Earning Persistence Moderates the Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility, Conservative Accounting, and Growth Opportunity on Earnings Response Coefficient

Authors

  • Muhammad Ridho Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia
  • Nofryanti Universitas Pamulang , Indonesia
  • Holiawati Universitas Pamulang , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.10886

Keywords:

earnings response coefficient, corporate social responsibility, accounting conservatism, growth opportunity, Earning Persistence

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Purpose: the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), accounting conservatism, and growth opportunity on the Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC), with earnings persistence as a moderating variable, in IDX80-listed companies over the 2021–2024 period. Methods: This research employs a quantitative approach using secondary data drawn from annual reports published on the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). A purposive sampling technique yielded 42 companies and 168 firm-year observations. Data were analyzed using panel data regression, with model selection determined through the Chow Test, Hausman Test, and Lagrange Multiplier Test, followed by descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, the F-test, the t-test, and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). Results: The results show that CSR and accounting conservatism do not significantly affect ERC, while growth opportunity has a significant effect on ERC; furthermore, earnings persistence moderates the relationship between CSR and ERC as well as between growth opportunity and ERC, but does not moderate the relationship between accounting conservatism and ERC. Implications: These findings imply that investors and analysts evaluating IDX80 firms should weigh growth opportunity and the persistence of reported earnings when interpreting earnings information, rather than relying on CSR disclosure or conservatism alone as signals of earnings quality, while for management and regulators they highlight that the market value of CSR initiatives may depend on the firm’s underlying earnings stability. Future research could extend the observation period, broaden the sample beyond IDX80, incorporate alternative measures of CSR, or test other potential moderating and mediating variables to deepen understanding of the determinants of the earnings response in the Indonesian capital market.

References

Afifah, P. A., Pradipta, A., & Supriatna, D. (2023). Pengaruh Persistensi Laba, Risiko Sistematik, dan Faktor Lainnya terhadap Earnings Response Coefficient. Media Bisnis, 15(1), 121–136.

Akbar, R. N., Kurniawan, M. I., Zh, M. H. R., & Kamilah, A. N. (2025). Menjembatani Kesenjangan: Kerangka Kerja SDG-Wakaf-FinTech Terpadu untuk Transformasi Keuangan Pendidikan di Indonesia. AMAL: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 7(2), 29-36.

Alang, T., Saraswati, E., & Andayani, W. (2023). Determination of Earnings Response Coefficient with Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure as a Moderating Variable. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 27(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v27i3.10656

Almeida, H., & Campello, M. (2020). Financial Constraints, Asset Tangibility, and Corporate Investment. Review of Financial Studies, 33(9), 4114–4151.

Aulia, P. P., Effendi, J., & Safri. (2025). Pengaruh CSR, Konservatisme Akuntansi, dan Risiko Sistematik terhadap ERC (Studi pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di LQ45 Periode 2019--2023). Jurnal Akuntansi.

Basu, S. (2020). The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24(1), 3–37.

Dhyanasaridewi, I. G. A. D., & Murwaningsari, E. (2021). The Effect of Sustainability Report Disclosure and Innovations on Earnings Informativeness with Environmental Performance as a Moderating Variable. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 11(1), 29–37.

Dionosius, L., Hendrily, M., & Kuswanto, R. (2025). Analisis Kinerja Portofolio Saham dengan Metode Sharpe, Treynor, dan Jensen (Studi pada Saham IDX80). Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting (COSTING), 8(4).

Francis, J., & Schipper, K. (2019). Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Governance? Journal of Accounting & Economics, 27(2--3), 53–69.

Gandhi, D. A. D. P., & Wirajaya, I. G. A. (2025). The Effect of Accounting Conservatism, Capital Structure, Liquidity, Profitability, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Earnings Quality. Global Management: International Journal of Management Science and Entrepreneurship, 2(4), 195–210.

Hörisch, J., Johnson, L., & Chang, J. (2020). The Role of Earnings Response Coefficient in Corporate Financial Reporting. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 45(2), 112–130.

Indriyani, A. N., & Rahayu, S. I. (2023). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosures, Accounting Conservatism, and Leverage on Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC). Jurnal Akuntansi.

Istianingsih, Trireksani, T., & Manurung, D. T. H. (2022). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on the Future Earnings Response Coefficient (ASEAN Banking Analysis). Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229671

Kusumawati, E., Wahyuningtyas, A. P., & Sari, S. P. (2022). The Effect of Growth Opportunity, Profitability, CSR, Firm Size, and Leverage on Earning Response Coefficient. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 7(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v7i3.22028

Maksim, S., & Vasilyev, G. (2021). Growth Opportunities and Firm Value: The Role of Managerial Decision-Making. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34(2), 222–245.

Mohammed, R. M. H. (2022). The Effect of the Accounting Conservatism on Reducing Information Asymmetry and the Cost of Capital within the Framework of International Standards. Journal of Global Social Sciences, 3(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.58934/jgss.v3i11.65

Nabila, A. T., & Paramita, V. S. (2024). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Growth Opportunity, and Company Characteristics on Earning Response Coefficient. Jurnal Akuntansi.

Onasis, D., & Jasman. (2025). The Moderating Role of Information Asymmetry on Earnings Persistence and Earnings Response Coefficient. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 17(1).

Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. (2021). Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and the Market’s Reaction to Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 32(2), 105–123.

Pradita, R. I., & Sunarsih, S. (2023). Empirical Study of Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC) in Consumer Goods Sector Companies. Finansha: Journal of Sharia Financial Management, 4(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.15575/fjsfm.v4i1.24650

Sandy, R. M., & Mulya, A. S. (2025). Earnings Response Coefficient: Earnings Persistence Moderated by Capital Structure and Economic Growth. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1).

Savitri, R. (2021). The Role of Earnings Response Coefficient in Determining Market Perception of Earnings Quality. International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 35(1), 45–59.

Sekerci, N., Jaballah, J., Essen, M. V, & Kammerlander, N. (2022). Investors’ Reactions to CSR News in Family versus Nonfamily Firms: A Study on Signal (In)credibility. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(1), 82–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211010498

Sherlita, E., & Ramadhian, M. G. F. (2021). The Influence of Capital Structure, Growth Opportunities and Earnings Persistence on Earnings Response Coefficient. Jurnal Akuntansi.

Sukendra, C. A., & Suhendah, R. (2024). Faktor Determinan Earnings Response Coefficient pada Perusahaan Energy. Jurnal Akuntansi.

Susilawati, S., Abbas, D. S., & Hidayat, I. (2025). Pengaruh Growth Opportunity, Persistensi Laba, dan Prudence Accounting terhadap Earnings Response Coefficient: Risiko Sistematis sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(3), 1791–1808.

Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, A. T. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Management Decision, 60(6), 1211–1233.

Viviani, J.-L., Touchais, L., & Nguyen, L.-P. (2022). CSR Disclosure and Information Asymmetry: The Role of Financial Reporting Quality. Bankers, Markets & Investors, 170(3), 47–58.

Yuliandhari, W. S., & Fadila, E. N. (2024). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Accounting Conservatism, Earnings Persistence, and Systematic Risk on Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC). Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(2), 1000–1017.

Zang, A. Y. (2019). Conservatism in Financial Reporting and the Role of Earnings in Asset Pricing. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(4), 835–869.

Zhang, Y., Imeni, M., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2023). Environmental Dimension of Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Persistence. Sustainability, 15(20).

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Muhammad Ridho, Nofryanti, & Holiawati. (2026). Earning Persistence Moderates the Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility, Conservative Accounting, and Growth Opportunity on Earnings Response Coefficient. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.10886

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.