The Correlation between EFL Students’ Metacognitive Reading Strategy and their Reading Comprehension on English Expository Text
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i1.3258Keywords:
Metacognitive reading strategy, expository text, correlational study, students’ reading comprehensionAbstract
The study aimed at revealing the correlation between English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ metacognive reading strategy and their reading comprehension on English expository text. The research applied quantitative method, particularly descriptive and correlational designs. The subjects were the students of Senior High School (SMAS) Buqátun Mubarakah Makassar. The instrument used to collect the data was questionnaire which was adapted from SORS inventory. The data were analyzed by using SPSS Version 22, particularly Pearson Product Moment Correlation Formula. The results of the study showed that the majority of the students in this current time were in possession of high metacognitive reading strategy. Furthermore, the metacognitive reading strategy profile of SMAS Buqátun Mubarakah students was problem solving strategy where the students used some actions and procedures while working directly with the text. Since metacognitive reading strategy included awareness and conscious willing of one or more strategies to monitor reading comprehension, there was tendency of metacognitive reading strategy influenced reading comprehension of the students. Therefore, based on the analysis result of this study, there was significant positive correlation between the EFL students’ metacognitive reading strategy and their reading comprehension on English expository text.
References
Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235-244.
Amani, F. (2017). The Relationship between Students' Metacognitive Strategy and Their Reading Achievement (A Correlational Study at the Fifth Semester Students of Department of English Education in the Academic Year 2017/2018 UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta) UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 2017].
Anderson, N. J. (2004). Metacognitive reading strategy awareness of ESL and EFL learners. The CATESOL Journal, 16(1), 11-27.
Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. M. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 70-77.
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
Coskun, A. (2010). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on the Listening Performance of Beginner Students. Online Submission, 4(1), 35-50.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217-229.
Lau, K. l., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177-190.
Lee, C. K. (2010). An overview of language learning strategies. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 7.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249.
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of developmental education, 25(3), 2-11.
Mónos, K. (2016). A study of the English reading strategies of Hungarian university students with implications for reading instruction in an academic context. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 1(1), 23.
Pammu, A., Mumu, S., Yasin, H., & Asiz, A. (2017). Penelusuran Strategi Metakognitif Mahasiswa dalam Membaca Teks Berbahasa Inggris. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 7(1), 61-69.
Papleontiou-Louca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher development, 7(1), 9-30.
Rastegar, M., Kermani, E. M., & Khabir, M. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive reading strategies use and reading comprehension achievement of EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(2), 65-74.
Roeschl-Heils, A., Schneider, W., & van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in grades 7 and 8. European journal of psychology of education, 18(1), 75-86.
Seker, M. (2016). The use of self-regulation strategies by foreign language learners and its role in language achievement. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 600-618.
Sutiyatno, S., & Sukarno, S. (2019). A Survey Study: The Correlation between Metacognitive Strategies and Reading Achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(4), 438-444.
Takallou, F. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1).
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)