Vitality of Tae' Language in Palopo, South Sulawesi

Authors

  • Rusdiansyah Rusdiansyah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0904-2544
  • Eri Kurniawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fidia Ditazam Malik Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4152

Keywords:

extinction, identity, Tae’ language, vitality

Abstract

This study discusses the vitality of the Tae’ language in Palopo city, South Sulawesi. Vitality of Tae’ language can be seen both from its use as a language of daily communication, the number of speakers, documentation, government policies  related  to  the language, and the inclusion of the language in the school curriculum. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method, in  which  interviews  and  observations  were employed. The subjects interviewed were government officials in Palopo city, as well as the people of Palopo. Findings reveal that the vitality of the Tae language in Palopo is vulnerable to extinction. This is characterized by two main indicators: i) very low use of Tae’ language even in the family domain which affects low language transmission as well ;) and the absence of  govermental  policies  in  preserving  and  maintaining  Tae’  language  as  the  identity  of  the Palopo people and the Indonesian. 

References

Alwasilah, AC . (1993). Linguistik Suatu Pengantar . Bandung: Angkasa.

Bernard, HR . (1992). Preserving Language Diversity: Human Organization', in Indigenous Literacies in the Americas: Language Planning from the Bottom-up, ed. by Nancy H. Hornberger. Berlin: Language Preservation and Publishing, pp. 82–89.

Bühmann, D. and Trudell, B. . (2008). Mother Tongue Matters: as a Key to Effective Learning ', Unesco, pp. 1–50.

Crystal, D. (2003). Language Death. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ewing, MC. (2014). Language Endangerment in Indonesia' 'International Journal of Education, Vol. 8 No. 1 December 2014', 8(1).

Fishman, J. (1968). Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton.

Fishman, J. (1972). The Sociology of Language. Massachusett: Newbury House Publication.

Garing, J. (2016). Preposisi dan Konjungsi dalam Bahasa Tae' ', in Bunga Rampai Bahasa dan Sastra . Edisi Bahasa Balai Bahasa Sulawesi Selatan.

Giles H, Bourhis, T. (1977). Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations / [compiled by] Howard Giles. New York: Academic Press.

Grenoble, L. and Whaley, LJ . (2006). Saving Language: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grimes, BF. (2002). Global Language Viability: Causes, Symptoms, and Cures for Endangered Languages. Available at: http://www.sil.org/sociol/ndg-lg-indicators-html. (Accessed: 18 October 2017).

Holmes, K.. (1993). Language Maintenance and Shift in Three New Zealand Speech Community', Applied Linguistics, 14(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.1.1.

Indrayani, LM. (2011). Language Vitality: a Case on Sundanese Language as a Surviving Indigenous Language' , in International Seminar 'Language Maintenance and Shift ' . Semarang: Universitas Dipenogoro.

Krauss, M. (1992). The world's languages in crisis', Language, volume 68(1), pp. 4–10.

Kridalaksana, H.. (2001). Kamus Linguistik . Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Lewis, MP.. (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Tex.: SIL International. Available at: version: http://www. ethnologue.com/. (Accessed: 18 February 2018).

Li, G.. (2002). East is East, West is West'?: Home Literacy, Culture, and Schooling. New York: Peter Lang.

Nancy, H.. (2006). Language Loyalty, Continuity and Change. Toronto: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Nur Hidayah, Asri M. (2017). Frasa Dalam Bahasa Tae’ ( Phrase in Tae’ Language ). Sawerigading 23 (2): 195–204.

Obiero, OJ. (2010). From Assessing Language Endangerment or Vitality to Creating and Evaluating Language Revitalization Programmes', Nordic Journal of African Studies, 19(4), pp. 201–226.

Rahayu, YE and Listiyorini, A.. (2009). Sikap Bahasa Wanita Karir dan Implikasinya pada Pemertahan Bahasa Jawa di Wilayah Yogyakarta . Yogyakarta : Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta .

Rapang, Z.. (2016). Bahasa Tae' Kami yang Hampir Tergerus Zaman' , kompasiana.com , 27 May. Available at: https://www.kompasiana.com/fikhar26/bahasa-tae-kami-yang-hampir-tergerus-zaman_5747ce578623bdf304343c1e.

Richard, JC and Schmidt, RW.. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. 4th edn. London & New York: Routledge.

Rusdiansyah, R., & Retty, I. (2018). Language Attitudes Of Buginese Speakers In Bandung. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 6(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v6i2.514

Rusdiansyah. (2017). Education and Local Language: The Vitality of Tae' Language in School', in Maeda, K., Sandhu, DPS, and Sergey, L. (eds). Kyoto, Japan: Engineering & Technology Research Group, p. 546. doi: https://doi.org/10.15242/DIRPUB.

Setyaningsih, N.. (2010). Pemertahanan Bahasa Jawa Sámin Di Kabupaten Blora' , in Seminar Nasional Pemertahanan Bahasa Nusantara . Semarang: UNDIP Semarang.

Spolsky, B.. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sumarsono and Partana, P.. (2002). Sosiolinguistik . Yogyakarta: Penerbit Sabda.

Sunendar, D.. (2016). Almost 140 Local languages on Brink of Extinction, The Jakarta Post. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/08/02/almost-140-local-languages-on-brink-of-extinction.html (Accessed: 18 October 2017).

UNESCO, ad hoc expert group on endangered languages. (2003). Language vitality and endangerment', (March), pp. 10–12.

Wickstro, B.. (2005). Can Bilingualism Be Dynamically Stable ?', Rationality and Society, Sage Publications, 17(1), pp. 81–115. doi: 10.1177/1043463105051776.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-12

Citation Check