Exploring EFL Learners’ and Teachers’ Prespectives in an International Online Exchange Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7905Keywords:
Keywords: Online exchange program, teachers’ perspectives, students’ perspectives, challenges, strategiesAbstract
In today’s interconnected world, fostering intercultural understanding and language acquisition among young learners is increasingly vital. Online exchange programs have emerged as accessible alternatives to traditional exchanges, enabling students to interact globally and build intercultural competencies. This qualitative case study explores the perspectives of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers and students engaged in an intensive international online exchange program organized by With The World Incorporation, Japan. The study aimed to identify challenges faced by participants and the strategies employed to overcome them, offering a holistic understanding of the online exchange experience.
Data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis, involving one teacher, a program coordinator, and actively participating students. Thematic analysis revealed challenges such as technical and connectivity issues, language proficiency barriers, sustaining engagement, scheduling conflicts, and cultural differences. Despite these obstacles, the program proved effective through proactive planning, strong technical and logistical support, psychologically safe and task-based pedagogy, engaging content, and continuous feedback.
These findings align with established theories, including the digital divide, foreign language anxiety, and self-determination theory. The study highlights how adaptive strategies can transform barriers into opportunities to enhance English proficiency, promote intercultural understanding, and develop global competencies. The results provide practical implications for educators and program designers, emphasizing dynamic content, adaptive teaching approaches, and feedback mechanisms to optimize future online exchange initiatives.
References
Ang, S. H., & Earley, P. C. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press.
Belz, J. A. (2007). The development of intercultural communicative competence in telecollaborative partnerships. In R. O'Dowd (Ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers (pp. 127–166). Multilingual Matters.
Belz, W., & Möller, A. (2013). Online exchange and intercultural learning: A research synthesis. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 3-23. https://exchanges.uiowa.edu/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Addison-Wesley.
Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (2018). International student exchange programs: Benefits and challenges for participants. Journal of International Students, 8(4), 1-be17. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/8024
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Multilingual Matters.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
David, F. R. (2011). Manajemen strategis: Konsep (Edisi ke-13). Salemba Empat.
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization at institutions of higher education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Emir, G., & Yangın-Ekşi, G. (2024). The role of telecollaboration in English language teacher education: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00290-0
Escobar Urmeneta, C. (2024). Focusing on interaction in the L2-medium classroom: A classroom observation checklist leading to teacher professional self-development. CLIL Journal, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clil.2024.01.001
Gorski, P. C. (2020). The digital equity divide: Academic research, policy, and practice. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 386-397.
Hauck, M., & Youngs, B. L. (2008). Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220801943510
Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10125/44424
Helm, F. (2018a). Emerging identities in virtual exchange. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.25.9782490057191
Helm, F. (2018b). The long and winding road…. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.3
Helm, F. (2024). Intercultural communication in virtual exchange. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/interculturalcommunication-in-virtual-exchange/4E5C6BE1D80935FFA7573AB43CD75458
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132.
Husnah, L. A., Heriyawati, D. F., & Elfiyanto, S. (2023). Quizizz paper mode is new:Students' perception of using e-tools for language assessment in EFL class. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 10(2), 121-137.
Jung, I. (2009). Towards a theoretical framework of intercultural communicative competence development in an online environment. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 19
Kern, R. (2015). Language, literacy, and technology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113956770
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Sage Publications.
Lee, L. (2013). Online collaborative exchanges for the development of intercultural communicative competence: An analysis of students’ perspectives. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 1-20.
Leong, S. Y., & Said, H. (2024). Development and refinement of the interview protocol: Interview questions for international school teacher retention. International Journal of Evaluation & Research in Education, 13(5), 3017–3027. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i5.11023
Lewis, T., & O'Dowd, R. (Eds.). (2016). Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge.
Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. Wiley-Blackwell.
Liu, W., Lin, W., & Shie, J. (2017). Enhancing intercultural communicative competence through online foreign language exchange: Taiwanese students' experiences. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters
Morgan, D. L. (2019). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 271-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093
Mistar, J. 2005. Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) in Indonesia. In G. Braine (Ed.), Teaching English to the World: History, Curriculum, and Practice (pp. 71-80). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Mistar, J., & Umamah, A. (2014). Strategies of learning speaking skills by Indonesian learners of English and their contribution to speaking proficiency. TEFLIN Journal, 25(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v25i2/203-216
Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7(4), 177-182.
O'Dowd, R., & Lewis, T. (2016). Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge.
O'Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
Risager, K. (2007). Language and culture pedagogy: From a national to a transnational paradigm. Multilingual Matters.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Salo, S., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2020). Technostressors and technostrains: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102213.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Rand McNally.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection.Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
Ubaidillah, M. F., Elfiyanto, S., Rifiyani, A. J., & Lee, H. Y. (2023). Indonesian EFL teachers' identity construction in a Global Englishes era. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 10(1), 199-235.
Vinagre, M. (2016). Developing teachers’ telecollaborative competences in online experiential learning.System, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.003
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
With The World Co., Ltd. (n.d.). Company. Retrieved March 29, 2025, from https://withtheworld.co/en/company/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sifreni Mira Yusiana, Rizal Wahid Permana, Sonny Elfiyanto, Junaidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
