A Feminist Stylistic and Affective Analysis of Melancholy and Memory in Lang Leav’s Revelation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.8731Keywords:
affect theory, emotional discourse, feminist stylistics, Lang Leav, melancholy, memoryAbstract
This study examines the linguistic construction of melancholy and memory in Lang Leav’s poem “Revelation” from Memories (2015) through an integrated framework of feminist stylistics and affect theory. While contemporary feminist scholarship has increasingly engaged with affect, limited attention has been given to how linguistic form in minimalist poetry structures emotional knowledge. Addressing this gap, the study adopts a qualitative interpretive-analytical approach, combining close stylistic analysis with affective interpretation. Drawing on feminist stylistics (Mills, 1995; Montoro, 2023) and affect theory (Ahmed, 2014; Hemmings, 2024), the analysis focuses on lexical choice, grammatical patterns, and figurative language to examine how emotion operates as a mode of knowing. The findings demonstrate that Leav’s minimalist diction and syntactic restraint construct melancholy not as emotional passivity but as an epistemic process of self-recognition. Memory functions as an affective medium through which feminine subjectivity negotiates identity and emotional continuity. The study conceptualizes this strategy as affective minimalism: a poetic mode in which linguistic economy intensifies emotional cognition rather than diminishing it. This challenges traditional binaries between emotion and reason; positioning affects as a legitimate epistemological resource. Theoretically, the study extends feminist stylistics toward affective epistemology and contributes to contemporary feminist poetics by showing how minimalist poetic language can articulate emotional agency and feminist self-representation in the digital age.
References
Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge. Routledge.
Alonso, A. (2021). Contemporary women poets and the politics of emotional expression. Journal of Feminist Literary Studies, 12(2), 45–62.
Berg, J., & McAlister, S. (2023). Students as victim-survivors: Gender-based violence, time and memory. Gender and Education, 35 (9), 1-20.
Bizzini, S. (2022). Digital intimacy and confessional writing: The rise of online minimalism. Journal of Digital Poetics 4(3), 77–93.
Gutiérrez, M. (2024). Feminist stylistics revisited: Language, resistance, and emotional agency. Language & Gender Review, 18(1), 10–29.
Hemmings, C. (2024). Feminism, Affect, and Cultural Memory. Routledge.
Integrity, R. J. (2024). A Feminist Stylistic Analysis of Selected Poems.
Koivunen, A. (2023). Affect, emotion, and feminist methodology. Feminist Studies, 49(1), 78–95.
Lazar, M. (2019). Feminist critical discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
LeBlanc, E. (2023). Digital Intimacy and Feminine Voice in Contemporary Poetry. . Journal of Modern Poetics, , 12(2), 101–118.
Mills, S. (1995). Feminist Stylistics. Routledge.
Montoro, R. (2023). Feminist Stylistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Papacharissi, Z. (2023). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. . Oxford University Press.
Shorter, A. (2025). Embodied Emotion and Feminist Research: Reclaiming Affect. . Australian Feminist Studies, 40(1), 67–83.
Stevenson, T. (2022). Affective Memory in Feminist Poetics: The Case of Lang Leav. Feminist Theory Review, 18(2), 234-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2031817X.2022.2042489
Taylor, F., & Francis, T. (2025). Feminist Theories and Emotions in Literature.
UIR, J. (2024). Stylistic Analysis of Gendered Language in Modern Poetry.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Intan Maulina, Saiful Anwar Matondang, M Manugeren, Zayed Hussein Saleh Al-Mudhafar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
