The Combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment in Teaching Speaking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3590Keywords:
British Parliamentary Debate, Peer Assessment, Speaking Ability.Abstract
The main problems of this research were how to improve the speaking ability of EFL students converting grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, discourse, and strategies. therefore, how to encourage them to use English. This research aimed to see whether the combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment may enhance the speaking ability of EFL students. A quasi-experimental method with non-equivalent group design was carried out in this research. The population was the third semester of English Department students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare. Two classes from the population, representing the experimental class and the control class, were selected using the cluster random selection technique as the study's sample. This research used an interview test with a variety of themes as its instrument. Pre-test, treatment, and post-test were the three steps that made up the data collection processes. The data that obtained by the test were then submitted to a quantitative analysis. The research findings demonstrate that the experimental class students' speaking abilities were better to those of the control class. The data from the experimental class showed that the students' mean score was higher compared to the control class (59,68 > 49,06). In conclusion, the combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment was improved the students’ speaking ability.
Â
References
Alasmari, A., & Ahmed, S. S. (2013). Using debate in EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p147
Alzaid, J. M. (2017). The Effect of Peer Assessment on the Evaluation Process of Students. 10(6), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p159
Arung, F., Sembilanbelas, U., Kolaka, N., View, D. S., & Arung, F. (2016). Improving the Students ’ Speaking Skill through Debate Technique. April.
Alfatihah, A., Ismayanti, D., Syam, A., & Santaria, R. (2022). Teaching Speaking Skills through Project-Based Learning for the Eighth Graders of Junior High School. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 152-165. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2555
Asoulin, E. (2016). Language as an instrument of thought. 1(1), 1–23.
Fauzan, U. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability of EFL Students through Debate and Peer Assessment. EFL Journal, 1(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v1i1.8
Hosni, S. Al. (2014). Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners. Ijsell, 2(6), 22–30.
Husnawadi, H., & Syamsudarni, S. (2016). The Role of English Debating Tournament in the Face of the ASEAN Economy Community (AEC). Dinamika Ilmu, 16(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i1.353
Indramawan, A. A. (2013). Improving the Students ’ English Speaking Competence through Storytelling ( Study in Pangeran Diponegoro Islamic College ( STAI ) of Nganjuk , East Java , Indonesia ). International Journal of Language and Literature, 1(2), 18–24.
Latifa, A., Rahman, A., Hamra, A., Jabu, B., & Nur, R. (2015). Developing a practical rating rubric of speakingtest for university students of English in Parepare, Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p166
Leong, L., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2000). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Learners ’ English Speaking Skill. 34–41.
Martinez del Castillo, J. (2015). The Speech Act as an Act of Knowing. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(6), 31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.15
Nazara, S. (2011). Students ’ Perception on EFL Speaking Skill Development. 1(1), 28–43.
Self, I. (2017). Incorporating Self and Peer Assessment in Reflective Teaching Practices. 10(4), 165–184.
Sidabutar, K. (2022). Grice's Types of Maxims in "Willoughbhys" Movie. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 326-337. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2661
Siallagan, M. K., & Sumatera, N. (2017). The Implementation Of ‘ British Parliamentary Debate System ’ In Learning Discussion Text. 3(2), 1707–1723.
Somjai, S., & Jansem, A. (2015). The Use Of Debate Technique To Develop Speaking Ability Of Grade Ten Students At Bodindecha ( Sing Singhaseni ) School. 13(13), 27–31.
Sari, E., & Agustina, M. (2022). Thematic Development in Students’ Argumentative Essay. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 166-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2563
Tighe-mooney, S. (2016). Peer Assessment as a Teaching and Learning Process : The Observations and Reflections of Three Facilitators on a First-Year Undergraduate Critical Skills Module *. 8(2).
Yulia, H. (2017). The Implementation of British Parliamentary Debate Style Training to Improve Second Semes ter Student ’ s Speaking Ability at English Education Study Program of Baturaja University. 1(1), 1–7.
Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2017). Students ’ Perceptions toward Using Classroom Debate to Develop Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Ability. 11(9), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p158
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)