Students’ Argumentative Ability in the Graduate Thesis Introductions

Authors

  • Annisa Annisa Graduate Program, Master of English Language Education, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3624

Keywords:

Argumentative Ability, Swales’ Pattern.

Abstract

The research aimed to explore the students’ argumentative ability in their thesis introduction and to explore the most difficult moves for students in their thesis introduction. Students’ argumentative ability refers to the way students write their thesis introductions by following swales’ pattern (1990). Swales’ Pattern consist of three moves, establishing a research territory, establishing a niche, and occupying the niche.

This research used a Descriptive Quantitative Method. The sample of this research were graduate students thesis from the Graduate Program of English Language Education at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar who completed their studies in 2021. The total sample was sixteen graduate students thesis. The procedure of this research was collected by analysing the students’ thesis introduction by using a rubric.

The results of research found that 1) Students’ argumentative ability in the graduate thesis introductions was good which the students wrote their introduction by claiming the importance of the research (move 1 step 1), reviewing items of previous research (move 1 step 2), indicating a gap (move 2 step 2) and outlining the purposes (move 3 step 1). 2) The most difficult moves for students were move one step two (reviewing items of previous research), and move two step one (indicating a gap). It was identified based on the lowest score got by the students in each move. Therefore, it can be concluded that in writing thesis introductions, the students from Graduate Program of English Language Education at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar who completed their studies in 2021 followed Swales’ Pattern (1990).

 

References

Amielia, S. D., Suciati, & Maridi. (2018). Enhancing Students ’ Argumentation Skills Using an Argument-Driven Inquiry-Based Module, 12(3), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i3.8042

Anita, R. (2012). Students’ Ability in Writing an Introductory Paragraph of Argumentative Essay. Journal Ta'dib, 15(2) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jt.v15i2.225.

Ebadi, S. Et al. (2019). Rhetorical Structure Variations in Abstracts and Introductions of Applied Linguistics Master's Theses by Iraqi and International Students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. 7(1), 101-117. Retrieved from http://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir

Fitriani, D., Kusmayadi, Y., & Oktaviana, F. (2022). Enhancing Students ’ Skill in Writing an Argument through Brainwriting ( A CAR at second grade of Gunung Kaler 2 Junior High School in Tangerang Regency ), 1(2), 112–121.

Kheryadi. (2018). The Student’s Ability and Problems in Writing Introduction of Research Proposal. English Education and Applied Linguistics. 1(1).

Kristiyanti, T. P., Ramli, M., & Ariyanto, J. (2018). Improving the argumentative skills of high school students through teacher’s questioning techniques and argumentative assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013,012012. http://doi.org./10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012012.

Shinta, D. K., & Filia, F. (2020). Improving students’ arguments through collaborative learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics.10(2), 349-358. http://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28602. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/28602

Sudjana, Nana. (2015). Tuntunan Penyusunan Karya Ilmiah. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Whitaker, A. (2009). Academic Writing Guide 2010 A step-by-step Guide to writing Academic Papers. Slovakia: City University of Seattle.

Wuttisrisiriporn, N. (2017). Comparative Rhetorical Organization of ELT Thesis Introductions Composed by Thai and American Students. English Language Teaching. 10(12). doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n12p1. Retrivied from http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p1

Downloads

Published

2023-09-23

Citation Check