An Analysis of Writing Task in English Textbook for Seventh Grade of Junior High School Based on Cognitive Domain of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

Authors

  • Adiyanto Edo Nugraha AJR Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
  • Abdul Kodir Al-Baekani Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
  • Putri Kamalia Hakim Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i1.4123

Keywords:

Cognitive Domain, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, Textbook, Writing Task,

Abstract

Cognitive Domains are important in the instructions and questions for learning tasks in the textbook, especially for helping students improve their thinking skills. The aim of this study was to analyze the cognitive process and knowledge dimension of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy represented in the writing tasks provided in the “English for Nusantara†for seventh-grade students. This research was content analysis. This study used a checklist instrument. The research revealed that writing tasks in the textbook covered five of six categories of the cognitive process of revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The most used level of cognitive process was the remembering level. In terms of Knowledge Dimension, all Knowledge Dimensions existed in the writing tasks of the textbook. Writing tasks belong involving factual knowledge were most dominant. In other words, the writing task of the textbook put more emphasis on LOTS rather than HOTS and they were not evenly distributed in every chapter. This indicated that the writing task in the textbook is not appropriate with achievements of junior high school English learning in the Merdeka curriculum. Therefore, the textbook needs to be evaluated to be consistent with the achievements of junior high school English learning in the Merdeka curriculum. Teachers can also modify learning or use other supporting textbooks which are consistent with the Merdeka curriculum.

References

Achmad, W., K., S., & Utami, U. (2023). High-Order Questions Improve Students' Critical Thinking Skills In Elementary Schools. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2).

Anderson, L., W., & Krathwohl, D., R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assesing; A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.

Arlansyah, A., Puspita, H., & Saputra., E. (2023). Reading Questions in" English for Nusantara" Textbook by Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(2), 361-375.

Birmingham, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Using Research Instruments: A Guide for Researchers (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422991

Bloom, Benjamin S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longman.

Chandran., S. (2003). “Where are the ELT Textbook?â€, in Willy A. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology and Materials Design in Language Teaching:Current Perception and Practices and their Implications. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Creswell, J., W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cunningsworth, A. (1998). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Macmillan Publisher.

Damayanti, I., L., Febrianti, Y., Nurlaelawati, I., Suharto, P., P., Fellani, A., J., Rahmadhani, R. (2022). English for Nusantara SMP/MTs Kelas VII (pp. 1-264). Pusat Perbukuan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.

Dzakiah, D. (2020). The Use of Higher Order Thinking Questions in Reading Comprehension to Improve the Students’ Critical Thinking. Qalam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 9(1), 36-42.

Ekalia, Y. J., Selamat, E. H., Jemadi, F., Jelimun, M. O., & Setiawan, A. A. (2022). Implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised in Analyzing the Reading Comprehension Questions. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(1), 59-66.

Gak, D., M. (2011). Textbook-An Important Element in the Teaching Process. Uzbekistan: Fakultas Teknik Nautika.

Gustiwan, F., Rahmawanti, M., R., & Indah, Y., A. (2021, December). Content Analysis Of Mandatory English Textbook Based On Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Cognitive Domain And Its Implication For Material Development. In Bogor English Student and Teacher (BEST) Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 139-147).

Hakim, P., K. (2011). English Standar Kompetensi, Kompetensi Dasar, and Ujian Nasional of SMA in Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Jakarta)

Hedgcock, J., & Ferris, D. (2009). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts,

and contexts. New York: Routledge

Homstad, T., & Thornson, H. (1994). Writing Theory and Practice in the Second Language Classroom: A Selected Annotated Bibliography. German: University of Minnesota.

Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overviewâ€. Theory into Practice. 41 (4), 212-219.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Lestari, R., & Afrinaldi. (2020). An analysis of student difficulties in writing descriptive at eight grade at SMP N 4 Muara Bango. Journal of Language Education Development. 2(2), 261-271.

Miles, M., B., & Huberman, A., M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Masruddin, M., & Kurnia, K. (2018). Improving Students Writing Skill by Using Picture at The Twelfth Year Students of Sma Pesantren Modern Datok Sulaiman Putra Palopo. Ideas: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 3(2). Doi:Https://Doi.Org/10.24256/Ideas.V3i2.152

Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.3024

Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.

Nurfalah, S., M. (2021). Analyzing Higher Order Thinking Skills of Reading Questions in an English Textbook (Doctoral dissertation, State Islamic University).

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1991). Writing: Academic English (2nd ed). New York:Longman.

Putri, C., M., Herawati., A., & Rahmah, M. (2021). Content Analysis of English Textbook for 11th Grade of Senior High School on HOTS Criteria. Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 13(2), 90-93.

Rinjaya, D., & Halimi, S., S. (2022). An Evaluation of Indonesian Textbooks using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra. 16 (1), 1 -18

Riwayatiningsih, R. (2019). Improving Writing Skill with Questioning: A Path on Critical Thinking Skill. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 3(2), 203-213.

Rustiyani, Sofyan., D., & Syafryadin. (2021). “Levels of Cognitive Domain of Tasks in English Textbooks for Senior High School: A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Analysesâ€. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris. 14 (2), 280-293.

Saputra, H., T., & Pujiati, H. (2021). Cognitive Domain of revised Bloom Taxonomy in English Student Book. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Literature Teaching), 6(1), 164-168.

Sari, E., & Agustina, M. (2022). Thematic Development in Students’ Argumentative Essay. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 166-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2563

Suhartono, S., & Kristina, D. (2018, August). Gender bias in textbooks and test items of English language learning in the Indonesian context. In Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018) (pp. 425-428). Atlantis Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-25

Citation Check