, and preferences, Journal of Education + Training, 61 (1), pp. 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2017-0185

Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020. 106424

Carmichael, M., Reid, A. & Karpicke, J.D. (2018). Assessing the impact of educational video on student engagement, critical thinking, and learning: the current state of play, pp. 1-22. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/hevideolearning.pdf

Coman, C., Tiru, L.G., Meses, an-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective, Sustainability, 12(24), pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

Creswell, J.W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (Fifth Edition). Los Angeles: SAGE Publication

Giannakos, M.N., Chorianopoulos, K., & Chirochoides, N. (2015). Making sense of analytics: lesson learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcomes in a video-assisted course. The international review of research in open and distributed learning. 16(1), pp. 260-263. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1061073

Jackman, W. M. (2019). YouTube usage in the university classroom: An argument for its pedagogical benefits. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(9), pp. 157-166. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i09.10475

Khotori, R., & Suzzane, N. (2020) Students’ Perception on the video use by English Teacher as Instructional Media, ELITE: Journal of English, Linguistics, Literature, and Education, 2(2), pp. 127-142.

Kinash, S., Knight, D., & McLean, M. (2015), Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), pp. 129-139. Retrieved from https://pure.bond.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/27948857/Does_digital_scholarship_through_online_lectures_affect_student_learning.pdf

Mann, S. and Robinson, A. (2009), Boredom in the lecture theatre: an investigation into the contributors, moderators, and outcomes of boredom amongst university students, British Educational Research Journal, 35 (2), pp. 243-258. https//doi.org/10.1080/01411920802042911

Martinez. (2001), “Key design considerations for personalized learning on the webâ€, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), pp. 26-40.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaäna, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Miner, S., & Stefaniak, J. E. (2018). Learning via Video in Higher Education: An Exploration of Instructor and Student Perceptions, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(2), pp. 1-14. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1182696

Mullen, R., & Wedwick, L. (2008). Avoiding the digital abyss: Getting started in the classroom with YouTube, digital stories, and blogs. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, 82(2), pp. 66-69.

Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2020) University Students’ Perception of Video-Based Learning in Times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF Perspective, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. pp. 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164

Ulrich, F., Helms, N. H., Frandsen, U. P., & Rafn, A. V. (2019). Learning effectiveness of 360° video: Experiences from a controlled experiment International Journal Of Human–Computer Interaction 17 in healthcare education. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579234

Xing-ju, W., Lin, Z., & Gui-feng, Gao. (2013). Analysis of the Traditional Lecture Method combined with the Seminar Teaching Method in Graduate Education. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaicte.2013.20

Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A. and Schroeder, U. (2014), “Video-based learning: a critical analysis of the research published in 2003–2013 and future visionsâ€, The Sixth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning: eLmL, IARIA, Barcelona, pp. 23-27 March, pp. 112-119.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-06-10

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)