An Analysis of Language Politeness Maxims in Bilingual Elementary School Utterances: A Case Study on Rural School

Authors

  • Agung Tri Wibowo Primary School Teacher Education Department, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Sri Yamtinah Primary School Teacher Education Department, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Sukarno Primary School Teacher Education Department, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i2.10373

Keywords:

Bilingualism, Descriptive-pragmatics, Language Politeness, Rural School

Abstract

Politeness in classroom interaction is an essential aspect of students’ pragmatic competence, particularly in bilingual contexts where language use is shaped by social and cultural factors. However, limited attention has been given to how politeness is realized in rural elementary school settings. This study aims to examine how politeness maxims are reflected in students’ bilingual utterances in a rural classroom. Using a descriptive pragmatic approach, the data (n=12) consist of naturally occurring student utterances collected during classroom interaction and analyzed based on Leech’s (2014) Politeness Maxims. The findings show that all six maxims are realized with varying patterns of compliance and violation. Students frequently demonstrate tact, generosity, and agreement through helping behavior, clarification, and supportive responses, reflecting a strong orientation toward maintaining social harmony. However, violations also occur, particularly in the form of direct commands, teasing, and negative expressions in peer interaction. The use of Indonesian and Javanese contributes to these patterns, as students strategically employ both languages to manage formality and interpersonal relations. These findings suggest that politeness is shaped by bilingual competence and local cultural values, and highlight the importance of integrating pragmatic awareness into classroom practices to support more effective and socially appropriate communication.

 

References

Asteka, P., Nisya, R. K., & Rahmawati, I. S. (2024). Politeness in language in the undak usuk basa as a local wisdom of the Sundanese people. KEMBARA, 10(2), 761–777. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v10i2.36031

Atmawati, D. (2021). Language politeness in the Javanese verb speech level. Lingua Cultura, 15(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i1.7109

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2013). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Febriasari, D., & Wijayanti, W. (2018). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam proses pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Kredo, 2(1), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v2i1.2557

Fitriyani, S., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Teacher and students’ politeness strategies in EFL classroom interactions. IJELTAL, 4(2), 259–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.473

Joo, H.-A. (2025). Requesting at work: exploring the intercultural style hypothesis of German-English bilinguals. Multilingua, 0.

Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Liani, A., & Dafit, F. (2023). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam pembelajaran siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Obsesi, 7(6), 6798–6807. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5779

Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41–55.

Mayrita, H., et al. (2025). Language politeness in digital streaming. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(3), 1079–1090.

Meyer, V. (2021). Traces of the Other Form of Life. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 177(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-bja10031

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.

Muharudin, E., et al. (2023). Language politeness of elementary school students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(10), 2712–2719. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.31

Pasaribu, A. N., et al. (2022). Politeness in thesis consultation by WhatsApp. Elsya, 4(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i1.6376

Petraki, E., & Ramayanti, I. (2018). Navigating the Indonesian workplace hierarchy. Journal of Pragmatics, 134, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.010

Prayitno, H. J., et al. (2018). Politeness used by children with Javanese cultural background. Humanus, 17(2), 164–173.

Putria, V. D., & Riyanto, S. (2020). Penyimpangan prinsip kesantunan dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Genre, 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.26555/jg.v2i1.1967

Rahayu, P., & Setiawan, S. (2021). Bilingual children and language use. Language Circle, 16(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v16i1.29690

Riyanto, S., Nugraheni, L., & Sudigdo, A. (2023). Politeness in urban and rural elementary schools. ICLIQE Proceedings, 652–663.

Riyanto, S., et al. (2023). Moderate politeness in primary students. International Journal of Language Education, 7(4), 729–747.

Sudrajat, A., et al. (2022). Kesantunan berbahasa dosen terhadap mahasiswa. Literasi, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23969/literasi.v12i1.4234

Susandi, A., et al. (2024). Students’ language politeness. IJERE, 13(1), 141.

Triyono, S., et al. (2025). Politeness in teaching-learning process. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.17509/azngyy22

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-04

Citation Check