Company Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility

Authors

  • Zarkasi Zarkasi Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Sufyati HS Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Darmawati Manda Universitas Bosowa, Indonesia
  • Deddy Novie Citra Arta Politeknik Penerbangan Jayapura, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v5i1.3642

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility Firm Performance, state

Abstract

This study seeks empirical evidence on the impact of independent variables, namely corporate social responsibility and state, as moderating variables on firm performance. The purposive sampling technique was used to analyze a sample of 7 companies in the construction sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2019 and 2022. Panel data regression and descriptive statistics were employed in this study. The study's findings show that corporate social responsibility has a positive but non-significant effect on firm performance, and that the state does not moderate the effect of corporate social responsibility on firm performance.

References

Aggestam, M. (2006). Privatization Ideology And Ownership Change In Poland: An Institutionalist Study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(4).

Al-Shammari, M. A., Banerjee, S. N., & Rasheed, A. A. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility And Firm Performance: A Theory Of Dual Responsibility. Management Decision, 60(6).

Amin-Chaudhry, A. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility-From A Mere Concept To An Expected Business Practice. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1).

Bai, X., & Chang, J. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility And Firm Performance: The Mediating Role Of Marketing Competence And The Moderating Role Of Market Environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2).

Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(1).

Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does It Pay To Be Really Good? Addressing The Shape Of The Relationship Between Social And Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11).

Beuselinck, C., Cao, L., Deloof, M., & Xia, X. (2017). The Value Of Government Ownership During The Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42.

Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007). Positioning Stakeholder Theory within the Debate on Corporate Social Responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1).

Brown, S., Gray, D., McHardy, J., & Taylor, K. (2015). Employee Trust And Workplace Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 116.

Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate Philanthropic Practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5).

Chen, S. J., Chen, M. H., & Wei, H. L. (2017). Financial Performance Of Chinese Airlines: Does State Ownership Matter? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 33.

Cornett, M. M., McNutt, J. J., & Tehranian, H. (2007). Corporate Governance And Earnings Management At Large U.S. Bank Holding Companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(4).

Filbeck, G., Gorman, R., & Zhao, X. (2007). The “Best Corporate Citizensâ€: Are They Good For Their Shareholders? Financial Review, 44(2).

Freeman, R. E. (1774). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4).

Ghozali, I. (2022). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 Edisi 7. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Kurniadi, W., Lotte, L. N. A., Cakranegara, P. A., Sampe, F., & Yusuf, M. (2022). HANAN WEDDING PLANNER'S MARKETING COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR INCREASING SALES IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ERA ON THE TIKTOK APP. Jurnal Ekonomi, 11(03), 1359-1364.

Herawati, A. F., Yusuf, M., Cakranegara, P. A., Sampe, F., & Haryono, A. (2022). Social Media Marketing In The Promotion Of Incubator Business Programs. Jurnal Darma Agung, 30(2), 623-633.

Haider, Z. A., Liu, M., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Government Ownership, Financial Constraint, Corruption, And Corporate Performance: International Evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 53.

Hategan, C. D., Sirghi, N., Curea-Pitorac, R. I., & Hategan, V. P. (2022). Doing Well Or Doing Good: The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility And Profit In Romanian Companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4).

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1776). Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs And Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4).

Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3).

Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1).

Kao, E. H., Yeh, C. C., Wang, L. H., & Fung, H. G. (2022). The Relationship Between CSR And Performance: Evidence In China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 51.

Kuncoro, M. (2007). Metode Riset Untuk Bisnis Dan Ekonomi. Erlangga.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor Protection And Corporate Valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3).

Lee, J., Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. (2022). Doing Good Does Not Preclude Doing Well: Corporate Responsibility And Financial Performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(4).

Lim, M. H., Kang, Y. S., & Kim, Y. (2017). Effects Of Corporate Social Responsibility Actions On South Korean Adolescents’ Perceptions In The Food Industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(2).

Long, W., Li, S., Wu, H., & Song, X. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility And Financial Performance: The Roles Of Government Intervention And Market Competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2).

Ma, S., Naughton, T., & Tian, G. (2010). Ownership And Ownership Concentration: Which Is Important In Determining The Performance Of China’s Listed Firms? Accounting and Finance, 50(4).

Mahrani, M., & Soewarno, N. (2022). The Effect Of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism And Corporate Social Responsibility On Financial Performance With Earnings Management As Mediating Variable. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1).

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory Of The Firm Perspective. In Academy of Management Review (Vol. 26, Issue 1).

Megginson, W. L. (2005). The Economics Of Bank Privatization. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(8-7 SPEC. ISS.).

Michelon, G., Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2019). Examining the Link between Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: An Analysis of the Best Corporate Citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2).

NarkunienÄ—, J., & UlbinaitÄ—, A. (2022). Comparative Analysis Of Company Performance Evaluation Methods. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1).

Peng, C. W., & Yang, M. L. (2014). The Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Financial Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ownership Concentration. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1).

Phung, D. N., & Mishra, A. V. (2016). Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Vietnamese Listed Firms. Australian Economic Papers, 55(1).

Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1777). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology And Analysis. Business and Society, 36(4).

Rahman, A. N. A. A., & Reja, B. A. F. M. (2015). Ownership Structure and Bank Performance.

Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(5).

Rahman, M., Rodríguez-Serrano, M. Ã., & Lambkin, M. (2017). Brand Equity And Firm Performance: The Complementary Role Of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Brand Management, 26(6).

Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1777). A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3).

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1774). Politicians And Firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4). Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1777). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4).

Widarjono, A. (2022). Ekonometrika: Pengantar dan Aplikasinya, Edisi Keempat. Penerbit UPP STIM YKPN

Yusuf, M., & Matiin, N. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF THE MARKETING MIX ON PURCHASING DECISIONS. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 1(3), 177-182.

Yusuf, M., Sutrisno, S., Putri, P. A. N., Asir, M., & Cakranegara, P. A. (2022). Prospek Penggunaan E-Commerce Terhadap Profitabilitas Dan Kemudahan Pelayanan Konsumen: Literature Review. Jurnal Darma Agung, 30(1), 786-801.

Yusuf, M., Saiyed, R., & Sahala, J. (2022, December). Swot Analysis in Making Relationship Marketing Program. In Proceeding of The International Conference on Economics and Business (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 573-588).

Yusuf, M., & Matiin, N. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF THE MARKETING MIX ON PURCHASING DECISIONS. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 1(3), 177-182.

Yusuf, M., Betty, H., & Sihombing, M. (2022). The Effect of Product and Service Quality on Consumer Loyalty at Palopo Minimarkets. December. https://doi.org/10.24042/febi.v7i2.14430

Zeng, F., Hu, Z., Chen, R., & Yang, Z. (2009). Determinants of Online Service Satisfaction and Their Impacts on Behavioral Intentions. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20(9).

Downloads

Published

2023-03-05

How to Cite

Zarkasi, Z., HS, S., Manda, D., & Arta, D. N. C. (2023). Company Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v5i1.3642

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)