Critical Discourse Analysis of Islamic Criminal Law Against Drug Crimes Committed by Children (Analysis of Palopo District Court Decision Number: 47/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/PN.PLP)

Authors

  • Ismail Pascasarjana UIN Palopo, Indonesia
  • Muammar Arafat Yusmad Pascasarjana UIN Palopo, Indonesia
  • Takdir Pascasarjana UIN Palopo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7525

Keywords:

Islamic Criminal Law, Drugs Crimes, Children

Abstract

This study examines the application of Islamic criminal law principles in addressing drug-related offenses committed by minors through a critical discourse analysis of Palopo District Court Decision Number 47/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/PN.PLP. The research explores the intersection between Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and Indonesia's contemporary juvenile justice system, particularly focusing on how Islamic legal principles are interpreted and applied in cases involving child offenders in drug-related crimes. The analysis reveals tensions between traditional Islamic criminal law approaches and modern restorative justice principles embodied in Indonesia's Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. While Islamic law emphasizes the concept of ta'zir (discretionary punishment) and consideration of the offender's circumstances, Indonesian juvenile justice prioritizes rehabilitation, diversion mechanisms, and the child's best interests. The study demonstrates how judicial decisions attempt to reconcile these different legal frameworks, often favoring rehabilitative measures over punitive sanctions.  The research employs critical discourse analysis methodology to examine legal language, judicial reasoning, and ideological underpinnings in the court decision. Findings indicate that judges navigate between Islamic legal principles—such as the consideration of mental capacity (ahliyyah) and the protective nature of Sharia toward minors—and secular legal requirements emphasizing restorative justice. The decision reflects Indonesia's pluralistic legal system, where Islamic law influences judicial interpretation while operating within the framework of national criminal law. The study concludes that contemporary Indonesian courts demonstrate flexibility in applying Islamic criminal law principles to juvenile drug cases, prioritizing rehabilitation and child protection over strict punitive measures. This approach aligns with both Islamic jurisprudential concepts of mercy (rahmah) and modern international standards for juvenile justice, suggesting a harmonious integration of religious and secular legal principles in addressing youth criminality.

References

Abduh, N. K., & Masruddin, M. (2023). Structural Studies of Robert Stanton in The Folklore of Luwu (Worongporong dan Pariama). IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(1), 117-126.

Al-Mawardi, A. (2019). Al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah. Translated by Khalil Rahman. Jakarta: Qisthi Press.

Arief, B. N. (2020). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ash-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (2018). Falsafah Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Audah, A. Q. (2018). Criminal Law of Islam. Translated by Zein Hasan. Jakarta: Pustaka Amani.

Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2022). Laporan Tahunan Badan Narkotika Nasional 2022. Jakarta: BNN.

Gultom, M. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dan Perempuan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Hamzah, A. (2020). Kejahatan Narkotika dan Psikotropika. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Huda, C. (2021). Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ibn Taimiyah. (1328H). Majmu' al-Fatawa. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Riyadh al-Hadithah.

Kartono, K. (2021). Patologi Sosial 2: Kenakalan Remaja. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.

Marlina. (2019). Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Mustofa, M. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kriminologi. Jakarta: Fisip UI Press.

Nashriana. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Pidana bagi Anak di Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Polres Palopo. (2021). Data Kriminalitas Anak di Palopo 2017-2021. Palopo: Polres Palopo.

Prakoso, D. (2020). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Palopo Nomor 47/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/PN PLP.

Sambas, N. (2019). Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Anak di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sholehuddin, M. (2018). Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana: Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Siswanto, S. (2019). Politik Hukum dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sudarto. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). World Drug Report 2023. Vienna: United Nations Publication.

Wadong, M. H. (2020). Pengantar Advokasi dan Hukum Perlindungan Anak. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Wahyudi, S. (2018). Implementasi Ide Diversi dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

Citation Check