Teacher’s Directive Speech Acts to Special Needs Students in EFL Class Interaction at Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.9029Keywords:
Classroom Interaction, Directive Speech Acts, Special Needs Students.Abstract
This study investigates the types and strategies of teachers’ directive speech acts and the responses of special needs students during English learning and classroom interaction at the junior high school level. Using a qualitative approach, the data were obtained naturally from classroom communication to capture authentic linguistic behaviour. The findings reveal four types of directive speech acts used by teachers, namely commands, prohibitions, suggestions, and imperatives, each serving distinct instructional and behavioural purposes. The analysis also shows that teachers employ both direct and indirect strategies in delivering directives, which are adapted to students’ cognitive, emotional, and linguistic conditions. Furthermore, the responses of special needs students vary according to the nature of the directive, the clarity of the instruction, and the contextual demands of the classroom situation. Some students respond promptly and appropriately, while others require repetition, modelling, or simplified instructions to process and perform the requested actions. Overall, the realization of the directive types, strategies, and student responses is shaped by the diverse interactional contexts in special needs classrooms, demonstrating that effective teacher directives must be flexible and sensitive to students’ individual characteristics. These findings highlight the importance of pragmatic awareness in instructional communication, particularly in supporting the engagement and participation of students with special needs in EFL learning.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anjarsari, A. D., Efendy, M., & Sulthoni. (2018). Penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusi pada jenjang SD, SMP, dan SMA di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi), 1(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.26740/inklusi.v1n2.p91-104
Baihaqi, A., & Sugiarman, S. (2006). Memahami ADHD pada anak: Gangguan konsentrasi, hiperaktivitas, dan impulsivitas. Bandung, Indonesia: Pustaka Cendekia.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Bouck, E. C. (2006). Secondary students with mild disabilities: The role of graphing calculators. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(1), 17–25.
Cendaniarum, W. B., & Supriyanto. (2020). Pengelolaan layanan keterampilan vokasional siswa tunarungu. Jurnal Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(3), 167–177.
Charlina, C., Sinaga, M., Septiyanti, E., & Kurniaman, O. (2018). Teacher speech act in learning process at special school in Pekanbaru. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7120–7123. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12422
Christianto, D. (2020). Speech acts in EFL classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1836/jopr.v2i1.1-68-79
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Cutting, J. (n.d.). Pragmatics and discourse. London, England: Routledge.
Suryandani, P., & Budasi, G. I. (2021). An analysis of directive speech acts produced by teachers in EFL classrooms. Journal of English Language and Culture, 12(1), 36–45. Retrieved from http://journal.ubm.ac.id/
Dayana, I. P. (2019). Perkembangan bahasa anak down syndrome. Journal of Special Education Lectura, 1(1), 24–28.
Smith, D. (2014). Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: A scoping study. Unpublished undergraduate thesis.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
Donald, D., Lazarus, S., & Lolwana, P. (2001). Educational psychology in social context: Challenges of development, social issues, and special need in Southern Africa (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Enyi, A. U. (2016). Rhetorical diplomacy: A study of Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari’s speech to the 70th session of the United Nations General Assembly. International Journal of Language & Linguistics, 4(2), 38–52.
Fitria, R. (2012). Proses pembelajaran dalam setting inklusi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Khusus, 1, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.24036/jupe7810.64
Frick, P. J., & Nigg, J. T. (2012). Current issues in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 77–107.
Fuad, M., Efendi, A., & Muhammad, U. A. (2020). The use of Pepaccur local wisdom for Indonesian literary teaching materials. JPI, 9(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.22779
Haryanto, H., & Mubarok, H. (2020). Teacher’s directive expressions analysis in English teaching classes. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 8(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.8.1.2018.22-42
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Latief, M. A. (2013). Research methods on language learning: An introduction. Malang, Indonesia: UM Press.
Khalid, M. (2018). Removing barriers for deaf and hard of hearing students in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.xxxxxx
Makarim, M. H., & Hayati, R. (n.d.). Teacher's directive speech acts in classroom at SMPIT Tahfidzul Qur’an Ulil Albab Karanganyar. Retrieved from https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/kip
Mangunsong, F. (2014). Psikologi dan pendidikan anak berkebutuhan khusus. Depok, Indonesia: LPSP3 UI.
Millichap, J. G. (2013). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. Nature Reviews Neurology, 9(10), 556–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.192
Nisa, L. K., & Abduh, M. (2022). Directive speech acts analysis in teacher and student interaction during thematic learning in elementary school. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 6(2), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i2.49372
Nugraha, U. (2015). Hubungan persepsi, sikap, dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar pada mahasiswa pendidikan olahraga dan kesehatan Universitas Jambi. Jurnal Cerdas Sifa, 1(1), 37–39.
Putri, R. P., & Putro, B. H. (2021). Learning dance to improve motor skills of lightweight palsy cerebral patients at YPAC Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(03), 493–501.
Rafli, Z. (2018). English speech acts of illocutionary force in class interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v9n3p113
Rizqianti, N. A., Ningsih, P. K., Ediyanto, E., & Sunandar, A. (2022). Implementasi tugas guru pembimbing khusus serta kendala sebagai tenaga pendidik profesional di sekolah inklusi Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Kebutuhan Khusus, 6(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.24036/jpkk.v6i1.609
Rumaria, C. (2015). An analysis of speech acts in The Dead Poets Society. Undergraduate thesis, Yogyakarta State University.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1985). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Shores, R. E., Gunter, P. L., Denny, R. K., & Jack, S. L. (1993). Classroom influences on aggressive and disruptive behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(2), 1–14.
Soewondo, W. (2019). Pendidikan kesehatan gigi untuk penyandang sindrom down. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 55–58.
Susanto, A., Dianasari, E. L., Putri, Z. D., & Kurniawan, E. (2019). The special education needs students and the teaching of English vocabulary. Jurnal Minda, 1(1), 54–60.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Tai, K. W. H. (2024). Classroom interactional competence in an English medium instruction mathematics classroom: A creation of a technology-mediated translanguaging space. Learning and Instruction, 90, 101849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101849
Thuan, P. D. (2021). Attitude and motivation in language learning: A review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(5), 65. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.5.7
Tohidast, S. A., Mansuri, B., Bagheri, R., & Azimi, H. (2020). Provision of speech-language pathology services for the treatment of speech and language disorders in children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Problems, concerns, and solutions. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 138, 110262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110262
Uddinayah, N. D., & Silfia, E. (2019). An analysis of students' motivation in learning English at SMAN 8 Kota Jambi academic year 2018/2019. Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(2), 140.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zuhrotun Nisa Saragih, Maslatif Dwi Purnomo, Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
