Confession as a Ground for Case Termination in KPPU from the Perspective of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah (A Study of Decision Number 04/KPPU-I/2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.11852Keywords:
KPPU, Recognition, Termination of Case, Decision Number 04/ICC-I/2024, Ibnu Qayyim al-JauziyahAbstract
This study analyzes the position of confession as a ground for case termination in KPPU Decision Number 04/KPPU-I/2024 and examines it from the perspective of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah. The background of this research is based on the behavioral change mechanism introduced under KPPU Regulation Number 2 of 2023, which allows the reported party to acknowledge the alleged violation and submit commitments for behavioral improvement, as well as concerns that confession may become a shortcut that weakens the deterrence function and the protection of public interests. This study employs normative juridical research using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that confession is not the sole basis for case termination but rather an initial requirement to enter the behavioral change mechanism. The termination of the case in KPPU Decision Number 04/KPPU-I/2024 was carried out after the commitments to behavioral change had been declared fulfilled through a process of supervision and verification in accordance with KPPU Regulation Number 2 of 2023. From the perspective of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah, confession (iqrār) is a highly authoritative form of evidence but cannot stand alone without supporting proof capable of revealing the objective truth. Therefore, the case termination mechanism is fundamentally consistent with the legal thought of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah. However, the effectiveness and legitimacy of case termination ultimately depend on the objectivity and accountability of the verification process regarding the implementation of the behavioral change commitments.
References
Adelia, I., & Zahara, F. (2025). Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Manipulasi Produk Pesanan Perspektif Ibnu Taimiyah ( Studi Kasus Marketplace Shopee ). QANUN : Journal of Islamic and Studies, 4(1), 348–355.
Adha, I., Harahap, R. B. R., & Lubis, F. (2023). Peranan Advokat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(3), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v3i3.2932
Al-Jauziyah, I. Q. (1900). Al-Thuruq al-Hukmiyyah fi al-Siyasah al-Syar’iyyah. Al-Abad wal Muayyad.
Aminah, S. (2022). Kedudukan Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence) Dalam Penyelesaian Praktik Kartel Di Indonesia. DHARMASISYA Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2(3), 1493–1504.
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press.
Batubara, C., Rokan, M. K., Manaf, M. F. B. A., Sukiati, & Harahap, I. (2024). Realizing Justice and Maṣlaḥah in E-Commerce: Fiqh Muamalah Insights and Challenges in Malaysia and Indonesia. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 23(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i2.12356
Braithwaite, J. (2006). Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies. World Development, 34(5), 884–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.021
Chandra, J., & Hoesein, Z. A. (2025). Penerapan Teori Hukum Responsif dalam Pembentukan Regulasi di Indonesia. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(05), 1483–1499. https://journal.cattleyadf.org/index.php/Judge/article/view/1898
Gunardi. (2022). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum (Murni (Ed.); Pertama). Damera Press.
Hamid, A., & Putra, D. (2021). The Existence of New Direction in Islamic Law Reform Based on The Construction of Ibnu Qayyim al-Jauziyah’s Thought. Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 20(2), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.3290
Hanif, M. F., Sudaryat, S., & Suryamah, A. (2025). Implications of Implementing Behavior Changes in Abuse of Dominant Position Based on Business Competition Law. Awang Long Law Review, 7(2), 438–446.
Hidayatullah, O. U., & Damayanti, R. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Dugaan Praktik Monopoli dalam Pemilihan Otomatis Jasa Pengiriman Shopee Express di Marketplace Shopee Berdasarkan Pasal 19 Huruf D dan Pasal 25 Ayat (1) Huruf A UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Book Chapter Hukum Dan Lingkungan, 1, 1395–1412.
Hutapea, K. A. P., Sirait, N. N., & Lubis, T. M. (2025). Efektivitas Penerapan Perubahan Perilaku Oleh Kppu Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Dalam Penentuan Layanan Kurir Di Platform Shopee. Acta Law Journal, 3(2), 63–78.
Jauziyah, I. Q. Al. (2006). Hukum Acara Peradilan Islam (Pertama). Pustaka Pelajar.
Junaidi. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Persaingan Usaha dengan Terciptanya Pengadilan Persaingan Usaha. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 6(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v6i1.40960
Maarif, I. (2024). Optimalisasi Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Melalui Pendekatan Partisipatif dan Kolaboratif. JIL Pers :Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Perspectives, 1(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.70837/qnhv1t11
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Pertama). Mataram University Press.
Murniati, R., Zatika, D. A., Ria, W. R., Wahyu, H., Ramadhan, Prayitno, D. P., Nurlaili, E., & Adiwangsa, B. (2026). Kebaharuan Tata Cara Perubahan Perilaku dalam Penanganan Perkara Pelanggaran Hukum Persaingan Usaha Berdasarkan Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha No. 2 Tahun 2023. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(4), 4773–4791. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i3.7966
Nuriskandar, L. H. (2021). Perbandingan Metode Pembuktian Secara Qarinah Di Terengganu (Malaysia) Dan Aceh (Indonesia). Jurnal Darussalam : Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perbandingan Hukum, 3(2), 150–166. http://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/JIEB/article/view/3845%0Ahttp://dspace.uc.ac.id/handle/123456789/1288
Octavi, E. D., & Tejomurti, K. (2025). Praktik Pemilihan Jasa Pengiriman pada E-Commerce ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), 138–145.
Pasaribu, I., Yuslem, N., & Djamil. (2018). Penerapan Maqâsid Syarî ’ Ah Dalam Fatwa- Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Provinsi Sumatera Utara Tahun 2000-2010. ANALYTICA ISLAMICA, 7(1), 76–97.
Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
Rokan, M. K. (2012). Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia (Kedua). PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Safura, N. R. (2022). Sanksi Administrasi Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Melakukan Kesempatan Perubahan Perilaku Dalam Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha. Jurist-Diction, 5(4), 1535–1564. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i4.37343
Syafinas, S. A., Wiranata, I. G. A. B., Sunaryo, S, S. A., & Rohaini. (2025). Penghentian Pemeriksaan KPPU Atas Shopee Dan Shopee Express: Implikasinya Terhadap Hukum Persaingan Usaha Dan Dinamika Perubahan Sosial. Jurnal Kelitbangan, 7(2), 1–11.
Widhiyanto, F. (2024). Shopee Teken Pakta Integritas dengan KPPU, Bakal Taati Aturan Jasa Layanan Kurir. Investortrust.id. https://investortrust.id/business/32033/shopee-teken-pakta-integritas-dengan-kppu-bakal-taati-aturan-jasa-layanan-kurir,
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Madinah Asri Putri Andarin, Mustapa Khamal Rokan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. In line with the license, authors are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
