Filler Utterances of Instructors in ELT Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i2.999Keywords:
discourse analysis, ELT, filler, instructor, utteranceAbstract
This study investigated filler utterances produced by English instructors teaching a general English course considering that fillers play crucial roles in English language teaching (ELT) contexts. Data, consisting of 981 filler utterances, were collected from recorded teaching sessions conducted by female and male English instructors at the Language Institute of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The collected data, in the form of transcribed texts containing instructors’ filler utterances, were examined with the discourse analysis method. The findings showed that the female instructors produced more types of fillers with the total of 639 utterances and the male ones 342. Fourteen types of phrase fillers uttered by the female instructors were as follows: actually, alright, and then, anyway, I guess, I mean, I think, okay, right, so, well, ya (yes), you know, and you see. Thirteen kinds of phrase fillers identified among the male instructors’ utterances were alright, and now, and then, anyway, I guess, I mean, I think, okay, right, so, well, ya (yes), and you know. The frequently identified fillers shared benefits in terms of introducing topics, getting the students’ attention, giving instructions, searching for words, and emphasizing and confirming ideas.
Â
References
Ambrosio, Y. M., Binalet, C., Ferrer R., & Yang J. (2015). Analysis of language functions in children’s classroom discourse. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2), 105-114.
Baalen, I. V. (2001). Male and female language: Growing together?. Retrieved on September 25, 2018 from http://www.let.leideuhiv.nI/hsl_shl/VanBaalen.htm.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Brennan, S., & Schober. M. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274–296.
Brown, G. &Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. London. Cambridge University Press.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, R. (1993). Introducing applied linguistics: An A-Z guide. Harlow: Penguin English.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corley M., MacGregor L. J., & Donaldson D. (2007). It's the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105(3), 658-668.
Dalton, P., & Hardcastle, W. (1977). Disorders of fluency. London: Edward Arnold.
Du Bois, J. W. (1974). Syntax in mid-sentence. Berkeley studies in syntax and semantics, 1(3), 1-25.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elliot, R., & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A handbook of research methods in clinical and health psychology, pp 147-159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erten, S. (2014). Teaching fillers and students’ filler usage: A study conducted at ESOGU Preparation School. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(3), 67-79.
Filipi, A., & Wales, R. (2003). Differential uses of okay, right, and alright, and their function in signaling perspective shift or maintenance in a map task. Semiotica, 47, 429-455.
Fraundorf, S., & Watson, D. (2011). The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 161–175.
Garcés Conejos, P., & Bou Franch, P. (2002). A pragmatic account of listenership implications from foreign/second language teaching. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 15, 81-102.
Grice, G., & Skinner, J. F. (2006). Mastering public speaking (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gryc, J. (2014). Fillers in academic spoken English. Published bachelor’s thesis. Masaryk University, Czech Republic.
Jay, T. B. (2003). The psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.
Kharismawan, P. Y. (2017). The types and the functions of the fillers used in Barack Obama’s speeches. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 111-119.
McCarthy, M. (2002). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Mukti, N. I., & Wahyudi, R. (2015). EFL students’ uses of um as filers in classroom presentations. Journal of Language and Communication, 2(1), 63-76.
Novarretta, C. (2015). The functions of fillers, filled pauses and co-occurring gestures in Danish dyadic conversations. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Multimodal Communication (pp. 55-61) Dublin.
Pamolango, V. A. (2016). An analysis of the fillers used by Asian students in Busan, South Korea: A comparative study. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 2(3), 96-99.
Pamolango, V. A. (2015). Types and functions of fillers used by the female teacher and lecturer in Surabaya. Parafrase, 15(1), 11-15.
Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 29, 139–150.
Rose, C. S., & Nilsen, K. (2013). Communicating professionally: A how-to-do-it manual (3rd ed.). Chicago: Neal-Schuman.
Rose, R. L. (1998). The communicative value of filled pauses in spontaneous speech. Published master’s thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sanjaya, A. A., & Nugrahani, V. E. (2018). Speech disfluency in groups’ presentations of English education master’s program students. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 21(1), 11-26. Retrieved from http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/895
Santos, N. M. B., & Alarcón, M. M. H. (2016). Fillers and the development of oral strategic competence in foreign language learning. Porta Linguarium, 25, 191-201.
Schachter, S., Christenfeld, N., Ravina, B., & Bilous, F. (1991). Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 362-367.
Schacter, S., Rauscher, F., Christenfeld, N., & Crone, K.T. (1994). The vocabularies of academia. Psychological Science, 5, 37-41.
Starks, H. & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372-1380.
Tottie, G. (2014). Uh and um in British and American English: Are they words? Evidence from co-occurrence with pauses. In N. Dion, A. Lapierre, & R. T. Cacoullos (Eds.), Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory (pp. 38– 54). New York: Routledge.
Wertz, F. J. (1983). From everyday to psychological description: Analyzing the moments of a qualitative data analysis. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 197–241.
Wood, L. A. & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yule, G. (2006). The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
