“Well; I think…”, the Dominant Hedges Uttered by Males in Daily Communication: A Sociolinguistic Study

Authors

  • Nadianto Nugroho Rizky Abadi Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5892-7277
  • Lina Purwaning Hartanti Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Setiawan Setiawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2668

Keywords:

hedges, males, non-native English speaker, native English speaker, daily conversation.

Abstract

Hedges are linguistics features that were previously considered by some researchers as the characterization of women's speech to show hesitation and uncertainty of the speech regarding the character of discussion and the sensitivity of the questions. However, this claim was remain debatable by another researcher since the use of hedges cannot be correlated to any specific gender. This study was conducted to reveal the use of hedges can also be employed by males in an informal daily conversation, discussing lights topic and questions that often appear. The conducted study was supported by the transcription from the recorded online meeting with males native and non-native English speakers. The transcribed recorded online meeting was useful to examine the hedges as the participants' expressions in the discussion. The results of the study showed that males also utilized hedges in an informal discussion, and the most frequent one is verbal filler will. The hedges uttered by both males native and non-native were various such as to give them chance to think, to reduce the impact delivered, self-disclosure, and appraise someone's idea. The findings also found that the use of hedges by males in casual daily conversation is normal, in regard to saving the speaker's name toward the interlocutor when discussing a sensitive topic or answering a sensitive question.

Author Biography

Nadianto Nugroho Rizky Abadi, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Students of English Department States University of Surabaya

References

Coates, J. (1987). EPISTEMIC MODALITY AND SPOKEN DISCOURSE. Transactions of the Philological Society, 85(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1987.tb00714.x

Dewaele, J. M. (2017). Why the Dichotomy ‘L1 Versus LX User’ is Better than ‘Native Versus Non-native Speaker. Applied Linguistics, amw055. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw055

Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language and Communication, 10(3), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90002-S

Holmes, J. (2013). Women, Men and Politeness (1st ed.). Routledge.

Jenks, C. J., & Lee, J. W. (2019). Native speaker saviorism: a racialized teaching ideology. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 17(3), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2019.1664904

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/4166707

Levelt, Willem J. M. (1999). "Models of word production". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 3 (6): 223–32. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01319-4. PMID 10354575. S2CID 7939521.

Liddicoat, A. J. (2016). Native and non-native speaker identities in interaction: Trajectories of power. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(4), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-0018

Litosseliti, L. (2010). Research Methods in Linguistics. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Meyerhoff, Miriam (2013). "Routledge Sociolinguistics Glossary". Introducing Sociolinguistics, 2nd edition. Taylor and Francis. Retrieved 2013-05-12.

Miles, Matthew B.; Huberman, A. Michael; Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc

Mohajer, L., & Jan, J. M. (2015). Preserving Face and the Use of Hedges in Masculine World of Men. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208(Icllic 2014), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.176

Nur Kholisoh, N., & Setiawan, S. (2018). Multifunction of Hedges Used by English Department Students: Gender Role Perspective. 222(SoSHEC), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-18.2018.46

Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I Think That Perhaps You Should: A Study of Hedges in Written Scientific Discourse. T. Miller (Ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom

Shi, H., Harrison, J., & Henry, D. (2017). Non-native English speakers’ experiences with academic course access in a U.S. university setting. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 28, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.06.004

Thornbury, Scott; Slade, Diana (2006). Conversation: From Description to Pedagogy. ISBN 978-0521814263.

Voswinkel, Stephan (2011), Helm, Sabrina; Liehr-Gobbers, Kerstin; Storck, Christopher (eds.), "Reputation: A Sociological View", Reputation Management, Management for Professionals, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 31–45, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19266-1_5, ISBN 978-3-642-19266-1

Vlasyan, G. R. (2019). Linguistic Hedging In Interpersonal Communication. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 617–623. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.08.02.72

Wray, et al. (1998). Projects in Linguistics: A Practical Guide to Researching Language (Third). Edward Arnold.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-27

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)