Analysis of Financial Ratios in the Drinking Water Company (PAM) Tirta Mangkaluku, Palopo City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/dinamis.v4i2.3420Keywords:
Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, Debt Ratio, Debt Equity Ratio, RentabilitasAbstract
This study aims to determine and analyze financial ratios (liquidity, solvency and profitability ratios) in the Drinking Water Company (PAM) Tirta Mangkaluku) Palopo City. The type of data used in this study is secondary data, where the data relates to the financial reports obtained from the Drinking Water Company (PAM) Tirta Mangkaluku Jalan Pongsimpin, Murante Village, Mungkajang District, Palopo City for the period 2014 – 2016. Based on the results of the study, it was found that Current The ratio cannot increase the added value of PAM Tirta Mangkaluku, Palopo City, but because the Current ratio (CR) is more than 100%. Thus, the company can pay off its current debt when billed. The Quick Ratio (QR) cannot increase the added value of PAM Tirta Mangkaluku Palopo and the results of current assets minus inventory are higher than current liabilities so that the company is able to pay off its current debts when billed. The debt to total asset ratio (DR) can increase the added value of PAM Tirta Mangkaluku, Palopo City, because the total assets are more than the total debt, so the company can pay off its total debt. The Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) can increase the added value of PAM Tirta Mangkaluku, Palopo City, because the total assets are more than the total debt, so the company can pay off its total debt. Economic Profitability (RE) cannot increase the added value of PAM Tirta Mangkaluku, Palopo City. Based on the calculation results of Own Capital Profitability (RMS) for the last 3 years from 2014 to 2016 there has been a fluctuating increase, the result is that Own Capital Profitability can increase added value to PAM Tirta Mangkaluku Palopo City.
References
Baridwan, Zaki, 2004, Intermediate Accounting, Edisi ketiga, Cetakan Ketiga., Yogyakarta : BPFE.
Djarwanto, 2001, Pokok-Pokok Analisa Laporam Keuangan. Edisi Kedua Cetaka, Pertama. Yogyakarta : BPFE
Jumingan. 2014. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Kasmir, 2011, Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta : Kencana
Kusomo,Adi. 2009. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah Mandiri.Jurnal Ekonomi. Jakarta
Mamduh, H. Hanafi, dan Halim, Abdul, 2004, Manajemen Keuangan. Yogyakarta: BPFE
Munawir, S. 2004. Analisis Kritis Atas Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Pustaka Utama
Myer, 2003, Principle of Corparate Finance. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Pustaka Utama
Prastowo, Dwi, 2008. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN.
Riyanto, Bambang, 2001. Dasar-Dasar Pembelajaan Perusahaan, Cetakan Ketujuh, Yogyakrata : BEP.
Wahyu. (2005). Manajemen Kualitas (Pendekatan Sisi Kualitatif). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Abdul Halim. (2007). Akuntansi Sektor Publik Akuntansi keuangan daerah, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta, Salemba Empat.
Hasibuan, Malayu , 2004, Dasar-Dasar Perbankan, jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Lukman Dendawijaya, 2009, Manajemen Perbankan, Edisi Kedua, Jakarta : PT. Ghaila Indonesia.
Ronny Kountur, 2007, Metode Penelitian, Untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis. Edisi Revisi, Jakarta : PPM
Rusyamsi, Imam. 2001. Asset Liability Management: Strategi Pengelolaan Aktiva Pasiva Bank. Edisi ke-II Yogyakarta : Unit penerbit dan percetakan (UUP) AMP YKPN
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung : CV. Alfa Beta.
Taswan 2006, Manajemen Perbankan : Konsep, Teknik Dan Aplikasi, Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN