Pedagogical Competence of English Teachers in Professional Learning Communities: Evidence from ETA Pinrang Regency

Authors

  • Andi Sri Fathul Rahmah Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • La Sunra Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ryan Rayhana Sofyan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i2.10083

Keywords:

Pedagogical Competence, English Teachers, Professional Learning Community, Teacher Development, Indonesia

Abstract

This study investigated the pedagogical competence of English teachers participating in the English Teachers Association (ETA) in Pinrang Regency, Indonesia. Pedagogical competence is a key determinant of instructional quality and student learning outcomes. Using a quantitative descriptive survey design, the study involved 50 English teachers selected through total sampling. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire covering four dimensions: understanding learners, instructional planning, teaching implementation, and learning evaluation. Descriptive statistical analysis showed that respondents demonstrated a high level of perceived pedagogical competence. Across questionnaire items, 82% of responses were categorized as “Agree” and 18% as “Strongly Agree,” indicating consistently positive self-assessments. Understanding learners emerged as the strongest dimension, while learning evaluation received comparatively lower scores, although it remained in the high category. The findings suggest that active participation in ETA may contribute positively to teachers’ professional growth through collaboration, knowledge sharing, peer support, and reflective practice. They also highlight the value of localized professional learning communities in regional contexts where access to large-scale training opportunities may be limited. Because the study relied on self-reported data, future research should incorporate classroom observations, interviews, and mixed-method approaches to gain a more comprehensive understanding of actual pedagogical practices. This study offers practical insights for strengthening teacher development programs and improving the quality of English language teaching.

References

Abduh, N. K., & Masruddin, M. (2023). Structural Studies of Robert Stanton in The Folklore of Luwu (Worongporong dan Pariama). IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(1), 117-126.

British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. Jossey-Bass.

DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Faizah, A., & Sutopo, D. (2021). The implementation of teachers’ pedagogical and professional competence in authentic assessment. English Education Journal, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v11i1.48823

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Kusumawati, E., Suswandari, & Umam, K. (2025). Strengthening teacher competence for leading and sustaining the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2501458

Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.

Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Setiawan, E. I., Masruddin, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2023). Semiotic Analysis and Ethnography Study on the Implementation of Local Wisdom in Economic Field at Luwu Society. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(2), 1912-1925.

SEAMEO. (2010). Teaching competency standards in Southeast Asian countries: Eleven-country audit. Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd ed.). ASCD.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

UNESCO. (2025). Global education monitoring report 2023: Transforming education with technology in Southeast Asia. UNESCO.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004

Downloads

Published

2026-09-05

Citation Check