An Analysis on Students’ Motivation in English Reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1029Keywords:
motivation, English reading, analysisAbstract
The purpose of this research was to know the students’ motivation in English reading. The reason why this research was conducted was to find what the aspect which influences students’ motivation in English reading and the reason behind it. The population of this research was 210 students. The researcher took 136 students as the sample of this research. The sampling technique that researcher used was simple random sampling. Then, 4 students purposively were interviewed by the researcher.  The questionnaire result showed that, because of the high means score in reading curiosity (RC) was 3.30. Then, the mean score for reading involvement (RI) was 3.30. Also, the mean score for importance of reading (IRE) was 3.60, researcher concluded that the students were intrinsically motivated. The interviews result showed that, beside to add knowledge, or learn culture, most of them answered that their motivation was to add new vocabulary. Even though there was still negative attitude like feeling shy or afraid of making mistake, they thought that English reading was beneficial for them like to know other cultures. In order to promote learners’ intrinsic motivation, one of the best ways might be by providing them with interesting material. The lecturer should provide a wide selection of interesting reading materials and let the students choose and read the book in a comfortable situation.
References
References
Chen, Y.H. (2009). Taiwanese College EFL Learners’ Perceptions of English Reading and Their Motivation to Read. Degree of Master of Arts, Ming Chuan University.
Cohen, L. et al (2000). Research Methods in Education. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the Research Agenda. Language Learning, Vol. 41, No. 4, December 1991, p469-512.
Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing Motivation in Foreign-Language Learning. Language Learning. Vol. 40, No. 1, March 1990, p45-78.
Gardner, R.C. (1985). The Attitude/Motivation Test Battery: Technical Report. University of Western Ontario.
Guthrie, J.T. (2001). Contexts for Engagement and Motivation In Reading. International Reading Association: Washington DC. Retrieved 3 February 2014. From http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index. asp? HREF=/articles/handbook/guthrie/index.html.
Iftanti, E. (2012). A Survey of the English Reading Habits of EFL Students in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, Volume 23, Number 2, July 2012.
Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved January 27, 2014, From http://www.all4ed.org/publications/Adolescents AndLiteracy.pdf.
Lapan, S. D. (2004). Foundations for Research Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Leipzig, D. H. (2001). What is Reading? Retrived September 08, 2014. From Reading Rockets: http://www.readingrockets.org/article/352/.
Marczyk, G. et al (2005). Essentials of Research Design and Methodology. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mori, S. (1999). The Role of Motivation in the Amount of Reading. Temple University Japan Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, VOL. 14, November 1999. Retrieved January 27, 2014. From http://www.tuj.ac.jp/tesol/publications/working-papers/vol-14 /mori.html.
Mori, S. (2002). Redefining Motivation to Read in a Foreign Language. Reading in a Foreign Language. Vol. 14, No. 2, October 2002, p91-110.
Muijs, D. (2004). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
Parault, J.S. and Williams, M. H. (2009). Reading Motivation, Reading Amount, and Text Comprehension in Deaf and Hearing Adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance. November 2009, p1-16.
Pretorius, E. (2000). What They Can’t Read Will Hurt Them: reading and academic achievement. Innovation, No 21, December 2000 p35.
Postlethwaite, N. T. (2005). Educational research: some basic concepts and terminology. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Rayner, K. et al (2001). How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. American Psychological Society, VOL. 2, NO. 2, November 2001.
Santos, A. (1999). Cronbach's Alpha: A Tool for Assessing the Reliability of Scales. Extension Journal, Vol. 37, No. 2, April 1999. Retrieved September 08, 2014. From http://www.joe.org/joe/1999april/tt3.php.
Wigfield, A., and Eccles, J. S. (1992). The Development of Achievement Task Values: A Theoretical Analysis. Developmental Review 12, p265-310.
Wigfield, A. and Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of Children’s Motivation for Reading to the Amount and Breadth of Their Reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, p420-432.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
