Developing Digital-Based Speaking Skill Literacy Assessment Using Plomp Model to Support the National Literacy Movement

Authors

  • Maitri Rahmadhani STKIP AL Makusm Langkat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i1.3058

Keywords:

Assessment, Speaking-Literacy, Digital, PLOMP

Abstract

This research aimed to develop a digital-based speaking literacy assessment model that credible, measurable and do able by using the PLOMP model in an effort to support the National Literacy Movement. Located in SMK Al Maksum Stabat, the subject of this research was the second graders of SMK Al Maksum Stabat by applying random sampling. The instrument used were questionnaires both used for the expert validator and for the teachers. The result showed that the digital-based speaking literacy assessment model has 90.88% of validation percentage which means it has a high level of validity but need to be revised. 85.5% respondents respond positively to the developed digital-based speaking literacy assessment model including its interest and its attractiveness. It indicated that the developed digital-based speaking literacy assessment model has fulfill the aspect of feasibility and effectiveness and has been tested successfully implemented at SMK Al Maksum Stabat.

Author Biography

Maitri Rahmadhani, STKIP AL Makusm Langkat

English Department

References

Arifin, Zinal. (2010). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya : Bandung

Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: principles and classroom practice (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Chastain, K. (1998). Developing second language skills (2nd Ed.). Chicago: Harcourt Brace Publishers.

Hahn, at al. (2013). Assessing scientific literacy over the lifespan –A description of the NEPS science framework and the test development. Journal for Educational Research Online, Journal für Bildungsforschung Online. Volume 5 (2013), No. 2, 110–138.

Lina, Y.R., et.al. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Berbasis Literasi Sains tentang Materi Sistem Pencernaan Makanan, Zat Aditif, dan Zat Adiktif untuk SMP. Bioeducation Journal, 2(2), 145-155.

Mahendrayana, Gede. 2014. Developing Project Assessment Instruments for Speaking Skll of the Eight Grade Students of Junior High School. Thesis English Education Study Program, Post Graduate Program, Ganesha University.

Nazara, Situju. (2011). Students’ Perception on EFL Speaking Skill Development. Journal of English Language Teaching, 1 (1): 28-43.

Nitko, Anthony J. (2001). Educational Assessment of Students. Third Edition. United States of America: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Nunan, David. (1991). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2012). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa. PBFE UGM : Yogyakarta

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2008). Penilaian Autentik. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 27 (3): 250-261.

Plomp, T and Nienkee, N. (2013). Educational Design Research. Enscede: University of Twenty.

Purnomo, Edy. (2015). Dasar-Dasar dan Perancangan Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Bandar Lampung. Unila

Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang. (2011). Survei Internasional PISA. Jakarta. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Rahmawati,Yeni. & Ertin. (2014). Developing Assessment For Speaking. IJEE Journal, 1 (2):199-210.

Rahmadhani, Maitri & Supriadi. (2021). The Development Of English Textbook By Using Addie-Model To Improve English Speaking Skill For Non-English Department Students. Anglo Saxon Journal, 12 (1): p. 65-79.

Ratminingsih, N.M. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Induktif Berbasis Lagu Kreasi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20 (1): p. 47-58.

Riduwan. (2011). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Allfabeta.

Robert Petrone. (2013). Linking Contemporary Research on Youth, Literacy, and Popular Culture With Literacy Teacher Education,Journal of Literacy Research 45(3) 240-266

Roth, Eric H, Aberson, Toni W. (2006). Copmpelling Conversations: Questions and Quotations On Timeless Topic. Charleston USA: Chimayo Press.

Rusilowati, A., Lina, K., Nugroho, S. E., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2016a). Scientific Literacy Evaluation Instrument to Measure The Student‟s Scientific Literacy Skill on The Cycle Theme. International Journal of Environment al and Science Education, 11(12), 5718-5727.

Shihabuddin, H. (2009). Evaluasi Pengajaran bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: UPI.

Sudjana, Nana. (2010). Penialain Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung.

Syahari. (2010). Information Gap Task Dapat Meningkatkan Kemampuan Speaking Siswa. Bandung: UNISBA.

Templeton, Melody. (2010). Public Speaking and Presentation Demystified. New York: Mc Graw Hill

Wahyuni, L.G.E. 2(013). Authenticity of Teachers’ Made Assessment and Its Contribution to Students’ English Achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan dan pengajaran Undiksha, 46 (2): p. 182-19

Wortham, Sue C. (2008). Assessment in Early Childhood Education. United States: Pearson Education.

Yuniawan, T. 2014. Model Penilaian Kinerja Dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Berbasis Teks Narasi Bermuatan Pendidikan Karakter Cinta Budaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 14 (01): p. 61-72

Yusuf, A, Muri. (2015). Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta. Prenada.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-08-13

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)