Applying REAP (Read, Encode, Annotate, Ponder) Learning Method to Improve the Students’ Reading Literacy

Authors

  • Lian Brilian Cokroaminoto Palopo University, Indonesia
  • Sri Damayanti Cokroaminoto Palopo University, Indonesia
  • Opik Dwi Indah Cokroaminoto Palopo University, Indonesia
  • Iin Dwi Aristy Putri Cokroaminoto Palopo University, Indonesia
  • Alim Surya Saruman Cokroaminoto Palopo University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2937

Keywords:

REAP Learning Method, Reading Literacy

Abstract

This research is a Classroom Action Research (CAR) conducted at SDN 104 Wiwitan which aims to improve students' reading literacy of class V in Indonesian learning through the REAP learning method. The sample of this research is 30 students in academic year 2021/2022. The instruments used to get the data are observation and test. Data analysis used quantitative and qualitative descriptive statistics. The result of this research showed that the average value of students in the first cycle was 51% with a classical learning percentage of 13%, and in the second cycle the average value obtained by students was 85% with a percentage of 93%. Judging from these data, it can be concluded that there is an enhancement in students' reading literacy in Indonesian learning after they being taught using REAP (Read, Encode, Annotae, Ponder) method, where from cycle I to cycle II it increased by 34%.

References

Abidin, Y. (2016). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Abidin, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arifin. (2011). Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitataif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Arikunto. (2017). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Atmazaki. (2013). Mengungkap Masa Depan: Inovasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dalam Konteks Pengembangan Karakter Cerdas. Makalah. Padang: UNP.

Djamarah, B, S.(2008). Psikologi Belajar Edisi 2. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Hanggi & Herlina, O. (2016). “Tiga Perubahan Kecil dalam Literasi Sekolahâ€. Membumikan Gerakan Literasi di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Ladang Kata

Hanifah, N. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Teori dan Aplikasinya. Bandung: UPI Press.

Harsiati, T. & Priyatni, E. T. (2017). Karakteristik Tes Literasi Membaca pada Programme for International Student Asessment (PISA). BIBLIOTIKA: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan Dan Informasi.

Lulu, L, P. (2020). Pengaruh Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Metode Pembelajaran Jigsaw di kelas IV SDN 251 Sakti Desa Tanarigella Kecamatan Bua Kabupaten Luwu. A Thesis. Palopo: Cokrominoto Palopo University.

Made, Wena (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Malawi, Ibadullah & Maruti, Sri Endang . (2016). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jawa Timur: CV. AE Media Gravika ISBN: 978-60271698-7-6.

Purwanto, Ngalim. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sukardi. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Tindakan Kelas: Implementasi dan Pengembangannya. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Tierney, R. J. & John, E. R. (1990). Reading Strategis and Practies-A Compendium. USA: Allyn and Bacon.

Wulandari & Dessy N. (2013). “Teaching Reading Comprehensions To The Eighth Graders Of SMP Negeri 53 Palembang Through Reading, Encoding, Annotating, Pendering (REAP) Strategiâ€. A Thesis. Palembang: Sriwijaya University.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-30

Citation Check