STRATEGI KESANTUNAN TINDAK TUTUR MAHASISWA KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT DALAM DISKUSI ILMIAH

Authors

  • Pujiati Tri Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Gunawan Wawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v6i2.515

Keywords:

Politeness Strategy, Scientific Discussion, and Sociopragmatics

Abstract

This research is aimed to find out the polite utterance strategy of public health study program students, STIKES Kharisma Persada Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan.Theory of Brown and Leveinson (1987) and sosiopragmatics approach were used as analysis tools in finding out the polite utterance strategy of public health study program students.  Quantitave and qualitative method used to analyze the data which were taken from the students’ utterances.  The result of the research shows that (1) The used Politeness strategy : positive politeness strategy 63% and negative politeness strategy 37%. Overall, This research proves that the theory of Brown and Levinson can be used to find out the utterances politeness strategy used of students in discussion forum.

References

Agus, Nuraidar. (2014). “Bentuk Sapaan Bahasa Bugis Dalam Konteks Pragmatik Gender (The Form of Buginese Language Greeting in Gender Pragmatic Context)â€, Sawerigading, Vol. 20, 1 April 2014: 1—13.

Arikunto S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Ed Revisi VI Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Astri Widyaruli Anggraeni “Kesantunan tindak tutur mahasiswa dalam kegiatan presentasi kelas†Didaktika, Vol. 10 No. 3 Desember 2012.

Austin, J.L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Second Edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, P. dan Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Febrina Riska Putri, Ngusman Abdul Manaf, Abdurahman. “Kesantunan berbahasa dalam tindak tutur direktif guru pada pembelajaran bahasa indonesia di SMA Negeri 15 Padang†Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pembelajaran, Volume 2 Nomor 1, Februari 2015.

Holmes, J. (1992). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. England: Longman Group UK Limited.

Hymes, Dell (Ed). (1972). Language in Culture and Socienty. New York: Mac Millan Publishing Co, Inc.

Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Terjemahan oleh M.D.D. Oka. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Markhamah, dkk. (2011) Analisis Kesalahan dan Kesantunan Berbahasa. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press,

Pramujiono, Agung, “Representasi Kesantunan Positif-Negatif Brown Dan Levinson Dalam Wacana Dialog Di Televisi†Artikel ini telah dipresentasikan dalam Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (KIMLI) 2 2011 yang dilaksanakan 9-12 Oktober 2011 di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Bandung.

Puji Lestari dan Harun Joko Prayitno, “Strategi dan Skala Kesantunan Tindak Direktif Mahasiswa Riau di Lingkungan Masyarakat Berlatar Belakang Budaya Jawa†Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, Vol. 17, No. 2, Agustus 2016: 135-148

Tri Rina Budiwati, “Kesantunan berbahasa mahasiswa dalam berinteraksi dengan dosen di Universitas Ahmad Dahlan: analisis pragmatikâ€, The 5th Urecol Proceeding (2017), UAD Yogyakarta

Van Dijk, T. A. 1985. “Introduction: Dialogue as Discourse and Interaction.†dalam Handbook of Discourse Analysis Volume 3 Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press.

Walpole, Ronald E. (1993). Pengantar Statistika. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Wardhaugh, Ronald. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Basil Blackwell Inc.

Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zamzani dkk. “Pengembangan Alat Ukur Kesantunan Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Interaksi Sosial Bersemuka Dan Nonbersemuka. LITER, Volume 10, Nomor 1, April 2011

Downloads

Published

2018-12-29

Citation Check