Person and Social Deixis in Shamsi’s Islamic Preaching to an Atheist
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7588Keywords:
Person deixis, Social deixis, Islamic preaching, Cross-belief debateAbstract
This study examines the use of person and social deixis in Shamsi’s preaching, a Muslim preacher, in Islamic dawah through debate with an atheist at Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park, London. Using Levinson’s (1983) theory of deixis, the research identifies the types and expressions of deictic language used by the preacher when engaging with a non-believer. The data were taken from the DUS Dawah YouTube channel, specifically from a video titled “An Atheist Thinks It's Okay to Sleep with a Baby”. The analysis adopts a descriptive qualitative method. The finding shows that Shamsi uses all types of person deixis. The most dominant is the second person “you”, which appears 118 times, followed by the first person “I” used 21 times, and third person forms such as “he” and “someone”, each used 6 times. In terms of social deixis, Shamsi employs two categories. In the first category, relational social deixis, the most frequently used form is the referent honorific “Prophet” (9 times). This is followed by formality level expressions, such as “the scholar(s)”, which appear 4 times, and audience honorifics like “everyone”, used 1 time. Meanwhile, addressee honorifics do not appear in Shamsi’s preaching, indicating that this form of honorifics was not used in the interaction. In the second category, absolute social deixis, Shamsi refers to himself with the phrase “I'm Muslim” (1 time) as an authorized speaker, and refers to his opponent with the phrase “as an atheist” (1 time) as an authorized recipient. Overall, both person and social deixis used by Shamsi, functioned as powerful linguistic tools to engage intimacy and effectively convey his Islamic message, by defining identity, asserting authority, emphasizing ideological differences to an atheist in public space.
References
Gobel, F., Lihawa, K., & Hasanuddin. (2023). PERSONAL DEIXIS USED IN MALCOLM X’S “THE BALLOT OR THE BULLET” SPEECH. LLT Journal, 26(1), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.4268
Hamid, A., & Uyuni, B. (2023). Human Needs for Dakwah (The Existence of KODI as the Capital’s Da’wah Organization). Jurnal Peradaban Islam, 19(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v19i1.8678
Hati, M., Yunus Laia, M., & Telaumbanua, T. (2021). DEIXIS IN JOHN GREEN’S NOVEL ENTITLED LOOKING FOR ALASKA. Relation Journal, 3(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.57094/relation.v3i2.390
Heriyadi, N., & Diana, E. (2020). AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL DEIXIS IN THE DRESSMAKER MOVIE. Literary Criticism, 7(1), 40–46. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/jlc/article/view/1259
Hidayah, A., & Saraswati, I. (2024). An Analysis of Deixis in Donald Trump’s Speech: “State of the Union Address.” Jurnal Pendidikan, 33(1), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v33i1.4968
Huang, Y. (2014). Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Khalid, F., Nazeer, I., & Ahmad, K. (2022). Person Deixis in English Translation of Summarized Sahih Muslim Hadith in the Book of As-Salat. PSSR, 6(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2022(6-iii)01
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minkhatunnakhriyah, Hidayat, D. N., & Alek. (2021). An Analysis of Deixis on Comment Speech by Indonesian Diplomat in United Nations (PBB) 75th General Assembly Meeting 2020. Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i1.3015
Mohammed Saleh Al-Hamzi, A., Sumarlam, Santosa, R., & Jamal, M. (2023). A pragmatic and discourse study of common deixis used by Yemeni-Arab preachers in Friday Islamic sermons at Yemeni mosques. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2177241
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Nuryusticia, E., & Nurrachman, D. (2021). SOCIAL DEIXIS ANALYSIS ON THE FINAL INTERVIEW WITH THE OBAMAS. Journal of Critical Theory, Art, Language, and Literature, 3(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v3i1.12833
Parker, M. (2018). Speaker’s corner: A comment alongside Essed. ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 18(1), 203-208.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2016). The Thinker’s Guide to the Art of Socratic Questioning (1st ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Purwatiningsih, S. D., & Nursatyo. (2024). Enhancing Faith Through Interfaith Dialogue: Spreading D’awah Messages on YouTube for a Deeper Understanding. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(1), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-109
Ritonga, M. (2023). Person Deixis in Joko Widodo’s Speech: A Pragmatic Analysis. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v3i1.142
Shukri, A. S. M. (2022). Expository Outlines of Islamic Daʿwah: An Overview on Its Objectives, Sources, and Those Called to Islam (Madʿu). AL-ITQAN: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC SCIENCES AND COMPARATIVE STUDIES, 6(1), 5–30. Retrieved from https://journals.iium.edu.my/al-itqan/index.php/al-itqan/article/view/222
Simamora, R. M. P., & Suryani, R. N. (2022). A Pragmatic Study on Deixis Analysis in President Jokowi’s State Speech. E-LinguaTera, 2(2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.31253/lt.v2i2.1734
Sofya, D., & Arifin, A. (2023). DEIXIS USED BY THE CHARACTER IN CURIOUS GEORGE: THE ROYAL MONKEY MOVIE. JELL, 7(1), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v7i1.5466
Susanti, S. I., Lestari, I. W., & Wafa, K. (2023). Analyzing Deixis of English Speech by Kim Namjoon (BTS) at the United Nations. GLENS, 1(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v1i1.2023a4
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Robinda, Fitri Rakhmawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)