The Comparative Study of Visual and Auditory Learning Style on Jigsaw Strategy in Students’ Reading Comprehension at Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i1.3802Keywords:
Learning Styles, Jigsaw Strategy, Reading Comprehension.Abstract
This study aimed to idenify (1) wether there was an effect of using Jigsaw Strategy on Students' reading Comprehension of visual and auditory Learning Style at SMP Negeri 3 Lintonghihuta. (2) whether there was different effect of using Jigsaw Strategy on Students' reading Comprehension of visual and auditory Learning Style at SMP Negeri 3 Lintonghihuta. The design of this study was mixed design quantitative comparation with quasi - experimental research that aimed to determine whether the relationship between the experimental group and comparison group in reading comprehension, the experimental group is the group that received the treatment. One class from the population was taken as samples by using a purposive-sampling technique. There were 32 students were taken as populations from class IX – 1. The class will be taught by Jigsaw strategy to know the reading comprehension achievement then compared between the auditory and visual learning style. The results of this study were (1) there was different post-test score between auditory and visual class where the visual class had higher score (71,25) than the auditory class (67,00) after being taught using jigsaw strategy. The result of the paired sample t-test showed that the values of sig (2-taieled) was 0,000 < 0,050 which means that there was significant different between the Pre-test and Post-test and it can be concluded that there was mean difference between the pre-test and the post-test of reading comprehension score of visual and auditory learning style after taught using jigsaw strategy.(2) Based on the ANCOVA test it was found that the value of level of significance of learning style was 0.120 and the value of level of Jigsaw strategy significance level was 0,162. It can be said that there was no significance effect of jigsaw strategy on students’ reading comprehension of auditory and visual and auditory Learning Style at SMP Negeri 3 Lintonghihuta.
References
Abbas, K.-D. A. (2021). Factors Influencing Students Reading Comprehension Difficulties Amidst The Use Of Modular Distance Learning Approach In Mindanao State University Sulu – Senior High School. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v4i2.78
Adelia, A., & Darmawan, D. (2021). The Use Of Listen Read Discuss (LRD) Strategy To Improve Student’s Reading Comprehension. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(7), 588–592. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v4i7.318
Aronson. (2008). The methodology of Jigsaw procedure in Instructing reading understanding. http://www.nepository.com/
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Ary, D. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed). Wadsworth.
Berlin, A. W., Apriliaswati, R., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2022). Developing E-Module of Islamic Reading Text Materials. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v7i1.13210
Bobbi DePorter. (2000). Quantum Teaching. PT Mizan Publika.
Brown, H. D. (2006). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (Nachdr.). Longman.
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: And Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. A Pearson Education Company.
Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, & Başaran, M. (2013). Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Comprehension. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1922
Efendi, M. A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw in Teaching Reading Comprehension across Different Personality. 1(1).
Fithrotunnisa. (2015). The Comparative Analysis Students Learning Style on Their Achievement in Reading Skill; A Survey Study at the Second Grade of Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs) Muhammadiyah I Ciputat. University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Gholami, S., & Bagheri, M. S. (2013). Relationship between VAK Learning Styles and Problem Solving Styles regarding Gender and Students’ Fields of Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 700–706. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.4.700-706
Hadi, M. S., Izzah, L., & Hidayat, M. N. (2021). The Comparative Study of Students’ Learning Style on Their Achievement in Reading Skill. 9(2), 10.
Hammer, Jeremy. (2001). How to Teach English. Pearson Education Limited.
Husmann, P. R., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2019). Another Nail in the Coffin for Learning Styles? Disparities among Undergraduate Anatomy Students’ Study Strategies, Class Performance, and Reported VARK Learning Styles: Study Strategies, Learning Styles, Anatomy Performance. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777
Kade, A., Degeng, I. N. S., & Ali, M. N. (2019). Effect of Jigsaw Strategy and Learning Style to Conceptual Understanding on Senior High School Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(19), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i19.11592
Kusumamastuti, A., Khoiron, A. M., & Ahmadi, T. A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. CV Budi Utama.
Mahmudah, K. (2017). Using Assesmsnt of Reading Test. Analysis of Reading Comprehension Problems toward the Ninth Graders. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC), 1(1). file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/2436-5191-1-PB.pdf
Marpaung, F. D. N., & Rosmen, R. (2022). Developing Reading E-Module Based on Langkat Sultanate History for English Department Study of STKIP Al-Maksum Langkat. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(10), 4295–4301. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i10.988
Mengduo, Q., & Xiaoling, J. (2010). Jigsaw Strategy as a Cooperative Learning Technique: Focusing on the Language Learners.
Muhammad Adib Efendi. (2021). The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw in Teaching Reading Comprehension across Different Personality. ETJaR, 1(1).
Munir, S., Emzir, E., & Rahmat, A. (2019). The Effect of Teaching Methods and Learning Styles on Students’ English Achievement (An Experimental Study at Junior High School 1 Pasangkayu). JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 2(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v2i2.292
Nurbianta, N., & Dahlia, H. (2018). The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Method in Improving Students Reading Comprehension. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v9i1.2416
Putri Wulung. (2023). The Effect of Visual and Auditory Learning Style on Student’s Reading Comprehension. UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten.
Raynaldo, M. T., & Panjaitan, N. B. (2022). Meta Analysis on The Correlation Between Listen-Read-Discuss (L-R-D) and Reading Comprehension. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(11), 5264–5270. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i11.1257
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Risa Destriani, Riduan, Setiyadi, B., Universitas Lampung, Huzairin, H., & Universitas Lampung. (2021). The comparative study in reading comprehension achievement on students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.23960/UJET.v10.i2.202112
Saadi, I. A. (2012). An examination of the learning styles of Saudi preparatory school students who are high or low in reading achievement. Victoria University Melbourne, Australia, 390.
Zalukhu, A. ., Silitonga, H. ., Manurung, L. W. ., Hia, M. G. ., & Nainggolan, D. C. A. . (2022). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Through (RAP) Read, Ask, And Put Strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(5), 4080–4084. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i5.7180
Safari, M. U. K., & Fitriati, S. W. (2016). Learning Strategies Used by Learners with Different Speaking Performance for Developing Speaking Ability. 15.
Sitohang, I., & Purnawarman, P. (2015). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING A RECOUNT TEXT. 3(2).
Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Susanti, Y. P., & Subekti, A. S. (2020). Jigsaw Strategy for Cooperative Learning in an English Reading Class: Teacher’s and Students’ Beliefs. Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2274
Tawali. (2020). The Effect Of Sqrc (State Question Read Conclude) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Comprehension. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 4(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v4i3.1473
Zalukhu, . . A. ., Hutasoit, D. H., & Napitupulu, F. D. . (2022). The effectiveness of using Personal Vocabulary Notes To improve students’ Reading Comprehension of Eleven Grade at SMA Negeri 13 Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(4), 5949–5955. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i4.6419
Wikandari, Y. D. (2022a). The Influence of Learning Styles Toward Students Reading Achievement at SMP Quran An Nawawy Mojokerto in the Academic Tear of 2020/2021. Journal of Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33059/ellite.v5i02
Wikandari, Y. D. (2022b). THE INFLUENCE OF LEARNING STYLES TOWARD STUDENTS READING ACHIEVEMENT AT SMP QURAN AN NAWAWY MOJOKERTO IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/202. Journal of Education, 5.
Wutthisingchai, S., & Stopps, P. J. (2021). An Analysis of Factors Affecting the English Reading Comprehension of Mattayomsuksa 5 Students in Amphur Mueang, Lampang Province.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
