Nur Hidayat(1*), Eva Puspita Sari(2)
(1) STKIP Bina Insan Mandiri, Indonesia
(2) English Education Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1041


This study wanted to investigate the effect of cooperative learning on students’ vocabulary achievement. The subject of this study is 54 students of grade seven in one of public junior high schools in East Java Indonesia. The researcher divided the subjects into two groups; experimental and control groups which consisted of 27 students. The instruments of this study were used tests, and observation. The tests consisted of pre and posttest which delivered in the first and the last meeting. The observation was done to observe the situation of students in the classroom during the implementation of cooperative learning and conventional method. In this study, the researcher used SPSS 24 to analyze the data. The result of this study revealed that the use of cooperative learning and conventional method significantly improve students’ vocabulary achievement. It also gave positive effects for the students such as; increasing students’ motivation and cooperation and decreasing their nervous. The result also showed that there was no significant different between conventional method and cooperative learning on students’ vocabulary achievement.


cooperative learning, conventional method, vocabulary, achievement.


Anwer, M., Tatlah, I. A., & Butt, I. H. (2018). Effect of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Achievement in English Tenses. Pakistan Journal of Education, 35(2), 37–52.

Bilen, D., & Tavil, Z. M. (2015). The Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategies on Vocabulary Skills of 4th Grade Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 151–165.

Bukunola, B.-A. J., & Idowu, O. D. (2012). Effectiveness of cooperative learning strategies on Nigerian junior secondary students’ academic achievement in basic science. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 307–325.

Dabaghmanesh, T., Zamanian, M., & Bagheri, M. S. (2013). The effect of cooperative learning approach on Iranian EFL students’ achievement among different majors in general English course. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(6), 1.

Ghaith, G. (2004). Correlates of the implementation of the STAD cooperative learning method in the English as a foreign language classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 279–294.

Ghorbani, M. R., & Nezamoshari’e, M. (2012). Cooperative learning boosts EFL students’ grammar achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1465.

Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative and small‐group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 271–287.

Gladwin IV, R. F., & Stepp‐Greany, J. (2008). An Interactive, Instructor‐Supported Reading Approach vs. Traditional Reading Instruction in Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 41(4), 687–701.

Gömleksi˙ z, M. N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students (Case of Firat University, Turkey). European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 613–625.

Goudas, M., & Magotsiou, E. (2009). The effects of a cooperative physical education program on students’ social skills. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(3), 356–364.

Hennessy, D., & Evans, R. (2006). Small-group learning in the community college classroom. The Community College Enterprise, 12(1), 93–110.

Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539–558.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis.

Kim, Y. (2008). The role of task‐induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 58(2), 285–325.

Melihan, U., & Sirri, A. (2011). The effect of cooperative learning method on the students’ success and recall levels of the 8th grade students learning in permutation and probability subject. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 12, 1–16.

Motaei, B. (2014). On the effect of cooperative learning on general English achievement of Kermanshah Islamic Azad University students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1249–1254.

Nejad, S. G., & Keshavarzi, A. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension and reading anxiety of pre-university students (Vol. 2, pp. 169–180).

Pan, C.-Y., & Wu, H.-Y. (2013). The Cooperative Learning Effects on English Reading Comprehension and Learning Motivation of EFL Freshmen. English Language Teaching, 6(5), 13–27.

Peters, E. (2007). Manipulating L2 learners’ online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 36–58.

Pichette, F., De Serres, L., & Lafontaine, M. (2011). Sentence reading and writing for second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 66–82.

Rahvard, Z. J. (2010). Cooperative learning strategies and reading comprehension. California Linguistic Notes, 35(2), 1–15.

Richard, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Approaches to teaching. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, 1–5.

Shafiee, S., & Khavaran, S. R. (2017). Effects of cooperative learning on vocabulary achievement of reflective / impulsive iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 5(17), 11–24.

Shimazoe, J., & Aldrich, H. (2010). Group work can be gratifying: Understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 58(2), 52–57.

Slavin, R. E. (1990). Point-counterpoint: Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted.

Zakaria, E., Solfitri, T., Daud, Y., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2013). Effect of cooperative learning on secondary school students’ mathematics achievement. Creative Education, 4(02), 98.

Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. B. T. M. (2010). Collaborative strategic reading with university EFL learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67–94.

Article Statistic

Abstract view : 108 times
PDF views : 83 times

The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off

Full Text: PDF

How To Cite This :


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature